So, when spellcrafting came about, I felt it was underwhelming and boring. Everything great about the original enchantment was stuffed into the new Enchantment and Spellcrafters were left with such epic ideas as Fabled Acquisitio. *yawn*

So... I have this little proposal to change Spellcraft from being the bore-fest it is. It ain't much, but Spellcraft needs all the help it can get.

I propose that Spellcrafter shall be able to

SPELLCRAFT (Mercy/Beauty/Kingdom/Perfection/Focus) OVER *person*

Considering that we're supposed to be superior enchanters, we should be able to cast basic enchantments over a person without having to cast the spell onto jewelry first.

So, you suggest being able to give someone the defense without their having to rub it?

Looks like that's the intention.

Focus wouldn't really work like that though.

Yeah. Focus would just heal a random debate affliction, like the enchantment does. It's not too important though. It's the other four I want. It allows Spellcrafter to not carry around rings for Mercy and the likes, and help others get the blessings in an emergency.

Sounds like a job for your envoy!

What envoy. They just appoint guys who go inactive.

Anyway, I wanted to make sure that there weren't any glaring flaws I've overlooked.

(And add Lastharvest to Nature and Herbs )

Zynna's our envoy and active. Ask her if she can submit something for you.

I think it would be fine if it was just to yourself and a very near trans skill.

Why? Elaborate.

Well, no real balancing reason, I just think that it should be to yourself only, and the near trans is for obvious reasons. That all aside it would get annoying to have people begging and eventually expecting you to give them enchantments.

So charge for it.

Yup. If you want mercy, you have to pay. Why do I have to strain myself to give it to you free, when it's easier for me to enchant it on jewelry and wait for you to buy it?

Eh?