The title is somewhat self explanatory, and I'm 99.99% sure both of these topics have been brought up before.

I'm just interested as to why.

You little deviant, you.



Maybe Lusternia is trying vainly to preserve what little moral fiber most of the players have left?

You see, the problem a lot of players (such as myself) have when getting an IG marriage is that there is too much selection.

If my idea were to be implemented, then I can marry all of my suitors, and therefore, everyone wins!

wtb concubine.

Notice how he cleverly implies that more than one person seek Bael actively. -titter-



Interestingly enough, though, that'd be a neat mechanic. I vote concubines!

You would!

Hahahaha.

I was expecting Luciden to be the original poster here.

I always found it odd people find polygamy morally objective.

Let's have a discussion on if polygamy is morally objective.

Who wants to start?

IMHO, it is, because peopls should be devoted to one person, marriage wise. People get jealous, and such, with polygamy. I mean, if you want to screw around, get a mistress?

I think you need to shut up and visit a text brothel for entertainment. You obviously have nothing better to do!

I(the character Silvanus) approves of this idea.

I tried that, once. It was sad, I knew more than the person I was with...

Amature Hookers. Pft.

I (the player and character) agree with this idea. Hell, it was my idea long ago!

Guess I know where the marriage is going.

(not that I really mind this type of stuff in the game)

I j00!

Well if it floats your boat...

I say if you want to play the polygamy card you don't ever get married (unless there's a dowry involved), and just muck around with who you like. But be sure to stay honest with all the girls.

Or get married and have mates on the side your spouse knows about?

:Peer Ixchilgal:

No, that's a bad idea