Is the reflection in Dick Cheney's sunglasses really a naked woman?
This 'mini-story' appeared on the Today Show. Apparently there was a group of people out there who thought the image being reflected in Cheney's sunglasses was a naked woman.
First off, I defer to Lewis Black's thoughts on Janet Jackson 'flashing' the Superbowl audience. Her breast wasn't on the screen long enough to register, and the only possible way you could've seen it was to go back and watch it in slow motion. Therefore, those people who 'saw' the breast didn't actually see one, they just wanted to, and therefore convinced themselves that there was one. Same deal here. Someone wanted to see a naked woman, and therefore did.
Secondly, if you're a person of reasonable intelligence, then after three seconds of looking at the picture SPECIFICALLY looking to see a naked woman, you'll realize that her breasts are of impossible proportion and location, even taking into account the distortion from reflection.
Thirdly, WHAT THE
P.S.: At first glance, I thought it was a flame showing through the tint of his glasses, proving that once and for all that Cheney is, in fact, Satan. I mean, come on, the guy's had four heart attacks and hasn't died. At the very least he's some kind of high level demon.
This 'mini-story' appeared on the Today Show. Apparently there was a group of people out there who thought the image being reflected in Cheney's sunglasses was a naked woman.
First off, I defer to Lewis Black's thoughts on Janet Jackson 'flashing' the Superbowl audience. Her breast wasn't on the screen long enough to register, and the only possible way you could've seen it was to go back and watch it in slow motion. Therefore, those people who 'saw' the breast didn't actually see one, they just wanted to, and therefore convinced themselves that there was one. Same deal here. Someone wanted to see a naked woman, and therefore did.
Secondly, if you're a person of reasonable intelligence, then after three seconds of looking at the picture SPECIFICALLY looking to see a naked woman, you'll realize that her breasts are of impossible proportion and location, even taking into account the distortion from reflection.
Thirdly, WHAT THE
P.S.: At first glance, I thought it was a flame showing through the tint of his glasses, proving that once and for all that Cheney is, in fact, Satan. I mean, come on, the guy's had four heart attacks and hasn't died. At the very least he's some kind of high level demon.
QUOTE(Bashara @ Apr 11 2008, 03:27 PM) 501207
Is the reflection in Dick Cheney's sunglasses really a naked woman?
This 'mini-story' appeared on the Today Show. Apparently there was a group of people out there who thought the image being reflected in Cheney's sunglasses was a naked woman.
First off, I defer to Lewis Black's thoughts on Janet Jackson 'flashing' the Superbowl audience. Her breast wasn't on the screen long enough to register, and the only possible way you could've seen it was to go back and watch it in slow motion. Therefore, those people who 'saw' the breast didn't actually see one, they just wanted to, and therefore convinced themselves that there was one. Same deal here. Someone wanted to see a naked woman, and therefore did.
Secondly, if you're a person of reasonable intelligence, then after three seconds of looking at the picture SPECIFICALLY looking to see a naked woman, you'll realize that her breasts are of impossible proportion and location, even taking into account the distortion from reflection.
Thirdly, WHAT THE
P.S.: At first glance, I thought it was a flame showing through the tint of his glasses, proving that once and for all that Cheney is, in fact, Satan. I mean, come on, the guy's had four heart attacks and hasn't died. At the very least he's some kind of high level demon.
This 'mini-story' appeared on the Today Show. Apparently there was a group of people out there who thought the image being reflected in Cheney's sunglasses was a naked woman.
First off, I defer to Lewis Black's thoughts on Janet Jackson 'flashing' the Superbowl audience. Her breast wasn't on the screen long enough to register, and the only possible way you could've seen it was to go back and watch it in slow motion. Therefore, those people who 'saw' the breast didn't actually see one, they just wanted to, and therefore convinced themselves that there was one. Same deal here. Someone wanted to see a naked woman, and therefore did.
Secondly, if you're a person of reasonable intelligence, then after three seconds of looking at the picture SPECIFICALLY looking to see a naked woman, you'll realize that her breasts are of impossible proportion and location, even taking into account the distortion from reflection.
Thirdly, WHAT THE
P.S.: At first glance, I thought it was a flame showing through the tint of his glasses, proving that once and for all that Cheney is, in fact, Satan. I mean, come on, the guy's had four heart attacks and hasn't died. At the very least he's some kind of high level demon.
the question is this though, what does this have to do with lusternia
(we have a RL rants topic somewhere!
)It doesn't even really look like a naked woman in the uncleared up version. Unless you've got a pervy mind or something. 
Or at least, if it does, it'd have to be a horribly deformed naked woman!
Or at least, if it does, it'd have to be a horribly deformed naked woman! QUOTE(Noola @ Apr 11 2008, 09:40 AM) 501233
It doesn't even really look like a naked woman in the uncleared up version. Unless you've got a pervy mind or something. Or at least, if it does, it'd have to be a horribly deformed naked woman!
Or at least, if it does, it'd have to be a horribly deformed naked woman! Says the one who thinks a squashed bird looks like a bad dragon!
@Xavius, you need larger knuckles.
QUOTE(daganev @ Apr 11 2008, 12:17 PM) 501234
Says the one who thinks a squashed bird looks like a bad dragon!
@Xavius, you need larger knuckles.
@Xavius, you need larger knuckles.
Piffle. That 'bird' was drawn with a finger. Badly.
It's easy, he's a lich. Every time he gets a nice thought, his heart beats for a fraction of a second. He's had four of those his entire unlife. He's a shotgun wielding lich.
Regarding the sunglasses, it's kinda interesting how many people thought it was a naked woman. As stated, it was there for a short second and people immediately thought "ZOMG, naked woman. Rewind, slow motion, let's take a good look at this. Gravity don't work that way, regardless of what cartoons say.
'course, it would explain that grin on his face. No one smiles like that when they catch a fish or are fishing.
Regarding the sunglasses, it's kinda interesting how many people thought it was a naked woman. As stated, it was there for a short second and people immediately thought "ZOMG, naked woman. Rewind, slow motion, let's take a good look at this. Gravity don't work that way, regardless of what cartoons say.
'course, it would explain that grin on his face. No one smiles like that when they catch a fish or are fishing.
QUOTE(Jigan @ Apr 11 2008, 04:40 PM) 501336
It's easy, he's a lich. Every time he gets a nice thought, his heart beats for a fraction of a second. He's had four of those his entire unlife. He's a shotgun wielding lich.
Regarding the sunglasses, it's kinda interesting how many people thought it was a naked woman. As stated, it was there for a short second and people immediately thought "ZOMG, naked woman. Rewind, slow motion, let's take a good look at this. Gravity don't work that way, regardless of what cartoons say.
'course, it would explain that grin on his face. No one smiles like that when they catch a fish or are fishing.
Regarding the sunglasses, it's kinda interesting how many people thought it was a naked woman. As stated, it was there for a short second and people immediately thought "ZOMG, naked woman. Rewind, slow motion, let's take a good look at this. Gravity don't work that way, regardless of what cartoons say.
'course, it would explain that grin on his face. No one smiles like that when they catch a fish or are fishing.
Nerf lich plz
Reading this made me remember I haven't gone fishing since September. I need to go again 
