Ashteru2007-10-16 21:18:03
QUOTE(Catarin @ Oct 16 2007, 09:15 PM) 450500
It's unfortunate that people are focusing on lich but the intent had little to do with lich itself. Lich is the least problematic of the skills that are the problem.
Oh, I was just commenting on Forren insulting Ild because he was talking about Lich. If you just skim over the topic, you probably get the impression it is mostly about Lich, since first it was used for the initial argument, and then continued for several examples.
Ildaudid2007-10-16 21:18:17
QUOTE(Ashteru @ Oct 16 2007, 05:13 PM) 450496
However, you do have to agree, the main focus of this topic seemed to be about Lich, not transmigrate, so no need to insult him like that right now.
Yea what the said!!!! It seems to be whining about lich, if they do what the says, no reason to whine. I am holding back from verbal assault since the asked me to. So I will leave it at that.
Oh yeah = Ashypoo
Catarin2007-10-16 21:19:02
QUOTE(Ashteru @ Oct 16 2007, 03:18 PM) 450505
Oh, I was just commenting on Forren insulting Ild because he was talking about Lich. If you just skim over the topic, you probably get the impression it is mostly about Lich, since first it was used for the initial argument, and then continued for several examples.
Right I can see that. Well, it was the only proven one which is why I used it in the opening post. Still. Off track!
Can we just fix it back please?
Forren2007-10-16 21:19:50
QUOTE(Catarin @ Oct 16 2007, 05:19 PM) 450507
Right I can see that. Well, it was the only proven one which is why I used it in the opening post. Still. Off track!
Can we just fix it back please?
Can we just fix it back please?
/agree
No essence reduction for these skills please.
Ashteru2007-10-16 21:20:12
QUOTE(Forren @ Oct 16 2007, 09:16 PM) 450502
"Lich" is easier to type than "Transmigrate/Lich/Darkrebirth/etc". I also see Lich more than the other two. My whine is that no skill should make someone immune to essence loss as a Demigod, not about lich in particular. Ildaudid just likes to make personal attacks when he can that make no sense in context.
Oh, I know you were talking about the other skills too, but you made the impression of attacking Ild because he was talking about it in correlation with Lich. Assuming he just skimmed over the posts, I can understand if he was thinking this thread was just about Phoenix and Lich, not about all others as well.
Veonira2007-10-16 21:20:15
QUOTE(Ildaudid @ Oct 16 2007, 05:00 PM) 450480
Boo hoo, Magnagora can lich, well who the hell cares, its not like all demis in Mag are Avatars, like Celest has (
Shamarah2007-10-16 21:22:29
Who cares, it's not like you can lose demigod anyway unless you're actively trying to do so.
Morgfyre2007-10-16 21:23:06
QUOTE(Forren @ Oct 16 2007, 02:01 PM) 450481
Even Magnagorans who can lich are saying this is uncalled for.
All of them? Which percent? Are there polling errors? Can even a single objection be overriden by the will of the majority? What percent of the minority do we need to override their concern? Consensus? 90%? 50%? 25%? 5%?
Without getting any more ridiculous I think you can see why Lusternia's development isn't determined by consensus or polling (though there have been MUDs which have tried this in the past, and subsequently the players voted to forego that system in favor of administrative-led development after it failed).
QUOTE(Catarin @ Oct 16 2007, 02:02 PM) 450482
Okay, will the administration consider changing this back? It really makes no...sense. While it is great the administration doesn't want people to lose any utility from their skills due to becoming a demigod, this seems the very wrong way to go about it and perhaps other avenues could be explored that do not have such an impact?
We are always open to considering other alternatives, but it seems a bit silly to me that certain skills (transmigrate, etc.) would have targetted exceptions that they do not function for Demigods. What other avenues should we explore?
We saw a lot of concern by Demigods when phoenix costs were greater that the limiting factor on their power (threat of losing Demigod) wasn't an interesting or enjoyable mechanic. Also, when initially Demigod powers were restricted (a timer on ascension to the havens), there were numerous cries (by many of the same people who are now posting in this thread, notably Forren and Aesyra) that limiting Demigod powers made it worthless to be a Demigod and that they were going to quit the game because they had been so nerfed. I'm skeptical that anything has changed since then that would make it otherwise. What should be the counterbalance to Demigod powers?
Forren2007-10-16 21:23:14
QUOTE(Shamarah @ Oct 16 2007, 05:22 PM) 450512
Who cares, it's not like you can lose demigod anyway unless you're actively trying to do so.
Thoros had 12k essence and died. He liched.
Ildaudid2007-10-16 21:23:45
Yea gods can have multiple, and I can guarantee anyone reaching demi in celest will end up an avatar. I think there should only be one too. But yea I agree with you and Ashy on essence.
Ashteru2007-10-16 21:24:03
Soo, rite, Admins are aware of the problem, so either this thread should be closed to avoid further arguing and stuff, or made into a poll to back the proposals up with raw numbers.
EDIT: Lol, seems Morgy owned my idea even before I finished posting. <.<
EDIT: Lol, seems Morgy owned my idea even before I finished posting. <.<
Catarin2007-10-16 21:24:24
QUOTE(Veonira @ Oct 16 2007, 03:20 PM) 450510
Well there's one thing I managed to glean out in here that I'm confused about. I don't see how it makes sense for a divine to have multiple avatars. I only see that two people are Avatars of Terentia, but I was always under the impression that there was -one- Avatar. The honors line even says "S/he is the Avatar..."
/derail
I agree essence lost should be added back in, but nothing else changed.
/derail
I agree essence lost should be added back in, but nothing else changed.
We have two gods with two avatars a piece and really, no mechanical reason more can't be made. Soon we'll see stacked exalt wraths wiping out whole groups of people! Good times, good times. (btw, this is sarcasm and I think it should be addressed before it's a problem though not in this thread. Get your own thread Veo!)
Ildaudid2007-10-16 21:26:02
QUOTE(Morgfyre @ Oct 16 2007, 05:23 PM) 450514
Also, when initially Demigod powers were restricted (a timer on ascension to the havens), there were numerous cries (by many of the same people who are now posting in this thread, notably Forren and Aesyra) that limiting Demigod powers made it worthless to be a Demigod and that they were going to quit the game because they had been so nerfed. I'm skeptical that anything has changed since then that would make it otherwise. What should be the counterbalance to Demigod powers?
Hehe, yeah I remember that. I am not sure what the counterbalance should be though.
Forren2007-10-16 21:26:35
QUOTE(Morgfyre @ Oct 16 2007, 05:23 PM) 450514
All of them? Which percent? Are there polling errors? Can even a single objection be overriden by the will of the majority? What percent of the minority do we need to override their concern? Consensus? 90%? 50%? 25%? 5%?
I don't believe I saw anyone in this thread, some of whom are demigods, argue that it should stay the way it currently is. I'm just not sure why it was changed from the status quo - whose will demanded that to be changed? What minority, if not the majority?
QUOTE(Morgfyre @ Oct 16 2007, 05:23 PM) 450514
We saw a lot of concern by Demigods when phoenix costs were greater that the limiting factor on their power (threat of losing Demigod) wasn't an interesting or enjoyable mechanic. Also, when initially Demigod powers were restricted (a timer on ascension to the havens), there were numerous cries (by many of the same people who are now posting in this thread, notably Forren and Aesyra) that limiting Demigod powers made it worthless to be a Demigod and that they were going to quit the game because they had been so nerfed. I'm skeptical that anything has changed since then that would make it otherwise. What should be the counterbalance to Demigod powers?
We just found it rather silly that Haven was nerfed for no particular reason, out of the blue. It didn't make it worthless, it made the skill worthless. It's a lot better than the initial change now, though, and I do like the inclusion of Zap.
My main objection to the current situation is that it's possible now for people to never lose essence. Ever. See: trans ecologist demigod.
Acrune2007-10-16 21:27:05
Here I was, all depressed and reading this thread. After all, no one was making moronic and blindly biased posts, and what fun is that?
And then, Ildaudid posted. Thanks Ildaudid, you always come through for us when we need our daily dose of posts positively dripping with bias.
So this post has a point:
I agree. The change was unwanted, unneeded, and detrimental to the game, and I don't really hearing anyone disagreeing.
And then, Ildaudid posted. Thanks Ildaudid, you always come through for us when we need our daily dose of posts positively dripping with bias.
So this post has a point:
QUOTE("Catarin")
Can we just fix it back please?
I agree. The change was unwanted, unneeded, and detrimental to the game, and I don't really hearing anyone disagreeing.
Shamarah2007-10-16 21:27:54
QUOTE(Forren @ Oct 16 2007, 05:23 PM) 450515
Thoros had 12k essence and died. He liched.
Ok, well, he's just retarded then
Malicia2007-10-16 21:28:03
I think what annoyed them most was the change to haven, or am I mistaken? I'm sure they could clear that up.
Ildaudid2007-10-16 21:28:34
QUOTE(Acrune @ Oct 16 2007, 05:27 PM) 450522
Here I was, all depressed and reading this thread. After all, no one was making moronic and blindly biased posts, and what fun is that?
And then, Ildaudid posted. Thanks Ildaudid, you always come through for us when we need our daily dose of posts positively dripping with bias.
So this post has a point:
I agree. The change was unwanted, unneeded, and detrimental to the game, and I don't really hearing anyone disagreeing.
And then, Ildaudid posted. Thanks Ildaudid, you always come through for us when we need our daily dose of posts positively dripping with bias.
So this post has a point:
I agree. The change was unwanted, unneeded, and detrimental to the game, and I don't really hearing anyone disagreeing.
Yay, I am glad I cheered you up my brother!!!!
edit- Veo yer sig is going crazy!!!
Forren2007-10-16 21:30:10
QUOTE(Malicia @ Oct 16 2007, 05:28 PM) 450524
I think what annoyed them most was the change to haven, or am I mistaken? I'm sure they could clear that up.
Correct. It took me 18 seconds to ascend. Can you say "useless skill"?
With the change to manses and the change to the ascend time, it's much more useful. I like Seek.
Catarin2007-10-16 21:30:17
QUOTE(Morgfyre @ Oct 16 2007, 03:23 PM) 450514
All of them? Which percent? Are there polling errors? Can even a single objection be overriden by the will of the majority? What percent of the minority do we need to override their concern? Consensus? 90%? 50%? 25%? 5%?
Without getting any more ridiculous I think you can see why Lusternia's development isn't determined by consensus or polling (though there have been MUDs which have tried this in the past, and subsequently the players voted to forego that system in favor of administrative-led development after it failed).
We are always open to considering other alternatives, but it seems a bit silly to me that certain skills (transmigrate, etc.) would have targetted exceptions that they do not function for Demigods. What other avenues should we explore?
We saw a lot of concern by Demigods when phoenix costs were greater that the limiting factor on their power (threat of losing Demigod) wasn't an interesting or enjoyable mechanic. Also, when initially Demigod powers were restricted (a timer on ascension to the havens), there were numerous cries (by many of the same people who are now posting in this thread, notably Forren and Aesyra) that limiting Demigod powers made it worthless to be a Demigod and that they were going to quit the game because they had been so nerfed. I'm skeptical that anything has changed since then that would make it otherwise. What should be the counterbalance to Demigod powers?
Without getting any more ridiculous I think you can see why Lusternia's development isn't determined by consensus or polling (though there have been MUDs which have tried this in the past, and subsequently the players voted to forego that system in favor of administrative-led development after it failed).
We are always open to considering other alternatives, but it seems a bit silly to me that certain skills (transmigrate, etc.) would have targetted exceptions that they do not function for Demigods. What other avenues should we explore?
We saw a lot of concern by Demigods when phoenix costs were greater that the limiting factor on their power (threat of losing Demigod) wasn't an interesting or enjoyable mechanic. Also, when initially Demigod powers were restricted (a timer on ascension to the havens), there were numerous cries (by many of the same people who are now posting in this thread, notably Forren and Aesyra) that limiting Demigod powers made it worthless to be a Demigod and that they were going to quit the game because they had been so nerfed. I'm skeptical that anything has changed since then that would make it otherwise. What should be the counterbalance to Demigod powers?
Other avenues as in make it so that there are still benefits to the abilities even though the essence loss remains. I am not really understanding your arguments here. You are saying the majority will of players in a game should not override the minorities concerns? We are not talking about civil rights here. We're talking about a few unbalanced skills. And you are completely ignoring that these are not just trans skills we are talking about. In the case of lich every single Magnagoran has access to it. Same with dark rebirth. With transmigrate you are basically saying that no demigod that has transmigrate will EVER lose essence for dying because it is basically phoenix without the essence cost. I honestly do not see how these things are justified? The arguments being made do not make any sense....
But let's discuss other avenues if that is what it takes to get what is clearly a terrible imbalance fixed. In terms of lich it could just be made that when you die with lich up, you phoenix as normal but do not lose lich. That's pretty beneficial! Better than the original skill given how much people say that running around as a soul is no guarantee of safety. Popping up in havens is pretty darn safe.
Anyone have suggestions for transmigrate and dark rebirth? I'm not familiar enough with how they work.
Edit: And quite frankly it is a bit frustrating to be told here that the majority will just isn't all that big of a concern in terms of balance issues. Truehealing was taken away from all of one org quickly enough when the majority spoke up even with a pretty sizeable minority against it. And it WAS imbalanced. And THIS is imbalanced. The concern for wanting people to keep the utility of their skills when becoming demigod in no way shape or form justifies an action this extreme.