Morik2005-12-05 00:19:23
QUOTE(Cwin @ Dec 5 2005, 05:42 AM)
A guild congluting in their 'own plane' makes sense, but would help to weaken the conflict levels off-plane (which, IMO, need to be strengthened). Essentualy, you're giving a free Conglut to defenders and making all attackers who aren't trans suffer. Faethron and the Sea battles have taught me that low-defense/high-offense is a much better way to go than high-defense.
So, as much as I would LOVE to not lose a batch of exp fighting people who won't lose much at all, I think we're stuck with having to Trans to conglut.
So, as much as I would LOVE to not lose a batch of exp fighting people who won't lose much at all, I think we're stuck with having to Trans to conglut.
232654
Why? You're choosing to raid. Those who raid are already taking risks in being there. The defenders though - they're the ones that have to pray. Hence Conglutination inside defending villages.
Cwin2005-12-05 00:45:01
Make a note, though, that raids aren't all too common actions for the majority of the population. While that in itself isn't bad, giving a strong enough advantage to defense in the higher planes will further erode the locations where violent conflict will occur.
To put to another way, if you knew you would pray in a raid but your defenders can all Conglut and rush back in, how oftain would you raid?
Myself, I want non-prime conflict and lots of it. For it, I believe if, say, Celest attacks Nil, that Mag would rather think more about a counter raid than to utterly stop the attack.
To put to another way, if you knew you would pray in a raid but your defenders can all Conglut and rush back in, how oftain would you raid?
Myself, I want non-prime conflict and lots of it. For it, I believe if, say, Celest attacks Nil, that Mag would rather think more about a counter raid than to utterly stop the attack.
