New Artifact Rune for Staves, Symbols, Athame

by Estarra

Back to Common Grounds.

Daganev2006-06-18 19:18:23
This fistsigil idea is not the same as the idea to increase parry...

Estarra was looking at mana cost recution or keeping those items always in the person's hand. Sort of like the Warrior ability of Grip.

QUOTE(Daevos @ Jun 18 2006, 11:14 AM) 299672

Non-decay and customization are fine by themselves, no further boosts are needed.


Are there any artifacts that do that?

even the cheapest jewlery rune gives +10 charges.
Unknown2006-06-18 19:18:34
QUOTE(daganev @ Jun 18 2006, 12:17 PM) 299676

This fistsigil idea is not the same as the idea to increase parry...

Estarra was looking at mana cost recution or keeping those items always in the person's hand. Sort of like the Warrior ability of Grip.


Someone suggested an increase to parry in the thread.
Daganev2006-06-18 19:19:26
yes that was me... it was quickly knocked out. (pun intended to add confusion!)

edit: Just pointing out that it was rejected immediatly and nobody is still considering that idea... was trying to clarify, incase you thought Estarra mentioning the fist sigil was the same as the idea to increase parry since both ideas came from the same post...
Unknown2006-06-18 19:20:50
QUOTE(daganev @ Jun 18 2006, 12:19 PM) 299678

yes that was me... it was quickly knocked out. (pun intended to add confusion!)


And that's the idea that I suggested was rediculous. I didn't say anything about the fist sigil thing.
Soll2006-06-18 19:22:06
Minor chance to afflict might be nice. Chills for Aquamancers, Healthleech(Maybe Epilepsy, but that's considerably stronger) for Geomancers, Maybe bleeding(as in, the one that adds 20 bleeding and stops you clotting) for Druids, as that would be a nice bonus.
Xenthos2006-06-18 19:23:41
QUOTE(Fallen @ Jun 18 2006, 03:15 PM) 299674

I agree, but if they were looking for something else, well, we might as well offer.
But the idea to increase parry is rediculous.

I feel the need to point out it's not rediculous, it's ridiculous. Since you use that a lot. sad.gif
Ashteru2006-06-18 19:27:25
QUOTE(Soll @ Jun 18 2006, 07:22 PM) 299682

Minor chance to afflict might be nice. Chills for Aquamancers, Healthleech(Maybe Epilepsy, but that's considerably stronger) for Geomancers, Maybe bleeding(as in, the one that adds 20 bleeding and stops you clotting) for Druids, as that would be a nice bonus.

Doesn't your demesne already give chills? Wouldn't that like...make it a lot better since you can be frozen then? tongue.gif
Laysus2006-06-18 19:27:46
My main concern is if it'd be something that benefitted me even though I won't be using my athame for attacking.

...kinda like the parrying idea ninja.gif

quickexit.gif
Unknown2006-06-18 19:28:33
QUOTE(Xenthos @ Jun 18 2006, 12:23 PM) 299683

I feel the need to point out it's not rediculous, it's ridiculous. Since you use that a lot. sad.gif


And I feel the need to point out that it's rediculous so long as I want it to be rediculous tongue.gif

When i'm typing on a forum, I'm writing quickly and tend to be much more phonetic, and I pronounce it rediculous, so that's how it gets put down. Deal tongue.gif
Unknown2006-06-18 19:35:07
I'm with the Daevos on this one.
Unknown2006-06-18 19:53:22
QUOTE(Estarra @ Jun 18 2006, 02:49 PM) 299643

Is lowering mana really worth it to spend more on?

I honestly don't know so I'm asking.
*shrug* I only use my athame for faeriefire, vine, nature rooting spells, and random wiccan rituals, otherwise it's Moonburst. (unless I'm stuck without drawdown during an odd part of the day)

Moonburst already costs more mana then athame(do activate and in mana consumption), but I use it for hunting/fighting because of the increased damage. If the athame's mana cost was lowered through a rune, I wouldn't feel a need to get it for that reason, I hardly ever even remember to resummon my torc if it decays on me(and the torc effects all spells mana cost). Again, just speaking for Athames, they last 5 months and take no effort to resummon, so having them resetting isn't very exiting either.

Custimization does sound sort of interesting though.
QUOTE(Ashteru @ Jun 18 2006, 02:52 PM) 299650

Well, I quited liked the Magicrown. Maybe make the rune work that perfection is % based or that it's like thrice the normal strength? (Would negate the need for manapotions for most races while bashing. <.< >.>)
Again, not appealing for wiccans with sprites and 4-5k mana.


Someone mentioned mounts, and yes, the wiccan's broom is useful for us without wings, but if there is a rune that effected it, it should be placed on the broom, not an athame.
Soll2006-06-18 19:55:10
But you wouldn't be able to place the runes on the Mage/Druid animals. tongue.gif
Unknown2006-06-18 20:08:08
QUOTE(Soll @ Jun 18 2006, 03:55 PM) 299702

But you wouldn't be able to place the runes on the Mage/Druid animals. tongue.gif
It's true, but it's also my point, I'm trying to point out the differences between staves/symbols/cudgels and the athame. Any who have trans moon/night don't use athames often; the other three are used often.
Estarra2006-06-18 20:57:39
We could have Moonburst and Nightkiss need an athame to use.

(I suspect warriors don't use those spells as they get the weapon boosts.)
Unknown2006-06-18 21:01:10
QUOTE(Estarra @ Jun 18 2006, 01:57 PM) 299716

We could have Moonburst and Nightkiss need an athame to use.

(I suspect warriors don't use those spells as they get the weapon boosts.)


Actually, that's not true.

My Moon/Night warriors have used it. And I know others do as well, or at least they used to.
Unknown2006-06-18 21:01:26
I've known several warriors who use them to bash. It's a godsend for the rare mugwump warrior. Anyway, I'm still all for the 'no decay/resets/customizable' set-up, with no frills. You'll sell plenty of them with that alone.
Xenthos2006-06-18 21:01:39
QUOTE(Estarra @ Jun 18 2006, 04:57 PM) 299716

We could have Moonburst and Nightkiss need an athame to use.

(I suspect warriors don't use those spells as they get the weapon boosts.)

Nightkiss / moonburst are often better for warrior bashing and hunting. Diamante used it all the time, especially with the +magic damage artifact.
Unknown2006-06-18 21:04:44
Also, out of curiosity - do +magic damage runes affect the damage done by warriors who have magical damage great runes on their weapons?
Laysus2006-06-18 21:17:53
QUOTE(Temporary_Guido @ Jun 18 2006, 10:01 PM) 299719

I've known several warriors who use them to bash. It's a godsend for the rare mugwump warrior. Anyway, I'm still all for the 'no decay/resets/customizable' set-up, with no frills. You'll sell plenty of them with that alone.


I find myself worrying that I'm agreeing with Guido.
Sylphas2006-06-18 21:24:04
I'd actually love if Moonburst used my athame. Just make it so that Wiccans require it, and Warriors can use one of their weapons for it.

And I agree with the no-frills straight customization. Not sure if I'd use it, but it's a nice option to have, even without any combat benefit. (I'm still secretly pining for a custom witch's hat I can stick things in, if I customize anything.)