Jack2006-07-03 02:28:43
QUOTE(Quidgyboo @ Jul 3 2006, 03:18 AM) 304470
So you're for the prohibition of any type of implement that could be used to cause harm then, I hope?
I'm against miniature bear-traps that can be hidden within vaginas much the same way I am opposed to concealed weapons, yes.
Xavius2006-07-03 02:33:42
QUOTE(Jack @ Jul 2 2006, 09:28 PM) 304473
I'm against miniature bear-traps that can be hidden within vaginas much the same way I am opposed to concealed weapons, yes.
It's not a bear trap. It's two dozen fish hooks designed to let you slide right in, then imbed in your skin like a porcupine needle when you try to pull out...except you can't push them all the way through. Nor would you. Ow.
Daganev2006-07-03 03:05:11
I suspect the mere existance of those things would be a deterant, let alone if anyone actually uses them.
If the press was nice to women, they would report that 10 million units have allready been sold
Oh, and they would report that you can't tell if its there or not.
In southafrica, a lot of rape happens because of a desire to create children as a sign of pride, or something along those lines.. its pretty nasty. There is also a belief that the only way to cure AIDS is to have sex with a virgin without a condom... who the hell spread THAT rumor?
If the press was nice to women, they would report that 10 million units have allready been sold
Oh, and they would report that you can't tell if its there or not.
In southafrica, a lot of rape happens because of a desire to create children as a sign of pride, or something along those lines.. its pretty nasty. There is also a belief that the only way to cure AIDS is to have sex with a virgin without a condom... who the hell spread THAT rumor?
Sylphas2006-07-03 05:55:19
QUOTE(Veonira @ Jul 2 2006, 10:12 PM) 304468
The people on death row actually take MORE money than the people in jail for life. Criminals on death row are constantly in court trying to reduce their sentence from death to jail for life and stuff, which ends up costing more than simply feeding someone and keeping them locked up.
They cost us nothing after they're dead. Don't have them sit on death row for years. Take them out behind the courthouse and hang them.
I guarentee you it it's a better deterrant if you know for a fact that you will be immediately destroyed if you are convicted and sentenced to death, than if you think you have years to wait and appeal.
Verithrax2006-07-03 08:32:53
QUOTE(Fallen @ Jul 2 2006, 05:49 PM) 304414
Except that castration does nothing to stop the desire to rape. Rape isn't about sex, its about control.
You'd know?
QUOTE(Nurglokh @ Jul 2 2006, 11:23 PM) 304471
Rape Deterrant: Dentata, via the novel Snowcrash. A hypodermic needle filled with a quick-acting sedative.
As far as prosecution, personally I think chemical castration is a good thing, alongside forced tracking and social restraints.
Maybe tattooing the offending perpetratior with a big 'R' would be useful. He's rated R, under 18 not allowed.
How very... medieval.
Esano2006-07-03 08:41:36
What happens when the man's erection subsides?
And, of course, this would simple mean that rapists would obey the following rule:
Finger before you .
And, of course, this would simple mean that rapists would obey the following rule:
Finger before you .
Unknown2006-07-03 10:55:48
QUOTE
“If a victim is wearing such a device it may enrage the attacker further and possibly result in more harm being caused,†said Sam Waterhouse, advocacy coordinator for Rape Crisis.
Look, my dick has bloody holes in it, I think it's these dozens of hooks sticking into it, hrm, hospital before I pass out...? nope more rage against the victim!
Sam Waterhouse doesn't know what he/she is talking about.
Sylphas2006-07-03 12:05:03
QUOTE(Wesmin @ Jul 3 2006, 06:55 AM) 304568
Look, my dick has bloody holes in it, I think it's these dozens of hooks sticking into it, hrm, hospital before I pass out...? nope more rage against the victim!
Sam Waterhouse doesn't know what he/she is talking about.
Doesn't take very long to shoot/stab someone to death.
Veonira2006-07-03 13:23:06
QUOTE(Sylphas @ Jul 3 2006, 01:55 AM) 304556
They cost us nothing after they're dead. Don't have them sit on death row for years. Take them out behind the courthouse and hang them.
I guarentee you it it's a better deterrant if you know for a fact that you will be immediately destroyed if you are convicted and sentenced to death, than if you think you have years to wait and appeal.
Yeah, in the perfect world that would work out nicely.
Problem is, you don't want to kill someone who is innocent, which is why a lot of these convicts sit on death row for so long. And then you have plea bargains, so occasionally even if someone -does- confess, their sentence is brought down from death to several life sentences or something.
Iridiel2006-07-03 14:06:59
And you don't want a criminal thinking: "they're going to kill me if they catch me, so I better kill the victim so there's less chances that she gets the cops on me. After all, if they catch me it'll be the same thing, so I have nothing to lose"
Unknown2006-07-03 14:42:52
QUOTE(Fallen @ Jul 2 2006, 07:34 PM) 304442
Nope. Rapists will just use objects instead. If anything, it makes it worse, because then you've got added frustration driving the rapist, and I'm betting that the other things usable are going to be a whole lot more traumatic.
Well that's just icky.