"Your neck".. why not "Our neck"?

Deathscene is done. Go back to page one if you want to see it.

Damnit people, get a job and stop being so pushy .

The only people who strike me as suspicious as of now in no particular order are YoLF, Suhnaye and Dag. Dag's reasoning and methods are shady at best, in my opinion. YoLF is like John Kerry incarnate, and SUhnaye votes "to move things along" as stated in his first post. That doesn't sound like a very intelligent reason to me. Out of the three, though, I'd say Daganev has most of my suspicions, though that may change. He's done little to convince me of his innocence, so I'm upgrading my FoS to Vote Daganev

As I said before, you're being shady, Dag. You've only continued. It's no surprise, and exactly as I'd expect from you - however, I'm going to join Revan and Vote Daganev.

That should be two votes for you.

I'm having trouble imagining scum would be so obvious, though. He is acting exactly as he usually does... though I can't really say what it means either way.

Doesn't really change that he *is* acting like this, and is the best bet we've got so far. I am going to vote: Daganev as well.

The 'you guys really could have added this up yourselves' votecount:

Kiarlea: 1 (Suhanye)
Cwin: 1 (Iridiel)
Suhnaye: 2 (Daganev, Cwin)
Ye of Little Faith: 1 (Narsrim)
Daganev: 3 (Revan, Ye of Little Faith, Xenthos)

With 11 alive it's 6 for the kill.

Where is Karlea?

Is there a point in having them around if you they don't end up voting?

Damn, I'm just a shady guy.

I must say that you all look awfully suspicious. But I think it's the random vote factor that makes everybody look ugly.
Anyway, Kiarlea, you're looking pretty suspicious trying to lurk into the shadows without us noticing... You better say something?
Just don't say you're Timmy as we're not believing that this time

Godsdamn you kids are pushy. It hasn't even been a day, and I'm already scum just for not posting yet?

Don't worry, though, I'll be on all your backs later when you stop posting. Like in stupid TW2.

Are you even planning on voting?

I'm going to FoS: Kiarlea for now, and Vote: Daganev, for pretty much the same reasons as everyone else, though I'm tempted to vote for someone else just to spread out the votes and see if it gets us anywhere.

I can't vote for Dag. It's essentualy saying that a person who's trying to reason out a way to bring a nonrandom vote is immediately guilty. In fact, we do that regularly and usualy end up killing townies. It'll be the scum that wants to kill the 'smart' ones first, after all, so that the rest are just sheep to the slaughter.

No, I'm not saying everyone voting for Dag is scum. I'm thinking that we're getting too paranoid with it. Kiarlea still hasn't defended herself from the accusation and, if Iridiel is right, lurking to boot. Let's see if she can defend herself with more than "How dare you vote for me" semi-threats, THEN we can worry about Dag.

I don't feel so bad about Suhnaye though, but I can't get myself to switch votes quite yet.

Cwin has a point, but more importantly, YoLF was pretty quick on jumping on my vote for Daganev. YoLF jumps here and there, and it seems now, to me, that he's more suspicious than Daganev. So with that, I'm going to Unvote Daganev and Vote YoLF

Kiarlea got very defensive in answer to a simple suggestion of lurking.
unvote cwin;vote Kiarlea
It may just be newbieness, or just cornered scumbag reaction.
But also FoS Daganev and YoLF.
Daganev because he makes very short posts pushing people and YoLF because he's jumping too fast to bandwagon. If I was mafia and I knew we were lynching an innocent I would be rubbing my hands and yelling LYNCH THEM!!. Only thing is, I think YoLF is experienced enough not to be so obvious.

Oddly enough, strong mafia will tend to never start bandwagons, since it puts them in the spotlight. They also try not to be too silent since lurkers are pointed out as well.

My goal last game was to become a sensible townie, trying to derail bad logic and lead the public towards better alternatives, and just not mention those few tidbits the townies need to find out the final answer. Such mafia are almost impossible to spot if done right on Day 1 (can't say I did it right though). After a few days, you can catch the almost-perfect knowledge they threw out that seemed sensible but had that bit O lie that turns it all into poison.

Thus why it's good we're talking in Day 1: it'll help come day 2-3. For now, I think we have enough information (what little there is) to leave randomvoting to just the lurkers and start working on the ones who are truly suspicious.

The good and sensible townie... Like you're doing now?

Hadn't even been a damn day yet when I posted the first time, yeesh. You'd think I wasn't allowed to do anything but stare at the thread all day! I get distraa.... Ooh, shiny.

Anyhows, I'm going to throw in my (late) random vote....

vote Sylphas cause you've been even quieter than me as far as I can tell. Meh.

Voting me because I haven't posted that much (when it's frigging 2am in the morning my time, thanks guys) is stupid, especially if you look at who I was in my last game.


And I wrote this before you posted, Dag, but hell, those damn shinies got my attention again.

And Dagnaev, STFU. I'm not the only one who hadn't bloody voted yet when you posted that.

*caches up on the rest*