You are right Mirk, I probably will end up voting for you. Not least amongst the reasons is that you keep on misrepresenting me. I said that I only voted when I wanted to put pressure on someone or lynch them - not that I would vote at the whim of people who thought I didn't vote enough.

Ytraelux is also a contender for me though, his "you will probably get lynched no matter what you claim your role as" annoys me, especially since the mass unvoting for Dia as soon as she claimed and Requiem revealed his gambit (which to be honest, is a moderately common one that power players pull out on occasion). There is also the lack of me voting for Requiem, who if I didn't believe Daganev implicitly would easily have been one of the prime lynch candidates for the start of the day (Daganev was in my opinion a far more viable target just on the end of Day 1 and the lack of people jumping on that wagon disturbed me greatly).

EBWOP: As an addendum to the first paragraph "That isn't being indecisive, it is being careful about who I am aiming up to watch swing".

I don't believe that I'm misrepresenting you, I've only been saying what my interpretation of your actions are. I could very well be misinterpreting what your actions have been so far, but then again, I may not.

I just find the circumstances surrounding your vote suspicious. You said you didn't feel like voting because you couldn't tell who was scummier. Two people criticize lack of voting and some other posts are made, but none deal with Verithrax or anything that might convince me that Verithrax, or anyone for that matter, was scum. You then vote for Verithrax.

From what I saw, I could only think of two scenarios that would have triggered your vote:
1) You voted because of the two people criticizing not voting
or
2) You had gotten behind on reading the posts in this thread, and just wanted to post to affirm that you were still playing and defend you lack of voting, and then finished reading the rest of the posts leading to your decision to vote for Verithrax.

Scenario 2 didn't seem very likely to me, given you seem to be on top of things in this thread.

Side note:

in·de·ci·sive /ˌɪndɪˈsaɪsɪv/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. characterized by indecision, as persons; irresolute; undecided.
2. not decisive or conclusive: a severe but indecisive battle.
3. lacking definition; vague or indistinct: the indecisive outline of the distant hills.

Orrrr, perhaps it was Verithrax's own post in that time period that convinced him.


As he wrote in his post, he did not like Verithrax's vote based on trying to dissasociate with me.

You people are so boring.

I'm going to remove my vote from mirk unvote mirk because nobody seems to be defending him. At this point in the argument, if I was scummy and he was scummy I would atleast make a comment about his innocence.

Any suggestions on who might actually be dangerous?

I'm still concerned about Diamondas trying to save linwe but linwe dieing anyways. I remember I once thought I was a protector and I ended up being an insane killer.

I do apologize for my not posting as much anymore. Back in school now, fully, so that's grabbing a lot of my attention. Lots to catch up on, but I'm almost done.

And Daganev, insanity really isn't something someone can tell by themselves. I don't think I am, and what I've said is what I know.

That is true, but if someone is insane, that means there is a psychiatrist about who could help us.

Just thought of something crazy...

What if the game was only won once there was a vote for no lynch ... don't think that would make sense though.

Yes, that is true. One can hope they can come out and say what's up and tell whether I'm really innocent or not (since suspicion is seemingly there still) or it may be best for them to remain quiet so that those who don't mind having someone like me (IF I am insane) can do so without drawing any notice to them.

Meaning no actual mafia, just a boatload of paranoia and confusion?
Sounds possible, just not very probable.
I doubt Quidgy would do something like that.

I actually wouldn't put it past Quidgy at all. Although it sounds more like something I would do.

I'M THE PSYCHIATRIST< PHEAR ME!! DIA IS SCUM LOL KEELZ IT@

Just kidding. I think.

So very mean.

However, another role change.. I wouldn't put it past you.

At some point I'm going to come out and claim to be the UBER CHAINLINGK of D()()M and the game is over when I say "I win."

Mod Note: I'm still around just very busy with my new job. I think there are prods to be sent but for the next day or so I don't have time to count posts back. Soon, my kittens, soon.

Okay, I'm back in the UK, so I should me more active in the game now.

However, we don't really seem to be going anywhere... And I have no idea how to get us somewhere. Damn. Someone do something controversial!

I'm here, I'm playing, and I'm mighty confused.

Here is my current list of thoughts on people. Perhaps we can compare thoughts and find a consensus. Sort of a list of compare everyone's thoughts on who they think is scummy, and if enough of us all think the same person is scummy, then we can pick them.

2. Okin - Might be scummy
3. Diamondais - might be harmfull but definitly not mafia
4. Asarnil - not mafia
5. Daganev - not mafia
6. Saran - not mafia
7. Othero - might be scummy
8. Mirk - seems scummy, but probabbly not
9. Ytraelux - might be scummy
10 Requiem dot exe - not mafia
12. Iridiel - might be scummy.

Just asking for a noobish clarification. Does the term "scummy" usually refer to everyone who doesn't win with the town, or just Mafia?

I think different people use the term differently.

But it normally include non mafia cults, but doesn't always include serial killers.