Shiri2006-07-28 15:25:40
QUOTE(daganev @ Jul 28 2006, 03:29 PM) 312377
Preventive regulations are always stupid. That is, regulations that are created because people think something might go wrong but have no proof of anything wrong actually happening.
Could you back that up please? (With something other than analogy.)
Unknown2006-07-28 15:57:07
I understand what you're saying, but there is a difference between pre-emptive retribution (arresting someone based on the possibility that they might do something) and pre-emptive legislation (saying that it's illegal to kill someone before a murder has actually been committed).
Plus you have the problem of inertia. If we spend a couple years not regulating the internet, the companies that would be affected will cry even more loudly if the decision is reversed in the future.
Plus you have the problem of inertia. If we spend a couple years not regulating the internet, the companies that would be affected will cry even more loudly if the decision is reversed in the future.
Daganev2006-07-28 17:02:20
QUOTE(Shiri @ Jul 28 2006, 08:25 AM) 312408
Could you back that up please? (With something other than analogy.)
Outside of the military, governements to not inspire innovation. Regulations tend to favour the status quo.
The law of unintended consequences tends to go against the public's interests, not towards it.
Outlawing murder, is very different than outlawing the possiblity of murder. For example, nobody can own anything that might be used to kill a person.
Regulations don't outlaw thigns, they outlaw the possibilities. In this case, the suggested regulation is not saying you can't squash internet content. The Law is saying that you can't charge different groups different amounts for different services.
Verithrax2006-07-28 19:45:34
You sound a lot like Stephen Colbert sometimes, Daganev.
"Our energy and emphasis are directed against illegal weapons, not legal ones."
-UN Website
Colbert: THEY'RE TRYING TO TAKE ALWAY OUR GUNS!
"Our energy and emphasis are directed against illegal weapons, not legal ones."
-UN Website
Colbert: THEY'RE TRYING TO TAKE ALWAY OUR GUNS!
Daganev2006-07-28 20:47:07
QUOTE(Verithrax @ Jul 28 2006, 12:45 PM) 312455
You sound a lot like Stephen Colbert sometimes, Daganev.
"Our energy and emphasis are directed against illegal weapons, not legal ones."
-UN Website
Colbert: THEY'RE TRYING TO TAKE ALWAY OUR GUNS!
He does inspire me.