My gut does not have valid information regarding this game.

My gut is mainly saying, "WTF, I HAVEN'T HAD KFC SINCE WEDNESDAY"

Then, he becomes disengaged for a few hours, before repeating that message.

I vote for Silvanus.

7 votes Silvanus
4 votes Summer
1 vote Jack, 'cause he's weird.

Wow, you really do mess yourself up by talking too much.

Damnit.

I'll vote for Jack too, I'm really too tired to play mind games at this point.

I hope you're just waking up, not going to sleep, Lyren.

Why the hell is everyone voting for Silvanus???

Because he tried to stop discussions about it (tried to call it hijacking even) which made him seem nervous about it.

I'm just voting for him 'cause he was being spiteful. Woulda been voting Nyla else.

Anyway, we have no idea at this stage really. Day after tomorrow when someone else is killed (or guarded) we'll start to have more of an idea, but at this stage it's just random, and we may as well vote off someone.

And not Summer, 'cause she's nice, and didn't get the chance to get far last time. *eye*

Well, upon looking back to the first page of this thread, I see what you were discussing... could count as, in a way, Bug Abuse? Sort of. Soll said something that he shouldn't have, edited it away, but you kept talking about it.

MM, wasn't silvanus a soulless last time? What are the chances he could be one again?

Exactly the same as anyone else. Er, I think. It's random selection if I remember correctly. And no, it's definately not bug abuse, by any stretch of the definition. It certainly wasn't hijacking, which is what Silvanus was calling it.

I thought Soll picked them. My bad.

Knowing something your not supposed to know (throught the 'game' telling you too much) would be bug abuse. Yeah, its not hijacking. EDIT: And apparently its not big, either. But it still remains.

But whos more suspicious? Someone who says "Don't talk about that, its not related to the game," or someone who says, "YOUR IT!!!!!!! I KNOW IT!!!!!"

Let me just clarify, what I said was -really- no big thing. It doesn't mean anything either way, only that I said something that didn't really need saying. Summer pointed it out, and I removed it, so that no-one will know in the future who is guarded when it starts to matter.

Wow, so much happening so quickly, not sure I can keep up properly *twitch*

Whoever said that they picked the Soulless from whoever voted for Eldanien, blech. I voted for him because I thought it completely ridiculous that everyone just believed him like that when he had no proof and it would have been very good for the Soulless if he'd been one. And then you all jumped on me cause I was wrong . That said, I'm jumping on the Silvanus bandwagon because everyone else was right last time and I wasn't

Silvanus - 8 (Summer, Tsuki, Shiri, BobStar, Annelia, Jalain, Anonymous, Shoshana)
Summer - 4 (Kashim, Nyla, Silvanus, Dyr)
Jack - 2 (Jack, Lyren)
Shiri - 1 (Rauros)

4 people left, and they'd all have to vote for Summer to make it even a tie. Looks like Silvanus is going out unless there's a major shift of opinion...

My vote goes to Shiri, as I'm 90% sure he's a Soulless. Even if yall dont kill him today, at least kill him tomorrow.

Thank you, that is all.

Jack voted for himself? Nice way of avoiding responsibility...

Responsibility? And Jack, if you are a Soulless, you still win if your team does because you killed enough of us even if one of you dies. (I think.) So that's a pretty poor way of allaying suspicion.

Anyone else thinks it's suspicious Daganev hasn't posted yet, especially considering how he was saying in TSG 1 that the last 5 to post = soulless because they have no need to communicate over the forums? He made 32 posts (yeah I counted ) in the last 24 hours, and _none_ of them in this thread.

Yeah, Shamarah and so on I can understand for not voting, as he might well have been away, but Daganev's been part of the debate about Viravain...

I don't feel like making the same mistake we made last time and killing off a seer the first round
I vote for Summer