In the traditional definition, Rexali's a bit evil, but not really.

First priority: personal gain.
Second priority: gain of his groups.
Third priority... won't be revealed for some time.

Just so you know where I'm comming from, I would consider Daganev a good charachter working for an evil organization

You are so pathetic with your little insults and atleast Guido isn't a big mouth coward.

Guido's to-do list, in order:
1. Revitalization of the Glomdoring.
2. Destruction of the Serenwilde.
3. Destruction of New Celest.
4. Destruction of Magnagora.
5. Overthrowing the Elder Gods, esp. Lisaera + Auseklis.
6. Claiming the power of the Soulless, reigning over creation, ect.

I figure I could, possibly, complete step 1. The rest are a bit sketchy. Eh? Don't look at me like that.

Why Magnagora?

They are a city, which he sees an obstacle. His vision for the Glomdoring and beyond is a world of nature fully united with the taint; those who hole themselves up in cities are weak to him. He also has more than a mild loathing toward them due to their actions (Or lack thereof) with the Disciples. Guido hates everyone, baaasically.

Very poetic.

You holed yourself in Magnagora for a while .

Pigs (Three Different Ones), by Pink Floyd is a good anti-everything song .

Indeed; Guido keeps his dislike as well hidden as he could manage, what with them being his last true safe zone.

Yeah, the traditional evil person will put personal welfare over public ideals, usually.

Really? I was unaware of that. I consider Silvanus is evil, and he'd do anything to spread the Taint and further it, putting the Taint above his goals.

Thats why I have you as my number one Evil Person.

Vis. You all know it. He is the epitome of evil RP. Not to mention asshole RP.

Well, it depends. If it's a long-term goal that probably won't be finished in one move (e.g. Guido's list), then I don't think you'd want to go and sacrifice yourself at the start, especially if it's just going to get you nowhere. If you're going to get something serious done, and it requires some sacrifice, then it changes.

We know, Shiro. That's why he's better than you. Some people can't be perfect, but some people do manage to be just the opposite. IE you. !

Can we try and refrain from turning this into an Erion/Shiro mud-slinging festival of boringness?

He started it.

Excuse me? Your the one who started with the insults.

In the traditional D&D spectrum there is a difference between Lawfull Evil and Chaotic Evil. To me, Lawfull Evil would actually be a good charachter but working for an evil organization.

I think anyone who places themselves above the community or some higher goal is evil, anyone who places the higher goal above themselves is good. Anyone who switches back and forth would be neutral.

If the reason you push for the spraid of Taint is that you think the Taint deserves to be spread, then you are good, if you think the spread of Taint will make you more famous and give you more power, then you are just being evil with a goal similar to others.

To quote Dennnis Miller, Thats just my opinion, I could be wrong.