Meh, I dunno about this - there really is no solid proof that Navaryn is tainted 
The only person there really is to be suspicious of for any reason other than inactivity is Munsia. 
Or you could like, claim, and at least try to make us believe you. 
Shorlen
If I have no information to share with you, it's because I wasted every single turn I had (involuntarily, of course. I wouldn't have signed up if I didn't want to play) . I'm certainly more pissed at that than anything else right now.
Suhnaye
If I'm getting defensive, it's because you've been trying to take me down since the beginning with logic such as "He voted No Lynch the whole round. He must be suspect!"
Don't you think that if I was tainted, No Lynch would be the LAST thing I would vote since their goal is to kill off the non-tainted?
Anyway, that post is the last one where I'll try to explain myself. Let the stoning begins!
If I have no information to share with you, it's because I wasted every single turn I had (involuntarily, of course. I wouldn't have signed up if I didn't want to play)
. I'm certainly more pissed at that than anything else right now.Suhnaye
If I'm getting defensive, it's because you've been trying to take me down since the beginning with logic such as "He voted No Lynch the whole round. He must be suspect!"
Don't you think that if I was tainted, No Lynch would be the LAST thing I would vote since their goal is to kill off the non-tainted?Anyway, that post is the last one where I'll try to explain myself. Let the stoning begins!
QUOTE(Shiri @ Oct 5 2005, 06:35 AM)
Or you could like, claim, and at least try to make us believe you.
199242
No way. I totally refuse to claim. The tainted already made a good part of you do so and I won't fall for it.
QUOTE(Navaryn @ Oct 5 2005, 12:37 PM)
Suhnaye
If I'm getting defensive, it's because you've been trying to take me down since the beginning with logic such as "He voted No Lynch the whole round. He must be suspect!" Don't you think that if I was tainted, No Lynch would be the LAST thing I would vote since their goal is to kill off the non-tainted?
Anyway, that post is the last one where I'll try to explain myself. Let the stoning begins!
If I'm getting defensive, it's because you've been trying to take me down since the beginning with logic such as "He voted No Lynch the whole round. He must be suspect!"
Don't you think that if I was tainted, No Lynch would be the LAST thing I would vote since their goal is to kill off the non-tainted?Anyway, that post is the last one where I'll try to explain myself. Let the stoning begins!
199244
No no no. That's rubbish. You're either Tainted or not paying attention. If you vote no lynch every round, what you're voting for is that the elders kill no one, and the Soulless kill someone every night pretty much unstopped. And the Tainted didn't make a good portion of us claim, we did on our own, heh. You're being totally suspicious there. Someone else finish him off, since he doesn't want to claim.
