Daganev2005-01-13 00:32:01
Yeah, Dark Thick and sticky = Marmalade type thing.
Come to think of it, there was one australian in that group of SA, English and Israeli folk. It was vegemite not Marmite, but marmite might be why I thought it was marmalade.
The other fun thing was Choclate spread sandwhiches, you wierdos.
Come to think of it, there was one australian in that group of SA, English and Israeli folk. It was vegemite not Marmite, but marmite might be why I thought it was marmalade.
The other fun thing was Choclate spread sandwhiches, you wierdos.
Shiri2005-01-13 00:33:26
No, chocolate spread sandwiches rock, you leave them alone.
It's all these bizarre Aussie chemicals that are the disturbing things.
It's all these bizarre Aussie chemicals that are the disturbing things.
Daganev2005-01-13 00:38:39
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militarism
Militarism is the ideology that military strength is the source of all security. In its mildest form it is often stated as many more specific arguments for military preparedness, all of which tend to assume that "peace through strength" is the best or only way to achieve peace.
Later it says
So what that has to do with America was a little beyond me, untill I realized that some peace now people think that Iraq, Nazi Germany and United States of America, all have A LOT in common.
Which was why I brought up the Opium wars, where China thought it could maintain peace by having a one way trade agreement, and that Westerns were inherntly inferior, which then led Japan to build up its military so the Western 7 couldn't take them over to, and so where China failed with Trade Agreements, Japan succeeded with military power.
Militarism is the ideology that military strength is the source of all security. In its mildest form it is often stated as many more specific arguments for military preparedness, all of which tend to assume that "peace through strength" is the best or only way to achieve peace.
Later it says
QUOTE
One aspect of militarism is the ascendancy of a small clique of military officers to unchallenged power, as in Iraq, Nazi Germany, and most of Latin America up until the 1980s. Nevertheless, although many militaristic states are military dictatorships, militarism is not synonymous with dictatorship or authoritarianism; liberal democracy and militarism are not mutually exclusive.
So what that has to do with America was a little beyond me, untill I realized that some peace now people think that Iraq, Nazi Germany and United States of America, all have A LOT in common.
Which was why I brought up the Opium wars, where China thought it could maintain peace by having a one way trade agreement, and that Westerns were inherntly inferior, which then led Japan to build up its military so the Western 7 couldn't take them over to, and so where China failed with Trade Agreements, Japan succeeded with military power.
