i dislike when people post allot. make's'um seem suspicious to me. and that you have voted for me, and that you haven't really provided evidence for why you're not tainted. if you had the other points may have been null, but there's a few other people that have.(i mean in writting style, not in anything like having given an object or rolecalled or anything)
Therefore, VOTE: KIARLEA

Last game everyone looked suspicious. Now everyone seems sensible.

It's true though: no lynching hurts in the long run. As such, I'll throw a vote: Laneth since Quid is the most suspicious at the moment. Throw a vote everywhere, then nothing. It's not solid evidence, but it's the best we got so far.

I'm going to Vote: Tsaephai, for the earlier reasons that I raised an eyebrow at him, as well as his recent vote. He'd be right if someone posting a lot was trying to sway opinions, draw people to their side, etc... however, Kiarlea has (so far at least) just been attempting to get us to post more. Discussion can only help us.

Though "voting for someone because they voted for you" seems to be a pretty common event.

OMGUS Vote Count 2

Shadow: 1 Laneth
Laneth : 2 Shorlen, Cwin
Revan: 1 Iridiel
Tsaephai: 2 Kiarlea, Xenthos
Iridiel: 1 Revan
Kiarlea: 1 Tsaephai
No lynch: 2 Shadow, Vix

Not voting: Tsuki, Sylphas

With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch.

Cwin: I changed your vote this time. Next time please unvote first.

Huh, I voted No Lynch earlier. I guess it wasn't in the right format.

Vote: No Lynch

Doesn't look we have a majority anyways.

Oh, and what's an OMGUS?

I was wondering if anyone would ever ask.

OH MY GOD YOU SUCK!

OMGUS votes are those which can be determined as primarily being a vote for someone because they voted for you.

Amusing. And they really are, too.

Nothing to say, huh?

Deadline: Monday, October 24th 12 pm EST.

in that case, let's get someone dead quick, cause we only have two hours!

oi! the way i phrased that it made me sound tainted!

Actually, about a day and a half.

EDIT: Wait, it's Saturday Oct 22 or Monday Oct 24? *confused*

Monday the 24th. I was looking at today's date and thinking 2 days from today but not adding on those 2 days.

Umm, Tsaephai, wanting people to talk doesn't mean I'm scum. It means I want people to give us reasons NOT to vote for them. You being so jumpy and immediately voting for me is just silly. Now my vote will STAY on you.

Discussion helps. The more we talk, the more likely the scum are to slip up and reveal themselves.

I'm here (again). Reading to catch up fully and will then post more than just this. Ibaesha tried beating me a few times yesterday to get me to post then but I kept getting distracted and unable to catch up and post before exhaustion kicked in again.

About darn time someone posted. *glee Tsu*

On the other hand, I saw Cwin here earlier, who didn't comment. *eye Cwin*

And now, more thoughts from me that no one wants to know. I'm writing this as I go along as I see things to comment on in order to actually post before I manage to get caught up in other business again. Glancing ahead, I think some of this was already said.

If a scrier would have proof of an enemy, that would be the only reason why they should consider revealing themselves. The earlier encouragement seemed more general than that, hence my concern ... especially if we have a scrier new to how things tend to work. And the other concerns about having a guardian and having that potential guardian trust the claimed scrier are still valid. It'd be better for a scrier to reveal themselves now with only a tiny bit of knowledge rather than dying, but it'd be better to wait in the hopes of living and gathering more information to reveal first, I feel. Another potential benefit of remaining silent even if a single enemy is known is to be able to see how others react to that enemy's ideas to deduce other likely scrying targets.

Kia's brought up some points:


I'd almost started saying "but they had a free chance during the first night and didn't kill anyone" ... and then I remembered that we could have a roleblocker! My earlier confusion over why no one was killed is now greatly lessened (although I'm of course still lacking certainty). However, if that theory is correct ... Roleblocker!

The latter idea there is ... meh. Disturbing. Just because they haven't done something other than killing before doesn't mean they don't have another objective this time. If it's anything like the objects last game seemed to be for those who had 'em, hopefully they're confused and proceeding nowhere!



Yeesss, and no. The more we talk, the more likely we confuse ourselves as well. Coming in as a replacement last game was deadly trying to catch up with how many pages there'd already been for ... was it only a single day? Or two at most? Discussion is good, but it can hurt (by confusion) as well as help.


Beyond that, I'm wondering where Quidgy is ... his last post was before mine, and I had just over 24hrs between those!

The votes are too scattered to lynch anyone even if the non-voters jump in to lynch (as opposed to voting no-lynch). We have a deadline. If votes become more consolidated before then, I'll certainly consider changing mine. Until then:

Vote no lynch


----------

On an only slightly related note, I'm really going to have to search for all the previous games I've been in and add links to the threads in my signature. Involved in every game since TSG2, including hosting of them. Did I host one or two? I think one had the interest fall away ...

Tsuki

It's not like the lack of talking is clearing anything up though. I'd rather have more to chew on, than nothing.

Silence only helps the scum. I'm sure -they- know who they can trust.

i don't know why you were voting for me then? i was already talking.

and voting for someone who's already talking to try and make them talk more makes no sence.

and i'm not being jumpy, i'm trying to be quick, hardly any information can be found in the first day, we need to get someone killed and then the information is.

i think the second day is the only time that we might possibly not want to lynch.

I'm around, but between not having a lot to say and playing with my new laptop, I've gone a little quiet. I suppose I should unvote shadow since she did speak up and didn't say much to get me suspicious. I still think not linching would be terribly silly though, I am going to go over the past few pages, again, and see what I can come up with.

Well the problem is though.. we might as well hit one of us, so that might not gain us anything either.. Time might be in our favour.. or not, that's the question.