Warrior Complaints

by Geb

Back to Combat Logs.

Geb2005-03-17 14:00:14
QUOTE(Thorgal @ Mar 17 2005, 02:44 PM)
You got some serious ego issues dude...do you really think frying me with your artifacted, blessed staffcasts from another room would prove your point?

You whine about knights doing too much damage to you, while you're wearing a dress, being reincarnated as the race with the lowest con, having a penalty against the element you're being hit with, againt a viscanti with over 20 strength...

...and you're gonna kill an aslaran nihilist to prove that point?
75068



Nothing about my statement said that warriors do too much damage against soft targets. I only stated that warriors do darn good damage against soft targets. Afterwards, I stated that warrior upgrades would have to take into account how they effect all archetypes.

I knew you would back out. You like to speak as an authority on combat, but you seem to always refuse to prove your skill. I see now that the best thing for me to do is just ignore you, because you do not have the ability to demonstrate the skill you would try to make people believe you have through your statements.

Unknown2005-03-17 14:01:32
Thank you Thorgal. -claps wildly-
Geb2005-03-17 14:04:34
QUOTE(bwbettin @ Mar 17 2005, 02:48 PM)
Obviously your memory isn't that good.  The whole point of this topic was the following:
To me this is clearly saying to not upgrade BM Knights much, or at the very least to keep in mind the "soft targets".  My point is that although you should be "soft"...you're really not.  If "soft" targets like yourself can tank 2 BM Knights without blinking much, imagine how much trouble we have against the "hard" targets.  I don't think I misread your points, if I did it wasn't by very much.
75070



Saying not to upgrade BMs much? Have you read my later replies? I have agreed with Daevos that BMs need upgrades more than BCs. That BMs need better critical wounds afflictions. I only was stating that the whole spectrum needs to be looked at, and not just the damage aspect. My whole statement was started with restating a problem warriors have damaging each other.

I am not adverse to warriors receiving upgrades, I am just making sure that the whole picture is looked at when those upgrades are made.

To answer your point about me tanking Daevos and Your damage. I use the great ability called run, I ran like a bat out of hell. I asked my question, and ran again. I sent my tell and ran some more. I used my cubix, and ran even more. I did not tank your damage, I ran from your damage.
Thorgal2005-03-17 14:20:29
QUOTE(geb @ Mar 16 2005, 08:11 PM)
That combo did 1704 damage to me. Considering that my max health is only 3006, he did over 57% of my health in one combo.
74634



QUOTE(geb @ Mar 17 2005, 04:00 PM)
Nothing about my statement said that warriors do too much damage against soft targets
75073



Well excuse me for thinking you were bitching again your highness, and I've beaten Narsrim, Tuek and Ethelon before, not Amaru sadly.

Granted I may not be able to do so again now, since I'm not even trans my guildskills anymore, but I like to think I've fought a lot more than you, arena combat != real combat.

I may not be around for every raid and war, but I've been around in plenty of them, and I have never, ever, seen you fight in a single one.

Now let's end this retarded egofest of who killed who, cause I haven't heard any praises of your amazing combat skill from either your friends or your enemies, I'm not the greatest fighter as an aslaran nihilist with one trans skill, but I know my censor.gif either way.

You started a topic about knights doing a lot of damage to you, then you state that you don't have any problems with those knights at all, that you wop the floor with most, then you say you were running from their damage again, make up your mind.

Wath your language --Daganev
Geb2005-03-17 14:23:46
QUOTE(Thorgal @ Mar 17 2005, 03:20 PM)
Well excuse me for thinking you were bitching again your highness, and I've beaten Narsrim, Tuek and Ethelon before, not Amaru sadly.

Granted I may not be able to do so again now, since I'm not even trans my guildskills anymore, but I like to think I've fought a lot more than you, arena combat != real combat.

I may not be around for every raid and war, but I've been around in plenty of them, and I have never, ever, seen you fight in a single one.
75080



Then meet me out somewhere and we can fight.
Thorgal2005-03-17 14:31:22
Sure then.
Geb2005-03-17 14:32:40
I said I stand toe to toe with many warriors. I said I would mop the floor with you. There were two warriors attacking me, Thorgal. Did you read his post? He acknowledged that he was attacking me with Daevos.

It sometimes seem that reading comprehension is lacking around here.
Ialie2005-03-17 14:33:50
*sigh*


Men and their eternal battles of the penis.
Geb2005-03-17 14:36:09
QUOTE(Ialie @ Mar 17 2005, 03:33 PM)
*sigh*
Men and their eternal battles of the penis.
75085



It is a genetic trait tied to the Y chromosome. It is a bit hard to fight something that has been a part of males since the beginning of mankind.
Thorgal2005-03-17 15:13:04
Well we fought, and the result was, Geb can't beat me without his demesne, and I can't beat him without trans guildskills. I'll post the log.
Geb2005-03-17 15:23:14
QUOTE(Thorgal @ Mar 17 2005, 04:13 PM)
Well we fought, and the result was, Geb can't beat me without his demesne, and I can't beat him without trans guildskills. I'll post the log.
75106



Thorgal, please tell the whole story. You ran out of health vials, so we stopped to allow you to acquire some more. Next you ran out of herbs, so you then teleported back to your city. The fight was inconclusive, because you did not allow it to finish.
Erion2005-03-17 15:28:04
TECHNICALITIES! Why not fight in the friggin' arena? Punks.
Geb2005-03-17 15:33:46
QUOTE(Erion @ Mar 17 2005, 04:28 PM)
TECHNICALITIES!  Why not fight in the friggin' arena?  Punks.
75112



Granted I may not be able to do so again now, since I'm not even trans my guildskills anymore, but I like to think I've fought a lot more than you, arena combat != real combat.

I remember a certain somebody making that statemen. laugh.gif
Thorgal2005-03-17 15:50:02
Yes, and generally when I fight out of arena, there's an outcome, either I beat my target or my target is skilled enough to beat me, which you obviously weren't. Despite your braggings, the fact that I'm not trans in my guildskills, and you being an artiho 340% of my might.
Geb2005-03-17 16:00:55
Yes, yes. You leave twice, but it is my fault.
Thorgal2005-03-17 16:06:01
Yes, it's your fault, you shoulda killed me! At least I wouldn't have lost all my herbs then, it can't be that hard, hell I even got a lvl2 weakness to your kind of damage.
Geb2005-03-17 16:22:41
Yes, it is my fault. I changed into a dwarf earlier this lusternia month for bashing and was ill prepared to kill you today. Next time I will make sure I pick a suitable race to rain down destruction on you.
Ceres2005-03-17 16:25:59
And if you do, your immense talent will be made known withal!
Geb2005-03-17 16:30:31
QUOTE(Ceres @ Mar 17 2005, 05:25 PM)
And if you do, your immense talent will be made known withal!
75149



I don't claim to have immense talent. I believe no one is extremely talented here in Lusternia. I believe many are skilled and know their way around combat, you being one of them. But, extremely talented is not something I would label anyone until the skills are a bit more balanced.
Ceres2005-03-17 16:32:22
I'll apologise for that, actually.

I was just being mean.

comfort.gif