Nope, we're on the equivalent of DST. (Or we may be off it, point is hour clocks got moved forward/back. I forget which. Ask Shiri)

1/2 is better than 0/2.

If they were both guilty, that is.

That's not equality.

THE FLAMER HAS LANDED. I REPEAT, THE FLAMER HAS LANDED.

Err, I mean, the King of Pop has arrived to hear his verdict.

I wish he'd stop arsing about waving <.<

Well, I'm going to go run for my car, so I can hear it on the radio. Laters.

If cops only catch 2/4 thieves, do we let the two caught go because its equal? No, we say hey, we got two of 'em!

...if they were guilty, of course.

Not guilty on first 8 counts.

Pardon me while I grab a gun, I have a Michael Jackson to shoot.

And all of them.

It says a lot about the world when a guy can get away with this BOLOGNA because he has a WATERMELON of cash.

-Richter was here. Watch your language

...maybe he just wasn't guilty?

I mean, did he pay the jurrors? *twiddle* Me thinks not.

I'd prefer an innocent go to jail then a guilty go free. God I hate California and the East coast of USA, we need to saw both of them off. Stupid Liberals.

Well maybe so but it all seems very iffy.

Sorry just realised I swore, you can censor that.

Yeah, caught that after I posted.

And Silvanus, an innocent person imprisoned? That's terrible!

Unless the innocent one was you right?

Nice Richter

No. I'd rather have an innocent person, even if it was me, then a murderer, child molester, raper, major theft go free.

That's a fair thing to say IMO.