Shamarah2006-05-14 16:29:39
QUOTE(ferlas @ May 14 2006, 12:27 PM) 287985
As you say I wasnt in celest when he was punished but I have seen logs concerning why someone who killed shammy on the water plane was unenemied "Because he kind of had a reason to kill a celest cit on our home plane," and the log as to why he was powerbanned which seems exceptionally harsh.
No, you haven't, because that never happened as far as I can remember
ferlas2006-05-14 16:31:13
QUOTE(Diamante @ May 14 2006, 03:45 PM) 287957
And the policy has never been "don't raid" it is, "don't raid with magnagorans" because we try to keep to the angle that glomdoring and magnagora are neutral parties.
Actually glomdoring has been told not to raid celest, they are running an appeasement policy to serenwilde at the moment which also indirectly means they dont annoy glomdoring with the fae so we've been told not to raid celestial planes.
QUOTE(Shamarah @ May 14 2006, 05:29 PM) 287986
No, you haven't, because that never happened as far as I can remember
Wasnt it you who got killed by narsrim on the water plane, then you enemied narsrim then catarin unenemied narsrim with like a page long explaination about why it was ok for him kill you in the log?
Or am I like mixing it up with someone else?
Arissa2006-05-14 16:39:32
QUOTE(ferlas @ May 14 2006, 04:31 PM) 287987
Wasnt it you who got killed by narsrim on the water plane, then you enemied narsrim then catarin unenemied narsrim with like a page long explaination about why it was ok for him kill you in the log?
Or am I like mixing it up with someone else?
No Shamarah got attack on ETHEREAL, perhaps you should confirm your claims before you come make Celest look bad here.
Hazar2006-05-14 16:44:04
"OMG, like, those Glomagora griefers? They're totally dissing on us in this thread. Let's quick, like, go and yell right back at them. Because that, like, always takes care of things."
Ashteru2006-05-14 16:47:40
QUOTE(Arissa @ May 14 2006, 04:39 PM) 287988
No Shamarah got attack on ETHEREAL, perhaps you should confirm your claims before you come make Celest look bad here.
He was killed on Water too, dear.
Hazar2006-05-14 16:49:54
No! Ashteru, you're just trying to make Celest look bad. Obviously, all flaws in Celest's state of affairs are purely superficial and do not reflect any deep-seated abnormalities. Conversely, all flaws in Glomdoring or Magnagora's state of affairs are highly telling and reveal deep-seated abnormalities.
Arissa2006-05-14 16:49:59
QUOTE(Ashteru @ May 14 2006, 04:47 PM) 287993
He was killed on Water too, dear.
QUOTE(Shamarah @ May 14 2006, 04:29 PM) 287986
No, you haven't, because that never happened as far as I can remember
Shamarah2006-05-14 16:51:52
QUOTE(Ashteru @ May 14 2006, 12:47 PM) 287993
He was killed on Water too, dear.
...
No, I wasn't.
Ashteru2006-05-14 16:56:38
QUOTE(Shamarah @ May 14 2006, 04:51 PM) 287997
...
No, I wasn't.
you died like twice that day, boy. You even complained on Bellator about it. *eye*
Hazar2006-05-14 16:57:12
Aha! Now, add shouts of Glomnagoran bias. Throw in some 'you did this to us too' cries, mix, heat, add in some spice, and you have Lusternian Forums pie.
Ildaudid2006-05-14 17:35:42
Let's get this back on track... It doesn't need to turn into a Celest bash thread... we have enough of those and we dont need Celestians tryin to turn a simple vote into another one of those... Sooooo Sham.... tell us which way you are leaning...
Daganev2006-05-14 18:20:35
I would like to request that Shamarah NOT reveal on this thread what he plans to do... sheesh!
Revan2006-05-14 18:25:55
Request denied
Furien2006-05-14 18:31:33
Go Glomdoring. I just found out how unbelievably cool it is to be eaten by a Wyrm and barfed up countless times in a minute. Yay...Glommies?
Razenth2006-05-14 18:49:41
What's Illyrias?
Arix2006-05-14 19:27:29
A new MUD. go to www.persistentrealms.com
Shamarah2006-05-15 22:29:48
Think I've decided between 3 options. I'll pick one once this stupid disfavor of Terentia's wears off and I can actually play again.
But as to what some other people have been saying on this thread: Why is it that Glomdoring feels the need to restrain itself to being an "RP org"? Why can't you foster strong RP and fighters at the same time?
But as to what some other people have been saying on this thread: Why is it that Glomdoring feels the need to restrain itself to being an "RP org"? Why can't you foster strong RP and fighters at the same time?
Daganev2006-05-15 22:36:13
QUOTE(Shamarah @ May 15 2006, 03:29 PM) 288394
Think I've decided between 3 options. I'll pick one once this stupid disfavor of Terentia's wears off and I can actually play again.
But as to what some other people have been saying on this thread: Why is it that Glomdoring feels the need to restrain itself to being an "RP org"? Why can't you foster strong RP and fighters at the same time?
Our skills don't allow it.
Shamarah2006-05-15 22:37:24
QUOTE(daganev @ May 15 2006, 06:36 PM) 288396
Our skills don't allow it.
That's just stupid. The only thing you don't have is a rezz skill. Glomdoring's skills are fine on all other levels. And if they're not, that's something you should have taken up with your envoys, no?
Hazar2006-05-15 22:43:16
I'm actually trying to foster both. We'll see how that goes.
PS. Go Glom! Seriously, what could go wrong...I mean, it's not like we enemy people who leave.
PS. Go Glom! Seriously, what could go wrong...I mean, it's not like we enemy people who leave.