Unknown2006-03-02 23:25:56
QUOTE(Athana @ Mar 2 2006, 05:54 PM) 264471
Why would you stick around and let two warriors assualt on you? If Narsrim had known that everyone was dead he probably would have ran...but I still think some people do insane wounding
People keep bringing this up.
"Everyone should run from a warrior, and if they stay around long enough for 1 combo then they should expect to die"
I should have made an Ur'gaurd.
Narsrim2006-03-02 23:31:06
Ixion,
You inability to comprehend let alone process information is frightening. The point to this log is that it is possible to behead in 2 assaults.
And truly, if you want to talk smack on anyone curing, I totally destroy you 1-on-1 as does Geb, I'm sure on of us has some logs where we can show where you fail to correctly cure something too.
You inability to comprehend let alone process information is frightening. The point to this log is that it is possible to behead in 2 assaults.
And truly, if you want to talk smack on anyone curing, I totally destroy you 1-on-1 as does Geb, I'm sure on of us has some logs where we can show where you fail to correctly cure something too.
Yrael2006-03-02 23:54:54
QUOTE
You remove 10 sparkleberry, bringing the total in the Rift to 1366.
I hope you die.
In a fire.
*screams*
Narsrim2006-03-03 00:16:28
QUOTE(Yrael @ Mar 2 2006, 06:54 PM) 264542
I hope you die.
In a fire.
*screams*
I normally have 1800+, I just gave some away recently.
CODE
Glancing into the Rift, you see:
  arnica            bluetint          calamus
  chervil            colewort          coltsfoot
  faeleaf            flax              galingale
  horehound          juniper            kafe
  kombu              marjoram          merbloom
  mercury            mistletoe          myrtle
  pennyroyal        reishi            rosehips
  sage              sargassum          sparkleberry
  spices            weed              wood
  wormwood          yarrow
Athana2006-03-03 00:26:28
QUOTE
I hope you die.
In a fire.
*screams*
In a fire.
*screams*
If it makes you feel better he IS an herbalist
Yrael2006-03-03 00:28:54
I still want him to die. That many herbs belong rightfully in one place, my posession.
Narsrim2006-03-03 00:33:56
QUOTE(Athana @ Mar 2 2006, 07:26 PM) 264557
If it makes you feel better he IS an herbalist
For 2 days I was an alchemist for a long time, a jeweler for a bit, and now a herbalist.
Geb2006-03-03 00:43:49
QUOTE(Athana @ Mar 2 2006, 11:54 PM) 264471
Why would you stick around and let two warriors assualt on you? If Narsrim had known that everyone was dead he probably would have ran...but I still think some people do insane wounding
You state that like it is not possible for two warriors to assault a person’s head in quick succession. It is not like they have to worry about razing the person’s shield or rebounding. Parry would not hinder their combo either. The difficulty level for two warriors to each pull of a head assault on a person is next to nil.
Unknown2006-03-03 01:03:57
Well we all know that sweep and assault shouldnt give behead and most likely the admins will change is since its a major problem. Maybe hopefully they will give us disembowel and fix axelord a bit but at least you can expect the behead problem fixed. Also Murphy's wounding is just sick all together, damn I bonecrushers.
Shryke2006-03-03 01:18:18
Aye, I will state it again.. Once we have another option for a kill, nerf behead, I have no problem with that... But currently I couldn't even damage kill you with you completely hindered and a fire rune (Narsrim).. In conclusion: 1v1 Axelord and Pureblade are balanced, but in groups, behead through a shield is just wrong.. Of course if you took that away AL and PB's would be completely terrible 1v1... Therefore we should have more chest and gut afflictions, as well as either making behead harder, or nerfing assault a bit.
QED
QED
Unknown2006-03-03 01:45:09
QUOTE(Shryke @ Mar 2 2006, 08:18 PM) 264594
Aye, I will state it again.. Once we have another option for a kill, nerf behead, I have no problem with that... But currently I couldn't even damage kill you with you completely hindered and a fire rune (Narsrim).. In conclusion: 1v1 Axelord and Pureblade are balanced, but in groups, behead through a shield is just wrong.. Of course if you took that away AL and PB's would be completely terrible 1v1... Therefore we should have more chest and gut afflictions, as well as either making behead harder, or nerfing assault a bit.
QED
Pssh, dont add Axelord to that list we arnt balanced 1v1 yet but hopefully if my envoy added my suggestions we will be.
Unknown2006-03-03 01:54:00
QUOTE(Wesmin @ Mar 2 2006, 11:25 PM) 264508
People keep bringing this up.
"Everyone should run from a warrior, and if they stay around long enough for 1 combo then they should expect to die"
I should have made an Ur'gaurd.
That is the intent behind warriors. They are designed to be far superior in 1v1 combat.
Shamarah2006-03-03 01:55:49
QUOTE(Avaer @ Mar 2 2006, 08:54 PM) 264612
That is the intent behind warriors. They are designed to be far superior in 1v1 combat.
I still fail to understand where you got that idea, because it's completely silly.
Unknown2006-03-03 02:45:44
QUOTE
You say, "So warriors have greater offence and defence, and everyone else deals, got it."
Accursed Torak, The Fist of Luciphage says, "Class defence is fine."
Accursed Torak, The Fist of Luciphage says, "Warriors are easy to hinder."
Lisaera, the Empyrean Mother says, "Yes, basically."
The Talons of Crow, Champion Xavius d'Iasani Treeripper says, "It's not fine, but it only needs
tweaks."
The corners of your mouth turn up as you grin mischievously.
Lisaera, the Empyrean Mother says, "Warriors are meant to be hell to stand toe to toe with."
Narsrim nods his head emphatically.
Ur'Warlord Daevos Feyranti, the Dragon of Midnight says, "Would despute the great offense opinion."
Warden Diamante, of the Lunar Veradin says, "Druids are designed to be on the move."
You say, "All combat is toe-to-toe."
Ur'Warlord Daevos Feyranti, the Dragon of Midnight says, "Greater even."
Accursed Torak, The Fist of Luciphage says, "But it is managable if you play your cards right."
Warden Diamante, of the Lunar Veradin says, "Thats not true."
You say, "But ok."
Lisaera, the Empyrean Mother says, "Guardians and mages are meant to be hinderers."
Narsrim2006-03-03 02:46:52
That's inaccurate. Warriors were never designed to kill people in two attacks. They were designed to be tanking and be offensively effective. There is a HUGE difference.
Ixion2006-03-03 02:52:05
I would hope Lisaera meant warriors are 'hell to stand toe to toe with' if unhindered. Otherwise I just don't see it.
Murphy2006-03-03 02:58:37
QUOTE(Narsrim @ Mar 3 2006, 06:10 AM) 264304
Note that he also gave a concussion in 2 combos. I swear, that's just wrong.
Amaru told me he didn't have his hood up in that fight.
I ALWAYS give concussion on the 2nd or 3rd combo if someone doesn't have their hood up, that's how I can tell.
Amaru also ran 58567439 times in that fight, running is expected on high head wounds and on inquisition which is retarded.
EDIT: The next time i hear you say "Oh I got beheaded and I was stancing, parry, shield, touching myself, touching munsia, dancing a jig i'm going to beat you with a tyre iron. Dead set, we know the skill goes through it. You have to hinder people in group combat, IE you see a pureblade in a fight and your head takes a good hit, then you need to webwhore and do all your other hindering tricks to the person who can behead you.
Unknown2006-03-03 03:24:59
On that note, why can warriors hinder so effectively? Shouldn't they be more restricted to pure damage-causing afflictions?
Impaling is one of the best hindering abilities that exists, then there is webbing (everyone has access to it), stunning (again, one of the best hindering abilities), paralysis envenomed on weapons, concussion, broken legs, etc etc etc.
Impaling is one of the best hindering abilities that exists, then there is webbing (everyone has access to it), stunning (again, one of the best hindering abilities), paralysis envenomed on weapons, concussion, broken legs, etc etc etc.
Narsrim2006-03-03 03:25:53
How do you hinder someone who is size 1 Murph? He writhes 3x faster than I can web.
Murphy2006-03-03 03:35:09
QUOTE(Narsrim @ Mar 3 2006, 01:25 PM) 264677
How do you hinder someone who is size 1 Murph? He writhes 3x faster than I can web.
-cast stormhammer at narsrim-
Size is already being looked at in envoys, so don't be a goose. Still you need to focus your attacks, shy not shieldstun instead of web?