Unknown2005-10-21 01:36:58
Indeed. Yay death!
No I just don't see the point of sitting around not doing anything. We may aswell get started now, rather than wait another night in which one of us will probably die.
No I just don't see the point of sitting around not doing anything. We may aswell get started now, rather than wait another night in which one of us will probably die.
Kiarlea2005-10-21 01:37:52
*squeak* I wasn't lurking! I wasn't even here! I'm so easily distracted...
You're just voting for me cause my name's hard to spell
I'm going to FoS Quidgy for jumping up to lynch me so quickly.
Edit: I swear I put that / in
You're just voting for me cause my name's hard to spell
I'm going to FoS Quidgy for jumping up to lynch me so quickly.
Edit: I swear I put that / in
Xenthos2005-10-21 01:40:01
QUOTE(Kiarlea @ Oct 20 2005, 09:37 PM)
*squeak* I wasn't lurking! I wasn't even here!
209278
Comments on whether or not to lynch today?
Revan seems to be avoiding it. *pokes Revan*
Revan2005-10-21 01:40:46
I made my comments already, if you haven't noticed
Unknown2005-10-21 01:43:15
Sorry Ms Mod, for all the vote counting I am forcing on you.
Unvote Kiarlea, vote Shadow
Like I said, down with lurkers.
Come one people. I don't want you to bandwagon the people I point at, but if we don't get people talking we learn nothing.
Unvote Kiarlea, vote Shadow
Like I said, down with lurkers.
Come one people. I don't want you to bandwagon the people I point at, but if we don't get people talking we learn nothing.
Xenthos2005-10-21 01:44:06
QUOTE(Revan @ Oct 20 2005, 08:17 PM)
Being as there's absolutely nothing to go by right now, I say we hold off lynching until we get some viable proof against someone. That or we could just blindly accuse...
209241
This is the only comment on that subject you've made- everything else has been asking for scriers to step forward or pointing at Quidgyboo. It'd be nice to get a little more thought than "We can lynch or not lynch."
Kiarlea2005-10-21 01:45:02
Lurky lurky lurky, pfft. If Quidgy keeps voting rather than just poking people to find out if they're actually paying attention or not, I'ma vote for him.
Otherwise, I'm going to vote for no lynch.
Otherwise, I'm going to vote for no lynch.
Kiarlea2005-10-21 01:45:56
Don't wanna hurt the innocents, 'sune might get mad
Revan2005-10-21 01:47:09
Alright, I think I'm going to have to FOS Quidgyboo for his inconsistencies and continued voting for one person, then the next at a whim. It seems that he doesn't really even care and just wants to see bloodshed, which I'm starting to find a little unnerving
Unknown2005-10-21 01:49:07
Not voting on day one is just very very silly. That has been mentioned in every game so far, so you should have picked up on that by now.
If I wanted bloodshed I'd concentrate on one person and try start a bandwagon. To, you know, get them killed? I am just random voting.
If I wanted bloodshed I'd concentrate on one person and try start a bandwagon. To, you know, get them killed? I am just random voting.
Kiarlea2005-10-21 01:53:42
What Quidgy is actually doing is trying to get reactions from people to suss out whether they're suspicious or letting anything on when they're confused or annoyed.
Quidgy for getting things moving, but meh.
Quidgy for getting things moving, but meh.
Revan2005-10-21 01:55:50
Meh, well, I'm going to hold my vote until a few more people step up to the board. Us four is hardly anything to get worked up about, especally since we need 7 to lynch
Unknown2005-10-21 01:56:00
Shh don't give away my secret genius plot!
Unknown2005-10-21 01:58:25
Everyone's alive? Vote Count
Vix: 1 Laneth
Kiarlea: 1 Laneth
Shadow: 1 Laneth
Not voting: Everyone else.
With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch.
Shadow: 1 Laneth
Not voting: Everyone else.
With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch.
Kiarlea2005-10-21 02:00:33
Make your secret genius plot less, well, obvious next time.
Cwin2005-10-21 02:19:03
Ahh, another day 1. I'm agreeing with Quidgy actualy, though I dislike the vote flingings: we do need to get people talking, and it's the votes that do that. On the other hand, I REALY got worried last game when a good 4 citizens had to rolecall, including the protector (which ended up having to protect themselves the whole game to survive). This game, I'm hoping they keep a low profile.
No gut instict, though, except that this game is hiding something VERY freightening: We don't even know WHO we're up against.
No gut instict, though, except that this game is hiding something VERY freightening: We don't even know WHO we're up against.
Cwin2005-10-21 02:23:04
After reading that post, I need to take my own advice.
FOS Shorlen I see you reading this: speak up.
FOS Shorlen I see you reading this: speak up.
Shorlen2005-10-21 02:30:38
QUOTE(Cwin @ Oct 20 2005, 10:23 PM)
After reading that post, I need to take my own advice.
FOS Shorlen I see you reading this: speak up.
FOS Shorlen I see you reading this: speak up.
209312
I was away all day, just got back not five minutes ago and was reading what happened and thinking.
Give me a minute before I vote Laneth for being horribly suspicious. Or don't, I'll just do it now. Those who try to lead the city are often evil. I know I'd do it if I was - oh, wait, I did last game
Unknown2005-10-21 02:31:44
You also voted me every chance you could without looking too suss, remember?
Shorlen2005-10-21 02:37:44
QUOTE(Quidgyboo @ Oct 20 2005, 10:31 PM)
You also voted me every chance you could without looking too suss, remember?
209314
I actually argued your innocence in the beginning for completely made up reasons, if you remember. I'll gladly retract my vote if someone appears to be more suspicious than you.