After re-reading all the posts, what do you think of the claim of requiem (right before going silent again) of being Ialie?

Also, I noticed Cwin telling us all to go Ur'Guard. A lapsus?

And Shorlen is scary. Shorlen, do you like peanuts?

I didn't find anything else interesting.

The only problem I see to your reasoning is that at least to me Shamarah makes sense. More sense than Fritzler, or Shorlen, or all those silent people who do nothing and just observe.

And still, nobody has investigated into Requiem's claim (or at least, nobody has publically said anything) nor on Xenthos coming back to life.

In fact, we know Xenthos is innocent (he was Nejii) but we don't know if he's still innocent... Maybe this killing and coming back to life is some kind of Vampire cult?

Arrrgh too complicated!

I believe him so far. I havn't seen anything else saying otherwise, though I'm willing to listen to such.

Me telling everyone to go to Ur'Guard is because I'm the Guild Admin there IG. I'm no Murphy, but I'm not bad at keeping people in line and unsilly.

Even though "I" am silly myself.. oh well, hypocrism is good RP.


Shorlen, I'm 'void' on.. she's under my radar at the moment, since I've been watching other people. I need to go back and take a look at her posts, though.

She says that she loves people, and acts incredibly childish. She atracts attention to herself, wich would be a bad move if she was scum, but at the same time would be a good move because we could outguess her and think she cannot be mafia if she attracts so much attention to herself.
Definitly:
Vote Shorlen

OMG Shorlen saying I love you and stuff like that, could that be hints of a cult?

I am being paranoid. The more I think, the more I feel paranoid.


Is there a mechanism to avoid doubleposting? I make fast replies and it acts as if I had edited my previous post

Honestly, it'd be just a BIT too obvious to kill someone and then raise them again as scum. Everyone sees it happening. As far as I know, cults prefer a bit more of the "cloak and dagger" approach, instead of airing their affairs for everybody to see.

I have to admit that Cwin's comments on Shamarah do have me intrigued, however. I'm not sure if it truly says he is scum, or if he's just trying to fit in until he feels it is time to make his presence felt. Either way, I'd like to hear from him.

Everybody sees it happening and as everybody sees it happening everybody thinks it's too obvious and then does nothing.

It's complicated.

Anyway, I am not voting for you yet.

It tends to merge the posts together. If you have to post twice in a row, make sure the second post begins with --------------------- or some other separator, to signify that it's a new one. Also, stating that it is a second post helps.

Part of it is because it's Mafia. The rest:



You're starting to see why I felt that early on. Death and Rebirth.. UGGGG.

I don't believe Bob Marley died from cancer
31 years ago i woulda been a panther
They killed Huey cause they knew he had the answer
The views that you see from Kiarlea is propaganda

Singing:
Telling lies, to our vision
Telling lies, to our children
Telling lies, to our babies
Only truth, can take us away



I'm pretty sure we're not dealing with a cult in a game where allegiance isn't revealed. That'd just be mean.


*points to the past 15 pages*


Huggle Kiarlea


que? Que?

that was my spanish lil' john

SI!

I think that the giggling of the murderer implicates shorlen. And i'm wondering, also, if the scum are allong with the tainted people in this game. It seems to me that it would be more likely for tainted to be against Lady Lisaera, and so navaryn having been torak(whom i believe is tainted? please correct me if i'm wronge) might show he was one of the scum? Although, that brings the question why would the scum kill one of their own? Perhaps a serial killer is shorlen? Much to think about.

Don't read too much into a nightscene, it's just flavor.

So are we letting shammarah claim before we lynch him?

i'm sorry, i fell asleep. i'm soooo sorry, i'll never do it again. i promise. look from now on, i'll check to see what's going on every day. no, every hour. i'll be perfect, you'll see.

i'm not suspicous, i just like people, is that so wrong?

but shamarah has. he's been trying to kill people and stuff, and not giving good reasons for it, and that's wrong. vote shamarah.

------

and YAY! Xenny's back! i knew he couldn't stay away from me

The fact that Shorlen first asks Shamarah and then tries to kill him and never adresses the fact that she has my vote still makes me more suspicious of her.

She's creating chaos and misleading us.

And makes me nervous.

omg, what do you want me to say? i'm not creating anything, listen to what i've said, omg.

i said that xenthos was innocent, and he was.
i said that requiem and shamarah are suspicious, and they are.

that's all i said. the rest is just talk, geeze.

Actually, he was dead. We didn't receive any information on his afiliation. We don't know if he was scum or townie. The fact that you give for granted that he's innocent doesn't prove anything. Or do you know something the others don't?

you know.. it doesn't help my argument when one person who agrees says little to defend it, and another is looking even more scummy.

BAH! FoS: Shorlen

I would *hope* that my affiliation is somewhat obvious, Iridiel... I'd be a burnt crisp by now if I was against Her. Regents tend to be in the spotlight.

While I'm waiting to hear from Shamarah, at this point it is seeming apparent that Iridiel is once again walking down a self-destructive path. vote: Iridiel. You've selected one person you dislike and are doing everything that you can to discredit them. While Shorlen may or may not be scum, your entire style is bent on overpowering and destroying, not on actually learning any useful information.

Actually, Xenthos, I am trying to find out wich useful information Shorlen has.

From what I've seen, she's just confusing us more and more by using strange argumetns.

Of course, you're free to vote for me, who is at least trying to figure out things.

Regarding afiliations, maybe you as a regent know more about what's that with the peanuts?

Alas, no. I, like the rest of you, have been left in the dark. Nor was my death all that enlightening... no bright lights, no wondrously beneficial information whispered in my ear by the Fates.

This means that when I vote, I am doing so not because I have "inside information," but because I feel something needs to be examined.

Hmm, i agree with iridiel, something is very odd with shorlen, therefore, not to kill shorlen, but rather to get a roleclaim, i'm voteing for shorlen aswell.
VOTE: SHORLEN