Munsia2005-11-25 10:10:42
well I tried to make a debating echo script telling me what my mindset was and what they were using and what I could possibly switch to using (which is not always the case) but only to find out gender and long names effect it gender is easily fixed but the long names for me is impossible. I dont want it automated I just want some bloody echo's telling me what I am using and what they are using since every debate thing is unique
Munsia2005-11-25 10:13:29
Examples of what I'm looking for
You passionately present your case, fervently arguing your points with emotional
appeals. After a dramatic pause, Harpuia exposes your argument as nothing more
than a baseless form of emotional blackmail.
Harpuia is using Cautious. You used Passion and LOST! SWITCH TO DPO
You passionately present your case, fervently arguing your points with emotional
appeals. Altheil frowns at you and shakes his head, but concedes the argument to
you.
Altheil is using Analytical and you used Passion. SWITCH TO DPE BECAUSE IT ONLY DID A LITTLE BIT
Altheil passionately presents his case, fervently arguing his points with
emotional appeals. The tempestuous argument overwhelms your careful preparation,
leaving you shocked to the point where you find yourself capitulating to the
emotional demands made in the argument.
Altheil used Passion. You are MP. Switch to MC
You passionately present your case, fervently arguing your points with emotional
appeals. After a dramatic pause, Harpuia exposes your argument as nothing more
than a baseless form of emotional blackmail.
Harpuia is using Cautious. You used Passion and LOST! SWITCH TO DPO
You passionately present your case, fervently arguing your points with emotional
appeals. Altheil frowns at you and shakes his head, but concedes the argument to
you.
Altheil is using Analytical and you used Passion. SWITCH TO DPE BECAUSE IT ONLY DID A LITTLE BIT
Altheil passionately presents his case, fervently arguing his points with
emotional appeals. The tempestuous argument overwhelms your careful preparation,
leaving you shocked to the point where you find yourself capitulating to the
emotional demands made in the argument.
Altheil used Passion. You are MP. Switch to MC
Unknown2005-11-25 10:35:20
Just wildcard the name and sex, seems simple to me?
Munsia2005-11-25 10:38:16
the name lengths change randomising the spot for each word
Murphy2005-11-25 11:53:09
mmmm wildcard sex.....
Unknown2005-11-25 12:00:34
Too many beers, Murphy? Actually what am I saying, can't ever have too many.
Murphy2005-11-25 12:05:24
no i'm actually stone cold sober at the moment, oddly enough
silimaur2005-11-25 15:13:48
murphy sure your not just in denial
Diamante2005-11-25 19:23:30
I think you can just substitute
You passionately present your case, fervently arguing your points with emotional
appeals. %1 frowns at you and shakes his head, but concedes the argument to
you.
#SHOW %1 is using Analytical and you used Passion. SWITCH TO DPE BECAUSE IT ONLY DID A LITTLE BIT
As for the gender im not exactly sure, but an easy way around that would be just to make 2 sets of triggers, 1 for female and 1 for male, Im not too good with zMud yet though, so if Im off, dont listen to me >_>
You passionately present your case, fervently arguing your points with emotional
appeals. %1 frowns at you and shakes his head, but concedes the argument to
you.
#SHOW %1 is using Analytical and you used Passion. SWITCH TO DPE BECAUSE IT ONLY DID A LITTLE BIT
As for the gender im not exactly sure, but an easy way around that would be just to make 2 sets of triggers, 1 for female and 1 for male, Im not too good with zMud yet though, so if Im off, dont listen to me >_>
Unknown2005-11-25 19:28:08
(?:his|her) for regex.
Daganev2005-11-25 19:55:28
Your all missing the point, the length of the name affects where the newline is.
Don't trigger the whole prhase just the main keywords. And make a class so that when you start a debate the class opens and it closes when the debate ends just incase.
Don't trigger the whole prhase just the main keywords. And make a class so that when you start a debate the class opens and it closes when the debate ends just incase.
Munsia2005-11-25 23:16:00
THats why I'm requesting a script. someone would have to find all the different lines that are only one important line tfor that specific type. which I think is near impossible
Daganev2005-11-26 02:17:52
Its not hard... This is what I came up with one day, but never bothered to code it in or do anything with it, so its just a text file I have laying around...
The following is a guide to help you learn about DEBATING
*************DEFENDING***********************
While defending with various mindsets, and if you are debating with Marsu, you will discover that you can learn the methods of your debater by noticing within yourself your methods of retort.
Mindset: ANALITICAL
Attacked With: Pettifoggery
The logic of this argument is sound and you find yourself conceding to all the points raised.
Attacked With: Pontification
With great glee, you rip apart his arguments with brilliant logic, transforming the entire discourse into an example of absurdity.
Attacked With: Passion
With absolutely no readily available facts upon which to analyze the argument, you can only frown and shake your head in frustration, conceding this emotional outburst to Marsu.
Mindset: Â CAUTIOUS
Attacked With: Pettifoggery
You can only blink in astonishment at his mindboggling logic.
Attacked With: Pontification
The argument is so preposterous and so full of holes that you don't know where to begin to dissect it, and before you realize it your silence has been taken for concession.
Attacked With: Passion
As temperaments cool, you quietly but firmly expose the argument as nothing more than a baseless form of emotional blackmail.
Mindset: PEDANTIC
Attacked With: Pettifoggery
You laugh in his face and counter every point raised with facts of arcane trivia that deflates the entire dissertation.
Attacked With: Pontification
While you have a hunch that his argument is baseless, it is so general and broad that you are left spluttering in confusion.
Attacked With: Passion
The tempestuous argument overwhelms your careful preparation, leaving you shocked to the point where you find yourself capitulating to the emotional demands made in the argument.'
One who states his arguments with Passion will always do the following:
(name) passionately presents (his|her) case, fervently arguing (his|her) points with emotional appeals
One who states his arguments with Pontification will always do the following:
(name) argues with sweeping authority, buttressing (his|her) broad claims with
dogmatic assumptions and justifications.
One who states his arguments with Pettifoggery will always do the following:
(name) unscrupulously quibbles about the smallest points in (his|her) argument,
bringing up esoteric minutiae to support (his|her) radical theories.
*************************ATTACKING***************
If Thier mind set it ANALYTICAL
and your debate with Pettifoggery
Marsu agrees with the logic and concedes all your points.
and you debate with Pontification
With great glee, Marsu rips apart your arguments with brilliant logic, transforming your entire discourse into an example of absurdity.
and you debate with Passion
Marsu frowns at you and shakes his head, but concedes the
argument to you.
CAUTIOUS
and you debate with Pettifoggery
Marsu can only blink in astonishment at your astounding logic.
and your debate with Pontification
Your argument leaves Marsu staring at you in stupefaction, and his continued silence must obviously be taken for concession.
and you debate with Passion
After a dramatic pause, Marsu exposes your argument as
nothing more than a baseless form of emotional blackmail.
PEDANTIC
and you debate with Pettifoggery
Marsu laughs in your face and counters every point you raise with facts of arcane trivia that deflates your entire dissertation.
and you debate with Pontification
Marsu splutters in confusion, unable to refute your argument.
and you debate with Passion
Marsu is so overwhelmed that he eagerly capitulates to the
emotional demands made in your argument.
Maybe someone in glomdoring can find a use for it
CODE
The following is a guide to help you learn about DEBATING
*************DEFENDING***********************
While defending with various mindsets, and if you are debating with Marsu, you will discover that you can learn the methods of your debater by noticing within yourself your methods of retort.
Mindset: ANALITICAL
Attacked With: Pettifoggery
The logic of this argument is sound and you find yourself conceding to all the points raised.
Attacked With: Pontification
With great glee, you rip apart his arguments with brilliant logic, transforming the entire discourse into an example of absurdity.
Attacked With: Passion
With absolutely no readily available facts upon which to analyze the argument, you can only frown and shake your head in frustration, conceding this emotional outburst to Marsu.
Mindset: Â CAUTIOUS
Attacked With: Pettifoggery
You can only blink in astonishment at his mindboggling logic.
Attacked With: Pontification
The argument is so preposterous and so full of holes that you don't know where to begin to dissect it, and before you realize it your silence has been taken for concession.
Attacked With: Passion
As temperaments cool, you quietly but firmly expose the argument as nothing more than a baseless form of emotional blackmail.
Mindset: PEDANTIC
Attacked With: Pettifoggery
You laugh in his face and counter every point raised with facts of arcane trivia that deflates the entire dissertation.
Attacked With: Pontification
While you have a hunch that his argument is baseless, it is so general and broad that you are left spluttering in confusion.
Attacked With: Passion
The tempestuous argument overwhelms your careful preparation, leaving you shocked to the point where you find yourself capitulating to the emotional demands made in the argument.'
One who states his arguments with Passion will always do the following:
(name) passionately presents (his|her) case, fervently arguing (his|her) points with emotional appeals
One who states his arguments with Pontification will always do the following:
(name) argues with sweeping authority, buttressing (his|her) broad claims with
dogmatic assumptions and justifications.
One who states his arguments with Pettifoggery will always do the following:
(name) unscrupulously quibbles about the smallest points in (his|her) argument,
bringing up esoteric minutiae to support (his|her) radical theories.
*************************ATTACKING***************
If Thier mind set it ANALYTICAL
and your debate with Pettifoggery
Marsu agrees with the logic and concedes all your points.
and you debate with Pontification
With great glee, Marsu rips apart your arguments with brilliant logic, transforming your entire discourse into an example of absurdity.
and you debate with Passion
Marsu frowns at you and shakes his head, but concedes the
argument to you.
CAUTIOUS
and you debate with Pettifoggery
Marsu can only blink in astonishment at your astounding logic.
and your debate with Pontification
Your argument leaves Marsu staring at you in stupefaction, and his continued silence must obviously be taken for concession.
and you debate with Passion
After a dramatic pause, Marsu exposes your argument as
nothing more than a baseless form of emotional blackmail.
PEDANTIC
and you debate with Pettifoggery
Marsu laughs in your face and counters every point you raise with facts of arcane trivia that deflates your entire dissertation.
and you debate with Pontification
Marsu splutters in confusion, unable to refute your argument.
and you debate with Passion
Marsu is so overwhelmed that he eagerly capitulates to the
emotional demands made in your argument.
Maybe someone in glomdoring can find a use for it
Munsia2005-11-26 02:24:59
Will that work to what I wanted?
Daganev2005-11-26 02:27:07
If you read my post carefully then yes it will work. I never fully finished editing it so you will be have to be carefull with what you take.
And If I do ever change it, its only going to be for glomdoring to see, not on here.
And If I do ever change it, its only going to be for glomdoring to see, not on here.
Munsia2005-11-26 03:13:51
All of it is effected by long/short names. The area of the line break changes
Daganev2005-11-26 03:15:23
But alot of the language is also repetetive.
Richter2005-11-29 02:19:50
Maybe I'm missing something, but can't you just trigger the first few words?
Kaileigh2005-12-02 02:03:22
Annoying part is having it trigger for anyone debating.
Unknown2005-12-03 07:46:14
Be sure, that if you want to echo only when you are being debated or debating someone, that you YOU or YOUR in one of the lines, so it wont echo when other people are debating.
Granted, if you don't care about it echoing on other people, just leave wildcards there.
Granted, if you don't care about it echoing on other people, just leave wildcards there.