Marsu2005-05-03 13:07:50
or how about don't smash anyones shield? because its lame and pointless. I'll still dilute you for smashing other people's shields as well and claim innocence. I think Celest would believe me over you *hope*
Unknown2005-05-03 13:38:06
If you don't want me to shieldsmash, then don't use your shield in battle. Its stupid I can't use a skill, just because other thinks its lame.
Marsu2005-05-03 13:43:38
You could always learn to change attacks each time to avoid parry? Other people do it easily enough.
Unknown2005-05-03 13:46:47
It's not bad against a mage or a guardian who uses a shield, when you go against a knight parry then its freaking!!
Marsu2005-05-03 13:53:26
Nerf parry!
Unknown2005-05-03 14:39:17
You don't need to nerf parry, they just need to fix how much damage a knight can do against one another, without the aide of artifact runes
Typhus2005-05-10 13:18:27
Add a sigil which protects your equipment it is attached to from adverse outside effects? Like protecting a shield from being smashed to bits, and giving a % resistance to diluting what is in a vial, or just protecting it altogether? Maybe making the comms to make sigil be around 800ish?
Shiri2005-05-10 19:11:57
QUOTE(Guardian_Shiro @ May 3 2005, 02:46 PM)
It's not bad against a mage or a guardian who uses a shield, when you go against a knight parry then its freaking!!Â
112642
And if you go against a warrior that uses a shield (you can't be talking about a warrior using weaponparry, because YOU CAN'T SHIELDSMASH weapons) then they have no way to even dent you because they're only using one weapon. You're clearly talking out of your shoe.