Casilu2008-06-25 02:30:49
Or it could be that "Celestine Serial Killer" we were warned about.
Unknown2008-06-25 02:31:20
QUOTE(Revan @ Jun 24 2008, 07:18 PM) 525645
Damn, now you made it a hard choice between you and Visaeris. Vis because his claims of me being "lurky" are really flims. So what? Why do I have to b a shiribot and post every single minute of the day? I -did- post yesterday. count up the total people who are posting, versus the people who haven't made a single post.
Arix, you're very unsure of your decisions and seem to just be jumping on people "just because". Can you give me a better reason for why you want to vote for me?
Arix, you're very unsure of your decisions and seem to just be jumping on people "just because". Can you give me a better reason for why you want to vote for me?
If you would like to post an alternative, I'm open to it.
Rika2008-06-25 02:37:13
QUOTE(casilu @ Jun 25 2008, 02:30 PM) 525651
Or it could be that "Celestine Serial Killer" we were warned about.
What Celestine Serial Killer?
Thul2008-06-25 02:40:43
Huh. And here I was expecting to not see day 2. What do you know.
The "judged and found wanting" death is inquisition. I'm guessing it's a pro-town Celestine vigilante who chose not to kill night one for lack of information. Although... was Xavius doing anything suspicious at all? If the target was randomly selected, we could be looking at SK number 2. Which'd strikes me as odd, but I'd expect about anything from this game.
That said, let's light a fire under Kaervas. Where aaaaaare you...
Vote: Kaervas
The "judged and found wanting" death is inquisition. I'm guessing it's a pro-town Celestine vigilante who chose not to kill night one for lack of information. Although... was Xavius doing anything suspicious at all? If the target was randomly selected, we could be looking at SK number 2. Which'd strikes me as odd, but I'd expect about anything from this game.
That said, let's light a fire under Kaervas. Where aaaaaare you...
Vote: Kaervas
Casilu2008-06-25 02:46:23
QUOTE(Thul @ Jun 22 2008, 10:15 AM) 524478
I'm here and I've been waiting for the game to start, too. Vote: B_a_L_i for consistently picking on the new kids.
Enfranchising angels? That is a bit ambiguous... it's either going to empower or neuter a Celestian or two. I'm going to work with the "Neuter a Celestine" interpretation at the moment, and lean towards voting Yea, on the hypothesis that there's a certain named Celestine serial killer out there.
I'll hold off for the moment though... I know near nothing about the other realms. Can anyone tell us if any of them use angels as well?
Enfranchising angels? That is a bit ambiguous... it's either going to empower or neuter a Celestian or two. I'm going to work with the "Neuter a Celestine" interpretation at the moment, and lean towards voting Yea, on the hypothesis that there's a certain named Celestine serial killer out there.
I'll hold off for the moment though... I know near nothing about the other realms. Can anyone tell us if any of them use angels as well?
That was what I was talking about. So, it's either serial killer Celestine or Vig.
Also, speak Tenebrous Wrath!
Vote: Kaervas
Casilu2008-06-25 02:46:58
QUOTE(Thul @ Jun 24 2008, 07:40 PM) 525657
Huh. And here I was expecting to not see day 2. What do you know.
The "judged and found wanting" death is inquisition.
Vote: Kaervas
The "judged and found wanting" death is inquisition.
Vote: Kaervas
Also, it's not inquisition, it's judgement.
Furien2008-06-25 02:47:42
QUOTE(casilu @ Jun 24 2008, 07:46 PM) 525659
That was what I was talking about. So, it's either serial killer Celestine or Vig.
Also, speak Tenebrous Wrath!
Vote: Kaervas
Also, speak Tenebrous Wrath!
Vote: Kaervas
Enfranchising the angels would have given them a vote, not granted Celestines an SK/Vig power. ><
Casilu2008-06-25 02:49:07
QUOTE(Furien @ Jun 24 2008, 07:47 PM) 525661
Enfranchising the angels would have given them a vote, not granted Celestines an SK/Vig power. ><
I know, but what if we have that serial killer about? That was the focus of thw quote.
Revan2008-06-25 02:50:09
So wait, Thul called the Celestine killer when there was no message to indicate that there was on day 1. On da 2, the kill message was judgement from a Celestine... so I'm thinking that Thul is the Celestine killer. HOWEVER, that means that since the mafia/scum have been from other games, then a Celestine would be a townie... so... hmm, what gives?
Furien2008-06-25 02:50:23
QUOTE(casilu @ Jun 24 2008, 07:49 PM) 525663
I know, but what if we have that serial killer about? That was the focus of thw quote.
Oh, alright, I was misreading. Disregard!
Rika2008-06-25 02:50:54
QUOTE(casilu @ Jun 25 2008, 02:46 PM) 525659
That was what I was talking about. So, it's either serial killer Celestine or Vig.
Oh, ok. But it seems more likely that a Celestine will be pro-town, as with all other Lusternian role. So I'm sticking with the vig/other nightkiller roleblock on night zero.
Casilu2008-06-25 02:51:02
QUOTE(Revan @ Jun 24 2008, 07:50 PM) 525664
So wait, Thul called the Celestine killer when there was no message to indicate that there was on day 1. On da 2, the kill message was judgement from a Celestine... so I'm thinking that Thul is the Celestine killer. HOWEVER, that means that since the mafia/scum have been from other games, then a Celestine would be a townie... so... hmm, what gives?
Talkan?
Rika2008-06-25 02:53:06
QUOTE(Revan @ Jun 25 2008, 02:50 PM) 525664
So wait, Thul called the Celestine killer when there was no message to indicate that there was on day 1. On da 2, the kill message was judgement from a Celestine... so I'm thinking that Thul is the Celestine killer. HOWEVER, that means that since the mafia/scum have been from other games, then a Celestine would be a townie... so... hmm, what gives?
Remember, this Celestine SK thing was a theory started by Thul (according to Casilu's post). I'm just not seeing it being as viable as us having a Celestine vigilante who got roleblocked on the first night.
Revan2008-06-25 02:54:28
QUOTE(rika @ Jun 24 2008, 10:53 PM) 525668
Remember, this Celestine SK thing was a theory started by Thul (according to Casilu's post). I'm just not seeing it being as viable as us having a Celestine vigilante who got roleblocked on the first night.
but... the kill message was a Celestine kill... or wait, maybe a paladin?
Furien2008-06-25 02:54:45
QUOTE(rika @ Jun 24 2008, 07:53 PM) 525668
Remember, this Celestine SK thing was a theory started by Thul (according to Casilu's post). I'm just not seeing it being as viable as us having a Celestine vigilante who got roleblocked on the first night.
As stated, he could have chosen to not kill because there wasn't any information available.
Unknown2008-06-25 02:56:03
I think it's dangerous to assume anyone from Lusternia is town.. And I think it's also suspicious that Thul knew that there was a Celestine killer out there.. Much more suspicious than Revan's lurking. I see Thul posting though, so I'll wait until he finishes it to change my vote.
Rika2008-06-25 02:56:09
QUOTE(Revan @ Jun 25 2008, 02:54 PM) 525669
but... the kill message was a Celestine kill... or wait, maybe a paladin?
Which would support the Celestine/Paladin vigilante theory.
@Furien: Sure, that may have been the case too. Just saying that it's a lot more likely that he's on our side rather than being scum.
Unknown2008-06-25 02:57:47
QUOTE(rika @ Jun 24 2008, 07:56 PM) 525673
Which would support the Celestine/Paladin vigilante theory.
@Furien: Sure, that may have been the case too. Just saying that it's a lot more likely that he's on our side rather than being scum.
@Furien: Sure, that may have been the case too. Just saying that it's a lot more likely that he's on our side rather than being scum.
What if he has two kill methods and got both kills? I think it's a pretty big slip up, and I don't trusti t.
Celestines could kill with magic (CosmicFire). I could totally see Shamarah giving a killer two kill conditions to let them go stealth.
Revan2008-06-25 02:58:12
Vis, I don't lurk, sheesh. Othero and Okin are doing what you call"lurking". I do no such thing. Try another argument.
Furien2008-06-25 03:00:01
QUOTE(Revan @ Jun 24 2008, 07:58 PM) 525676
Vis, I don't lurk, sheesh. Othero and Okin are doing what you call"lurking". I do no such thing. Try another argument.
Does anyone find this more than slightly suspiciously spontaneous, considering he's already posted before this and just now jumps up and points fingers?
