Manjanaia2005-04-21 17:52:35
I'd genuinely love to switch to Glomdoring and run for admin of the warrior guild. Which I highly likely wouldn't get. But a nice sec job were I can be involved in establishing the guild would be nice. That's if I'm allowed in of course...
Devris2005-04-21 17:59:03
I will kind of enjoy seeing the guilds come together though, as you are gonna have the biggest clusterpuck of guildmates thrown together. I think the most diverse (possibly most chaotic) will be the ebonguard as you really haven't had a strong leader knight step forward. You have a few interested, but I really haven't seen any of them step up yet and grab the reigns.
Should be fun to watch.
Should be fun to watch.
Daganev2005-04-21 18:06:25
I will slightly disagree with Gregori.
Sometimes, a group of people come to a mutual consencous and don't have a person who is more dominant than any of the others.
Sometimes, a group of people come to a mutual consencous and don't have a person who is more dominant than any of the others.
Erion2005-04-21 20:51:19
Eh. Sometimes, Daganev. But in situations like this, mutual agreeance doesn't work. Mutual agreeance was attempted in Celest. See how that turned out? Now look at Magnagora, where someone is always barking orders. Hmm.
Richter2005-04-21 20:58:17
Ah, people mentioned me. I feel the love. Minister of trade? Hadn't given much thought to that before recently... Interesting idea. But hey, we'll see what happens, aye?
Daganev2005-04-21 20:58:48
The ur'guard leadership has mutual agreement. It was kind of pathetic when all the people running for positions say.. I don't really want this job but...
Mutual agreement does not mean everyone has an equal say, it means everyone has the same vision in mind.
Mutual agreement does not mean everyone has an equal say, it means everyone has the same vision in mind.