ENVOY REPORTS

by Ashteru

Back to Common Grounds.

Rakor2008-06-09 18:22:18
QUOTE(Asmodea @ Jun 9 2008, 06:10 AM) 519542
Has Sobbing Dread and Wrathful Canticle always been in Necroscream?


Sobbing Dread has, Wrathful Canticle was added when all the bard guilds got their new skills.
Shiri2008-06-10 00:42:38
Were any of those skills the lame attrition hunger one, btw?
Ryleth2008-06-10 08:54:39
Actually that is a point, now that necroscream has moved towards revolving around plague afflictions and keeping them incurable. I assume that the hunger affliction songs are to removed? Move the guild completely away from them and prevent the guild being perfectly viable in short fights and virtually unstoppable in long fights.
Shiri2008-06-10 09:08:31
Apparently no, that didn't get addressed. Maybe it was an oversight, and the next envoys can get Magnagoran consent and have it fixed in the next report.
Malarious2008-06-10 09:33:48
QUOTE(Ryleth @ Jun 10 2008, 04:54 AM) 519894
Actually that is a point, now that necroscream has moved towards revolving around plague afflictions and keeping them incurable. I assume that the hunger affliction songs are to removed? Move the guild completely away from them and prevent the guild being perfectly viable in short fights and virtually unstoppable in long fights.


Sickeningplague was not altered to no longer do hunger.

Hunger should be a longer term tactic, (they starve while hearing only, and most offense can easily be escaped by using earwort and tumbling sad.gif)

If you have a long term fight you will need fight, otherwise hunger wont even be an effect. In a long fight plague afflictions will have a limited effect but not be an end all beat all by any means. Worms would be an entirely useless aff without hunger as well.

I think the cacophony have been made rather useful now, and are far far more focused on their song effects than the amalgamation they once were. Kudos to the admin happy.gif

EDIT: Cant sleep yet sad.gif
Shiri2008-06-10 09:37:49
You're hearing an awful lot of the time against a bard (and why wouldn't they undeaf you? Not like there isn't still a large stun on it.) So long as they still have easy hunger access like that long-term attrition fights will be imbalanced in the bard's favour. Spiritsingers are working to remove this aspect from their skillset, quite rightly too.

Worms probably does need something extra to do though. Bards aren't the only ones that give it and the others don't rely on hunger (e.g slaugh, hexen in general, ur'guard with contagion, etc.)
Malarious2008-06-10 09:45:17
QUOTE(Shiri @ Jun 10 2008, 05:37 AM) 519903
You're hearing an awful lot of the time against a bard (and why wouldn't they undeaf you? Not like there isn't still a large stun on it.) So long as they still have easy hunger access like that long-term attrition fights will be imbalanced in the bard's favour. Spiritsingers are working to remove this aspect from their skillset, quite rightly too.

Worms probably does need something extra to do though. Bards aren't the only ones that give it and the others don't rely on hunger (e.g slaugh, hexen in general, ur'guard with contagion, etc.)


It should be like 2 minutes or so to starve, at which point food puts you back to full. Yes worms needs to have a use if its not supposed to support hunger (it makes eating something not count toward hunger, thats is).

I would be all for Caco having 0 long term tactics if their short term wasnt so ferked in general sad.gif Go go earwort/tumble?

<3 Caco
Shiri2008-06-10 09:52:49
Well, they just got a glamours fix and a bunch of song buffs. I wouldn't stick with the conclusion that they're "still" weak until it's been tested more thoroughly.

As for worms...there are a whole bunch of things it could do, like damping sips slightly or taking 2 seconds of purgative balance to cure (and always being cured first) or whatever.
That said, I am not convinced Cacophony offence hinges enough on worms that if hunger was changed they would be totally gimped. This is a secondary issue at best.
Malarious2008-06-10 12:14:50
QUOTE(Shiri @ Jun 10 2008, 05:52 AM) 519906
Well, they just got a glamours fix and a bunch of song buffs. I wouldn't stick with the conclusion that they're "still" weak until it's been tested more thoroughly.

As for worms...there are a whole bunch of things it could do, like damping sips slightly or taking 2 seconds of purgative balance to cure (and always being cured first) or whatever.
That said, I am not convinced Cacophony offence hinges enough on worms that if hunger was changed they would be totally gimped. This is a secondary issue at best.


Worms is useless and its... one of, five plague afflictions I think?

I do like the purgative idea though.

They dont hinge on worms at all, its just one of their plague affs (for flavour more than anything, its in there because its 'contagionish', not because they have a use for it... nor does anyone sleep.gif).
Ardmore2008-06-10 12:29:11
Have food on you and whatthe.gif you don't have to worry about hunger!

And that's why bards need a kill that isn't damage... and discordantchord needs fixing.
Shiri2008-06-10 12:43:29
QUOTE(Ardmore @ Jun 10 2008, 01:29 PM) 519934
Have food on you and whatthe.gif you don't have to worry about hunger!

And that's why bards need a kill that isn't damage... and discordantchord needs fixing.


The victim of a hungering bard runs out of food very quickly no matter how well they fight. Conversely, several classes have no realistic way to make you lose no matter however well you fight.

Besides, if hunger is all that useless until the running around hindering until they run out of food cripples them, there'll be no problem with tweaking it to do something else anyway.

@Malarious: Right. Worms isn't that critical. You said this:
QUOTE
If you have a long term fight you will need fight, otherwise hunger wont even be an effect. In a long fight plague afflictions will have a limited effect but not be an end all beat all by any means. Worms would be an entirely useless aff without hunger as well.
as if it mattered, so I acknowledged that on some level it does and dismissed it as especially relevant to clear the issue up. Worms could stand a change anyway, but it doesn't have a lot to do with whether the cacophony hunger song and similar effects should be changed or not.
Malarious2008-06-10 13:47:16
@Malarious: Right. Worms isn't that critical. You said this:
QUOTE

QUOTE
If you have a long term fight you will need fight, otherwise hunger wont even be an effect. In a long fight plague afflictions will have a limited effect but not be an end all beat all by any means. Worms would be an entirely useless aff without hunger as well.

as if it mattered, so I acknowledged that on some level it does and dismissed it as especially relevant to clear the issue up. Worms could stand a change anyway, but it doesn't have a lot to do with whether the cacophony hunger song and similar effects should be changed or not.


When 20% of your offense (1 in 5 affs) is entirely useless that can have an effect based on the tic of the luck (stupidity comes to mind).

If worms did something useful so all the afflictions might have some purpose.. then by all means. While worms only does something for hunger, and is therefore rather useless you need some synergy for it .

Its not 'required' but it is kind of essential (whole having 20% useless offense again).
Shiri2008-06-10 13:53:20
It is not "20% useless offence." If it comes from a song, it is a 1/5 chance for a single passive ability out of several others on a 10 second tick to be useless. You're screwing the cacophony out of 2 seconds of purgative balance out of just under every minute. It's not a reason to avert a change for the better.
Xenthos2008-06-10 14:01:46
QUOTE(Malarious @ Jun 10 2008, 09:47 AM) 519950
@Malarious: Right. Worms isn't that critical. You said this:

as if it mattered, so I acknowledged that on some level it does and dismissed it as especially relevant to clear the issue up. Worms could stand a change anyway, but it doesn't have a lot to do with whether the cacophony hunger song and similar effects should be changed or not.
When 20% of your offense (1 in 5 affs) is entirely useless that can have an effect based on the tic of the luck (stupidity comes to mind).

If worms did something useful so all the afflictions might have some purpose.. then by all means. While worms only does something for hunger, and is therefore rather useless you need some synergy for it .

Its not 'required' but it is kind of essential (whole having 20% useless offense again).

See: Crow Spit.
Argument: Dismissed.
Malarious2008-06-10 14:16:16
QUOTE(Xenthos @ Jun 10 2008, 10:01 AM) 519953
See: Crow Spit.
Argument: Dismissed.


Counter: Dismissed

Fix the skill or admit it wasnt particularly made to be useful tongue.gif

When your offense is plague affs, they should do somethin
Kaervas2008-06-10 14:22:34
Quit making out that somehow Cacophony offense is crap when it's quite the opposite, it's getting quite tiring.
Xenthos2008-06-10 14:25:56
QUOTE(Malarious @ Jun 10 2008, 10:16 AM) 519955
Counter: Dismissed

Fix the skill or admit it wasnt particularly made to be useful tongue.gif

When your offense is plague affs, they should do somethin

Uh, a lot of Crow skills weren't particularly made to be useful except as flavour. I think that's been admitted for quite some time now.

Still, passive diseases > active diseases (so while doing them, you can't do anything else). It's not like it hurts you, and don't forget that worms is also: Hexes, various Night skills, etc. It can't really be buffed without buffing them.

(Somehow, I get the feeling that you didn't really forget that, but just didn't feel like mentioning it...)
Celina2008-06-10 18:25:02
QUOTE(Xenthos @ Jun 10 2008, 09:01 AM) 519953
See: Crow Spit.
Argument: Dismissed.


pissed.gif

Another thing on Crow's list of useless crap.
Malarious2008-06-10 18:30:03
QUOTE(Kaervas @ Jun 10 2008, 10:22 AM) 519956
Quit making out that somehow Cacophony offense is crap when it's quite the opposite, it's getting quite tiring.


I didnt say its crap. I pointed out specific issues (worms, no long term target, etc) but I have never said they ae crap, nor have I said they are a particularly bad guild etc.

QUOTE(Xenthos @ Jun 10 2008, 10:25 AM) 519957
Uh, a lot of Crow skills weren't particularly made to be useful except as flavour. I think that's been admitted for quite some time now.

Still, passive diseases > active diseases (so while doing them, you can't do anything else). It's not like it hurts you, and don't forget that worms is also: Hexes, various Night skills, etc. It can't really be buffed without buffing them.

(Somehow, I get the feeling that you didn't really forget that, but just didn't feel like mentioning it...)


Crow just sucks sad.gif it has no love.

Worms is from alot of sources and does nothing in any of them! Think I have it as an investment for demon even sleep.gif
Xenthos2008-06-10 20:03:01
QUOTE(Malarious @ Jun 10 2008, 02:30 PM) 520004
Crow just sucks sad.gif it has no love.

Actually, I asked for it to get a special report, and I've been told that'll likely be possible (though at the end of the large list). (PS: That means if you *coughAshaiCelinacough* have suggestions for the various skills and tweaking, this is probably a good time to send a list to Xavius and myself)