Ok still sick but this game is dying. Speak up people.

I'm going to FOS Dag, for all the good it does, as I don't like how he's shifting blame around either.

Also, where is everyone else? arrgh

Still here, just don't have a lot to say since I already voted against Verithrax. Let me check back a couple pages to see if he responded when I'm done hunting Water.

I sill have no 'good' reason to vote without being random. According to Daganev anyways.

Shall we start voting and chasing the people who are inactive/lurking in the shadows? They aren't helping us a bit with that attitude!

Woops, forgot to respond after I was done hunting water. Nobody is surprised.
Anyways.



You don't have to choose between "taking a gamble" and "being a sheep". You can just act reasonable about it rather than being random, since you're apparently not necessarily "about" randomness.

Uh, Quid I voted for you. Aren't you going to retaliate?

I pretty much cant make a move without 'being a sheep,' I cant take a chance with a vote because I 'dont have a good reason' and I can seem 'random' so please excuse me for not knowing what to do and its going to turn out that Im going to -have- to make a random vote because I cant -find- anyone I -think- is scummy enough for a vote because Im accused of being -random-. I have to take a vote because Im leaving on my trip in two days.

I'm in my "vindictive bitch" mood at the moment (with mood swings scheduled for every hour and a half), so I can't really say anything clearly or coherently, or play this game properly at all. I'll say thar Verithrax is likely innocent. Daganev definitely is. Take those for what you will.

I'm going with my gut and not thinking too hard about it. Vote Forren.

I personally think Daganev is scummy, so prove otherwise if you want the vote off. Your actions have bugged me in this so Im sticking with it. Bother me, Ill release the frustrations of a week long headache on you.

Vote: Daganev

Ok, here is what I know/think.


Players:
1) Forren - innocent, know this for a fact
2) Shiri - innocent, also know for a fact
3) Iridiel - Looks scummy to me by process of elimination
4) Diamondais - I don't know what to think, VERY strange roleclaim.
5) Quidgyboo - Looks scummy to me by process of elimination
6) Daganev - Inoccent, Know for a fact.
7) Tsaephai - Looks scummy to me by process of elimiation
8) Brad - DEAD
9) Verithrax - Is looking to be innocent
10) Shorlen - Would not have vouched for me, if scummy.
11) Archer2 - If scummy would have bandwagoned on Verithrax instead of point to quid.

So, I'm going to unvote verithrax and vote quid Although, if nobody else thinks that Quid is scummy, perhaps we should get Tsaephai, since he seems to be very inactive. But Tsaephai could just be a vigilante, since with 0 night kills, I would think that the scum are wanted to get killing done during the day.

DOUBLEPOST

Let me change something in my post. Where is says "Innocent" change that to "Not a charachter that has the role of killing people during the night", who knows if say, DIamondais wins if she happens to get 3 gambles correct in a row, and everybody else loses.

Such a wierd roleclaim....

I'm not convinced Verithrax is innocent. Pfeh. Diamondais is also weird, but I get this feeling like it's less that she's scummy so much as, uhm, inexperienced.

What the heck are you on Daganev? Theres no such thing. I dont 'win' if I win three gambles. I told you -everything- I can about me, which is -everything- I know about myself. If you have problems with my role take it up with Requiem because I know nothing more about my role. My gambles are what -might- happen during the night, what someone might do, who might die. I lost my first bet, I havent gotten another since. So I cant 'win' by what you say. So leave off.

Shorlen could be scummy and still vouch for you so she looks un-scummy. And knowing for a fact means you have proof of it or just that you're very sure of it ?

And what do you know, someones finally noticed Im new to the game. Ive only said it a few times. I have no idea what Im doing, so Im working with things. I dont know every single aspect of the game unlike the more experienced players. If I try something its automatically pushed that Im doing things wrong? So what can I do? Really, come on. I cant grab 'good reasoning' like some of you, if I go with what I feel its acting random so Im left with nothing. I didnt choose my role and everyone thinks my role claim is weird, what else can I do about it?

It was a made up example that I pulled out of my arse. Relax.

For all I know there is NO scum. Do we have any evidence that scum exist?



Scum = People who know eachother, talk at night, and kill people.




She could, but the facts and voting pattern say otherwise.

I haven't voted so far because nobody has betrayed himself or appeared to be very scummy. Shiri is the closest to scum around as far as I can see, and he's probably just suspicious anyway. But, just to stir things up a little, and as he was trying to push Shiri into retaliating Quid's vote, Vote: Archer2.

Out of curiosity, because I want to understand, why do you think Archer2 would vote for quid instead of you if he was scummy?

Could be a cover-up. He seems a little too eager to get rid of Quid, specially considering Quid hasn't shown signs of being scummy and Archer is keeping too quiet.

Archer2 seems to be almost certainly non-scummy to me, I can't get what you're poking at.
I don't see how anyone could think that Verithrax is non-scummy, so Daganev seems a bit suspicious to me because he supports Verithrax, yet if it weren't for that I'd say Daganev would be acting his ussual self, so I'm undecided about him. Shiri seems good, although there's not much information on him, and I think that Diamondais is a neutral role that wins on their own as Daganev had suggested, but that's not nearly as dangerous as the scum that work together, and that Diamondais doesn't seem to know what they're doing themselves, so it's hard to tell if they're believable.
Shorlen seems a bit scummy, but I only base that on two things, so that's probably rather unreliable.
Daganev's post confuses me, he has half the people I think are scummy on one side and the other half on the other, and vice versa...The main thing is that he says that he knows for a truth that Forren and Shiri are non-scummy, but I'd say that Daganev most likely is, Shiri most likely isn't, and Forren is on the border.

I hold to my vote against Verithrax.

You know, if you dont believe me at all come say it first. Im telling the truth..and please I still am a girl and always have been.