Maybe I'm reading too much into the phrasing, but I sure hope that the reason you didn't put "if still alive" for Soulless too isn't because all who've been killed so far are Elders.

I don't think the phrasing is particularly suggestive, but as we didn't have a huge amount of evidence for the last two people we voted off, and were mainly just speculating, and there's far fewer of them than there are of us, so the odds are that we didn't actually manage to nail them during the day. We can hope, though.

EDIT: Oh, I see what you mean now, he put "if still alive" on Guardians/Seers. I hope none of them have died, it lowers our chances even more.

There's no point putting "if still alive" for Soulless, because you'll know when they're all dead when I announce it. Once all the Soulless are dead, the game ends. While the game continues, there are Soulless alive, and so "if still alive" just doesn't need to go there.

Sheesh, yall go too fast But if anyone was wondering, I still think Shiri is a Soulless for obvious reasons. And it appears two other people agreed. So if the Soulless (read as Shiri) offs me tonight, kill Shiri tomorrow.

Thank you, that is all.

Obvious reasons my foot. Jalain and Nyla voted completely out of the blue! (And Jalain admits it.)

What's obvious to you may not be equally obvious to us. Explain please? Would be interesting to see all your reasonings instead of just "I vote for x."

I think its the way he's trying to coordinate how everyone talks and stuff, and is playing 'moderator'

Just like Silvanus did last game.

but I'm not sure.

How am I doing either of those things? *curious*
Also, Eldanien was doing that sort of thing, and while he did have a special position unlike me...well, he wasn't a Soulless, is the point. I think I only seem to do the moderator or whatever thing because I post way too much.

constant repition of the lists of names that Soll is allready doing is what I ment by moderation, and constantly pointing out who is voting for who with suggested reasons is what I ment by directing the conversation.

That's not moderation, that's just making it easier for everyone (me included) to see who's left. (Soll isn't already doing it. Where did you get that impression? Or did you mean he's keeping the list for himself, rather than the public? In which case, yeah, I'm doing it so -everyone- can see.)
And, well, yeah. Okay. Seems like something anyone who thought they had a clue would do rather than just a Soulless though. If you're quiet, you get nailed randomly. Like Etanru.

So Etanru might've been a Seer and you voted against him anyway? You and four others when you almost got ousted yourself ... ? I want to say that's too convenient, but I don't know anymore.

Perhaps I shouldn't've said that before the night's over, but maybe we'll see. Assuming I survive tonight, is the next day going to end before midmorning on Friday EDT? I don't know if I'm going to have spare time before then to vote if I'm still alive.

look at page 4 you posted right before soll did...

*cough* Nah, I was just copying his post, actually, to try and make him not MOD EVERYTHING.

_Everyone's_ a potential Seer unless they come out and say honestly that they are not one (and then get voted off by you guys because you'd rather vote off an elder just to be sure that you aren't voting off a Seer / Guardian). Are you going to refrain from voting against anyone unless they actually follow my example and say that they are not a Seer / Guardian? If I wanted to be 100% sure that I'm not voting off a Seer / Guardian, I'd be voting for myself.

Sure at least one or two of those who changed their votes from me are probably soulless. But how do you know that there isn't a Seer who checked me and _knows_ that I'm not a Soulless among them? Or maybe some regular elder just happens to believe me over Etanru.

Ooh, ooh, I'm not a Seer!

But.. Am I a Guardian?

Yer too evil to be a guardian.

(Not like I know for sure, but yeah )

You hurt my feelings.

Hehehehe

I'm going to maim you.

EEEEP! HELP! HELPPP!