Unknown2011-06-25 18:09:22
I'm thinking of writing up a system for farhealing and farcuring. I thought it'd be easy because I don't have to worry about the trigger lines of a full curing system. But, I can also go, "succor x; succor y; succor z; succor a," and then I have to prioritize who to cure first. Can I generally expect people to target melder > bard~monk > guardian > warrior? Should I use that as the basis for prioritizing targets to cure?
Thanks!
Thanks!
Enyalida2011-06-25 18:13:22
That seems just about correct, though you could also consider rigging up a system that incorporates calls from those in the fight, updating you on who is currently being targeted.
Unknown2011-06-25 22:59:23
That's good to hear.
I think I presumed too much about prioritizing curing afflictions though. It seems pretty dependent on who the opponents are? In a group fight, do I still have to know each opponent's guild and their tertiary specializations in order to know what to prioritize curing?
I think I presumed too much about prioritizing curing afflictions though. It seems pretty dependent on who the opponents are? In a group fight, do I still have to know each opponent's guild and their tertiary specializations in order to know what to prioritize curing?
Vadi2011-06-25 23:25:38
You'll definitely lose your non-comm status with that
(and you do need all lines, plus logic to figure out which type of cure to use for which affliction, for the farcuring)
(and you do need all lines, plus logic to figure out which type of cure to use for which affliction, for the farcuring)
Enyalida2011-06-26 01:16:46
As far as I'm aware most or all the diagnose lines are on the wiki.
Unknown2011-06-26 02:14:30
*pat Lendren's wiki*
I won't be a non-combatant if I learn combat? ^^;;
I won't be a non-combatant if I learn combat? ^^;;