Should the bloodbond system be changed?

by Shiri

Back to The Polling Place.

Shiri2005-02-21 00:39:11
...yes. I want my family, not just TWO of us. angry.gif
Silvanus2005-02-21 00:40:55
Limit it to two siblings, 3 children.
Shiri2005-02-21 00:43:11
Why the heck only two siblings? You're going to limit it MORE?
Silvanus2005-02-21 00:45:31
So, if I bloodbond to Kaervas, and then I could bloodbond to Luthe. It shouldn't be bloodbond to as many people as possible.
Shiri2005-02-21 00:48:16
...that...looks like three to me, but okay. And I don't see why more like...5 isn't good. Or...I dunno. There's just no good REASON for it. (And don't bring up that Great House stuff, because really, count the MAXIMUM people in a family now. It's probably Nikua's, which is kinda inactive, at about 5. (I don't know how the Feyranti are going these days.)) Really, having the bloodbonding stretched to make them POSSIBLE would be a -good- thing.
Silvanus2005-02-21 00:49:38
I meant two other siblings.
Shiri2005-02-21 00:57:06
Fair enough. Now why the heck are people voting one but not the other? :/
Desdemona2005-02-21 01:51:21
Multiple siblings would be fine, probably with a limit of 5 siblings per family. Five is a nice number isn't it? This would be more logical than having some folks walking around with the family name, but with no way of having them become "officially" part of the family.
Summer2005-02-21 04:10:54
QUOTE(Shiri @ Feb 21 2005, 08:57 AM)
Fair enough. Now why the heck are people voting one but not the other? :/
55474



Because at least one of them (ie. me) misread tongue.gif Change it from 4th to 1st?
Shiri2005-02-21 18:48:48
Heh, got it!
Singollo2005-02-21 19:13:45
I have to agree that limiting it to two siblings is a bit well to be politically incorrect retarded.

I mean, increase the number needed for great families if its needed, but allow more siblings.
Shiri2005-02-21 19:20:25
Looks like Silvanus is one in 20. :/