Unknown2005-05-31 23:34:15
QUOTE(daganev @ May 27 2005, 08:43 AM)
Its odd because I took my girlfriend to the hospital for surgey, and all she had to do was put my name on a list and I was able to go with her the whole time, even during "family only" hours.
So I'm not really quite sure what being married has to do with hospital visits...
So I'm not really quite sure what being married has to do with hospital visits...
126002
Odd. Because according to the Supreme Court's Delegation in 1974, August 3rd on 3:01 PM, they ruled that only "those of kin and blood delineation may accompany another into medical circles that are of the United States ruling". (You can find this at Section D-24 Arizona Vs. Stewart LeMarble) The only other point this law becomes nulled and void is if you're a blood donor or donating another physical body part of departing care on the patient being hospitalized.
That paper you signed was what most medical practices, if not all, call an "Indoor-Patient Policy", which state that only family members or donors may accompany the patient into the E.M.'s or ICU and their rooms. So how you got into the hospital is beyond me. That was breaking a very big law, on the hospital's part.
Unknown2005-05-31 23:37:04
QUOTE(daganev @ May 27 2005, 09:30 AM)
2 of the 4 points listed there had to do with hospital and medical issues. the first one had to do with property wich I'm sure you can sign a piece of paper and get that done also.
Are those 4 points the issues at hand or not?
point 4 is also not currently true. It is illegal to fire someone on any ground other than fuffilling the duties of the job.
Are those 4 points the issues at hand or not?
point 4 is also not currently true. It is illegal to fire someone on any ground other than fuffilling the duties of the job.
126032
Not according to the Supreme Court, Daganev. Look it up at the Library of Congress. You should be able to find it under the Category of "D", where all ethical/cultural rulings by the Supreme Court are filed under.
Daganev2005-06-01 05:53:04
Your confusing the difference with defacto standards and the ability for any person to grant and wave rights with forethouth.
If a person signs a document saying they want so and so in thier hospital room with them, you can't dissalow them unless they are in the way of treatment.
Clergy and CHaplins are not members of the family but are most definitly allowed to be there as is a person's lawyer.
If a person signs a document saying they want so and so in thier hospital room with them, you can't dissalow them unless they are in the way of treatment.
Clergy and CHaplins are not members of the family but are most definitly allowed to be there as is a person's lawyer.
