Sanctuary during influencing

by Silvanus

Back to Common Grounds.

Elryn2005-04-24 23:31:22
Can't you just campaign crusade first? And stop them using sanctuary at all?
Shiri2005-04-24 23:32:10
True.

Only CR3+s, though. I wouldn't guarantee Silvanus has that with the number of times he got kicked out. tongue.gif
Silvanus2005-04-24 23:32:47
I'm cityrank 4.


EDIT: And, not everyone has that. And they could kill someone, and right hwne you get there they could sanctuary.
Shiri2005-04-24 23:33:24
...then do what Elryn said and you don't have to worry? huh.gif
Nokraenom2005-04-24 23:40:23
So the other person should have to spend 1 power of their own to prevent someone else from using a 1 power get-out-of-jail-free card? That makes no sense.

5 minutes is perhaps a bit long, but the point Silvanus is trying to make is perfectly valid. Either sanctuary shouldn't be able to be used if you've done an aggresive action in the past few minutes, or, the option I prefer:

Sanctuary shouldn't protect those who have done an aggressive action in the last minute.
Elryn2005-04-24 23:45:29
I'm not seeing the problem.

If you want to be protected from violence while influencing, there are relatively simple means. If you want to use force while influencing and prevent people hiding behind a sanctuary, again there are means.

If you choose not use them, or your strategy is not as good as your opponents, then I'm not sure what else needs to be done about it.
Silvanus2005-04-24 23:49:17
If you want to be protected by violence, then you should not initiate the violence.
Elryn2005-04-24 23:51:02
I meant the people Narsrim is attacking can be protected in the first place by representatives of your city. Prevention is better than reaction. tongue.gif
Rhysus2005-04-25 00:26:01
Right now, village influencing is still supremely dumb. It's just this huge throw yourselves into a demesne suicide run that the actual act of influencing barely factors into at all. I still maintain that village influencing would be far more interesting and better for the realm if it were implemented better.
Athana2005-04-25 00:39:52
I agree with Silvanus, that is really lame.
Daevos2005-04-25 00:47:27
The only thing wrong with influencing now, is the effect of demenses on it.
Unknown2005-04-25 01:38:39
Sanctuary is working exactly like how it should. You need to put up crusade to prevent them from calling sanctuary. Simple.
Laysus2005-04-25 01:45:03
The point of sanctuary is it means you don't die while in a village that's contested. And you're complaining about this?

And I don't think I attacked you, Silvanus. The only fight I got in with mags there was running into a room full of you and then getting 20 seconds of lag while you all killed me. After that I was just sanctuarying and debating everyone.
Asarnil2005-04-25 01:48:44
QUOTE(Anonymous @ Apr 25 2005, 12:08 PM)
Sanctuary is working exactly like how it should. You need to put up crusade to prevent them from calling sanctuary. Simple.
106464



Yes, that SO stops them from moving one room away and putting up sanctuary there. Which is just as bad.
Unknown2005-04-25 02:03:32
Influencing is supposed to be non-violent anyway.
Erion2005-04-25 02:28:15
So next time you try to kill me in a contested village, tuek, I'm going to sanctuary whore. =\\
Unknown2005-04-25 02:29:04
You just wanted to say whore, Erion :/.
Erion2005-04-25 02:29:57
Your mom.
Unknown2005-04-25 02:46:05
Na uh, yo momma!
Athana2005-04-25 03:16:16
QUOTE(Anonymous @ Apr 25 2005, 02:03 AM)
Influencing is supposed to be non-violent anyway.
106473



laugh.gif

how boring