I wouldn't call that a treaty.

Somebody give that man a prize.

Genius.

How nice of you Ceres. Marry me?

I'm wounded.

Truly.

Ouch Cron.

Cron's post has been deleted. Please, keep personal attacks out of here.

The thread has been edited to remove the bulk of personal attacks in any way, shape, or form.

The next time it happens, it will be locked.

I like this Shikari fellow; a moderator with teeth and a lack of bias.

Mmmmhmmm.

What was this topic about again? I'll go back and check and then I might add something constructive.

EDIT: What is this treaty? I haven't beena round in game much so I haven't heard of it.

Oh and what is everyone's opinion of Glomdoring's progress and chances now?

I personally think it is getting better and I think Shikari is doing a good job of stirring up a little more excitement and improving moods in the place. I would like to see a little more communication on the channels, though.

Random drawing.

Nothing else to do.

hahha that is how I will invision shikari forever!!!

Umm what's the issue with the treaty? I don't know all that much about it yet. Basically Glomdoring stays out of Faethorn and Serenwilde does what... be happy with it? :/

Yeah, it's been misinterpreted and all sorts. But apparently Shikari clarified was that all they wanted was for us not to interfere with their getting Angkrag. Uh, sure, good luck with that. The poll we're having on the subject still has the misunderstood version in it though. Which causes much anger because it sounds like we have to give up a village.

That better not be true. Though it seems to me that you are probably the one who misunderstood, its much more likely that they would ask you to give one of your own villages to them. Since its very hard to promise to give a village that currently belongs to someone else.

You know, it is no wonder nothing ever happens in game. With every one running to the forums/irc to spread the information about what their organisation is doing. You think because you say it OOC that somehow means that it is ok? Sure there will always be someone running their mouth, but for crying out loud, learn to play the game -in- Lusternia not -on- the forums.

As for it being misinterpretated there was no misinterpretation at all. Shikari originally said any village, and the treaty holds as long as they hold the village.

After Gregori posted the referendum, Shikari changed it to tainted village and we only had to not interfere.

Wait wait wait, we're going to try and take Angkrag now?

Well since the cat has been let out of the proverbial bag. Your lovely Patron pretty much put you in a position of having Magnagora kick you around, having Celest kick you around, and Serenwilde gets to sit in the cheap seats and laugh at you all.

If you mean Shikari, I seriously doubt he meant to put us in a situation like that, the inclusion of tainted villages was probably meant much more general, and if you mean Viravain, she hasn't been around at all.

No Thorgal, Shikari meant Acknor or Angkrag. In fact, that is what he said. So enjoy your a** whoopin'.

Gregori, keep your hypocrasy...

I'm not sure what your spewing, but I havn't heard anything like what your suggesting on the forums.