Been thinking about a few things, thought a poll would be the best way to articulate my questions.

I would just like to take this moment to say that popular opinion does not make truth.

Carry on.

Should include more races

Like Viscanti?

Trill for me. There are plenty of "power to the trill" people out there already.

Oddly enough the dynamic was different in Achaea, and their 'trill' race is what I played as.

First: Trill are cool RP-wise but suck from stats. Same for dwarves, only more (I just LOVE dwarves... no, not that way, you pervert!). But Tae'dae... not only they are one of the worst races ever, but I find their RP very annoying, not fitting Lusternia's subtly dark theme and drawing Syntobis-like types. If I were by any chance a god who participated in their meeting (talking about the tale of Tae), I'd start to lay the smackdown the moment Tae opened his dumb mouth. Murphy style. I have nothing against Winnie the Pooh, but I think Pooh belongs to a very different story.

Second: close call between geomancers and celestines for me. Chosen geomancers.

Third: obvious. Stop bitchin' people! Wait, I am bitching now. Ah.

Yeah, you know with candy land, the evil snow men, angels giggling and frolicing about how dare these Tae'dae ruin the evil image..

Torak is just owning today with his superior logic skills

Tae'dae, Celestine and bitching.

Tae'dae because they're basically the worst possible race for any guild imaginable, with the possible exception of non-Ebonguard warrior faeling. Celestine because they have excellent offense, fair defense and two workable rezz skills. Bitching for the obvious reason.

Blacktalon have the most (unused) potential in combat. Sure, Celestines rule over 1v1 fighting, but from what I saw in the Test Server a few weeks ago, Blacktalons have a lot of potential in combat. If only they used them.

As for the race question, I direct you to my sig.

Glomdoring guilds in general have a lot of potential for group combats, but having numbers is an issue.