It being Malarious, take one guess. One.

He wants Nihilists to have Trueheal?

<3 Malarious

You're making yourself look rather silly. He doesn't HAVE trueheal so could not use it so what's the relevance? That even though he doesn't have trueheal if, hypothetically, he did have trueheal he could escape being ganked if he's quick enough to push refresh power, starchant trueheal? And that's insane because..? They get away from the gank without losing their defenses? It still costs 10,000 essence which is more than say if he happened to be Magnagoran when he died he would have lost no essence at all. Or if he was from the Glomdoring, he'd have an egg! If he had transmigrate, well... you get the idea. Oh, if he had low magic he could have refreshed power and used serpent and then escaped. That all has just about as much relevance.

Kind of like if he had Lich he would have not lost any essence?

Too bad he's Celestian where pretty much none of that applies?

Wish Serens were any better.

I actually thought you of all people would notice a Narsrim poke.

For those who have been away.. Narsrim trueheals to run even if he is raiding

and <3 u 2 Bianca


Btw Nihilists with Truheal.. too shiny... gimme anti trueheal!

Costs 10 power, gives all afflictions, takes health, mana and ego to negative 10%, and knocks off balance/eq?

I don't know, seems like Nihilists would still be too aeon-reliant.

You win.

The thread can now be closed, there is nothing more to say.

I miss Lich. You can do whatever the hell you feel like without any fear of real death or essence loss

Hahaha

OMG YES. We have our Iwin button to with the rest of you classes.

Aeon would suck.. so lets just walk Nihilists in as a group and antitrueheal all the other group

Wouldn't antitrueheal be... falseheal?

Nope, that in reality antitrueheal would be trueafflict. Or truedead to make it sound cooler...

Or falseafflict.

Seriously... I mean seriously now. How can you call a skill that gives you all afflictions "falseafflict"? Makes no sense, does it? Does it?
Thought so!

true and heal...

opposite of true is alse
opposite of heal is afflict

opposite of trueheal is therefore falseafflict

Uh, no?

-( a * b ) = ( -a ) * b = a * ( -b )

So trueafflict or falseheal. I thought it was pretty clear.

Falseafflict would give your opponent uncurable hypochondria that would be able to fake any affliction in the game and that would make diagnose randomly give false results.

Restores health and mana and gives extra 10%, cures all afflictions - TrueHeal as in heals you completely
Takes all health and mana and takes extra 10%, gives all afflictions - TrueAfflict/TrueDead as in you up completely

The effects of the ability is what matters in this case. How can you call an ability that gives you all afflictions as FalseAfflict?


EDIT:
And it can't be FalseHeal either... unless you make that ability cost 10p and do nothing. Giving afflictions is not healing. It's simple logics really...

I'd call it semantics, not logic.