Aha, that's right! I'm so glad that rule was put into place.

Everybody?

I point out scummy behavior. When somebody does something which I think could benefit them if they were scum, I point it out.

Frankly not convinced Dag would come up with something that clever..

Last game he illusioned the mod threatening about talking about the game outside the game.

Yeah.. And the idea that a "Bag of tricks" is a one shot, kinda doesn't make sense.

Yes, but you paint everyone with the same broad brush. Some of us may agree with our current leader, and some may not, and I'd like to think that in either case, it's because they've thought the situation through and come to a decision on their own- not simply because that's what he believes.

But, it isn't the first time a power was named strangely or thought too powerful to exist.

Curiously enough my leader title did not come with a magic "force people to agree with you" button. I wish it had, would make things much easier.

Sorry, I want to clarify that it's not that I think it should be a 100% successful use every time, but that even if the chance of something happening is 50/50, the term 'bag of tricks' suggests that it's anything but one-shot.

Whether or not he can use it more than once, I honestly don't think he would at Visaeris's request. Their rivalry seems fairly intense.

True enough, but I believe it was Sil who was asking for the use.

And I have to admit, strange globes hitting people at random instill the same kinda of fear as One-shot vigs using it day 1. (Good job though, you got em!).

So, I'm very, very happy he didn't use it, even if he could.

Neat thing is he could've ignored me, but he's just outright said it was one shot. If someone investigates him and finds out he wasn't being truthful, well... You lynch liars, because they compromise things. So he's either being honest or he's confident he won't get caught. It's irrelevant at this point.



No, it was me.

Now, where did Rika go.. She's on the forums still..

I haven't taken all the claims at their face value. I only did that once, to choose the leader. The thing is we've already gone through the role claims a few times. Silvanus' role claim had quite a few holes. After a bit of poking, he gave a better roleclaim. Some chose not to believe him, and you jumped on those people. Requiem's claim of having the second ability, innate leadership, was found a bit suspicious by some people. I already stated that I wasn't part of this group. The rest have all had pretty sound roleclaims.



I'm sorry I cannot post as convincingly as you. I am not going to be stupid and actually press something that clearly no one else wants.



No, Silvanus was, according to your post about two or three posts before mine at seven posts. We were on page sixteen and still day one. I was getting pretty annoyed at how we were going around in circles. So yes, that vote was because everyone else decided they found Silvanus suspicious again.

As for the amount of contributions I've made, what has been accepted is a lot less than what I have actually tried to contribute. I'm a very slow reader and typer, and usually by the time I can finish reading/posting, the points I try to make have already been made by someone else.

I figured out after I used it that, I was supposed to wait to buy some things from the store, or have some challenge happen and then use it later in the game. I didn't read the hints in my role closely enough.

I also thought that since I had a bag of tricks with unkown effects that it was a once per day, not once per game role.

@visaeris: But it doesn't matter, we've lost anyway, you can lynch me if you feel the urge to get revenge for someone being so vocal as in not believing your role. I give you the benefit of power because you are unlynchable and people want to believe that they made the right choice in something they can't undo.

@lolrick: With people like you who are just willing to sell thier vote away, I don't see how one can think that people are voting because they have tought things through. I mean, look how quickly everyone jumped from Requim to Rika. yes, I voted for Rika as well, but on my own, before anyone made lenghtly posts detailing the clues to you. People need to know how to come to these conclusions without requiring other people to spoon feed it to them.

Ah, hmm, well. There you go.

And now I'm off to dinner. Will be back soonish.

Why is Daganev being so defensive when nobody was really accusing him of anything?

Unvote: Requiem
Vote: Daganev

Things happen when people are pushed, people slip up. Daganev's prone to slip up somewhere most likely, besides pressuring requiem now seems useless since hes not here. I've been suspicious of Daganev before anybody else because of Arix and Thul(I think it was Thul) jumping to nominate him as leader based on very little (then trying to distance themselves from him).

You know what, yeah, I suspect Dag as being scum more at this point than I do Rika.

Vote: Daganev

Hang on let me find my violin.



I meant the guy was sitting at 7 votes, just lynches away. It was a typo on my part. Regardless, I'm glad you've confirmed that, and you've admitted that you voted for him just to move things along without any real solid evidence.

You're at 6 votes, 2 away from a lynch. Would you like to roleclaim or offer an affirmative defense against the charges I've levelled at you: unhelpfulness, eagerness to ride the bandwagon, and a distinct odor of scum.