Shiri2008-08-11 04:40:49
Oh, and someone compare lists of non-Silvanus people who were in BOTH bandwagons so we can find out the doublevoter.
Shiri2008-08-11 04:40:51
Oh, and someone compare lists of non-Silvanus people who were in BOTH bandwagons so we can find out the doublevoter.
Unknown2008-08-11 04:40:56
Oh I guess this puts Revan and Lorick in the clear, since I doubt they'd so easily lynch their own Traitor leader...
Unknown2008-08-11 04:43:20
QUOTE(Shou @ Aug 11 2008, 12:40 AM) 543828
Oh I guess this puts Revan and Lorick in the clear, since I doubt they'd so easily lynch their own Traitor leader...
Unless they were the other two Fates?
Shiri2008-08-11 04:46:54
QUOTE(Myrkr @ Aug 11 2008, 05:43 AM) 543831
Unless they were the other two Fates?
By no means are those two in the clear. But I want Silferras and req to wake up first!
Xenthos2008-08-11 04:48:51
So... can someone eat corpses? :/ Since Fain was the one who had the ability to raise bodies with his potion. Unless the Bearer has something to do with it.
Xenthos2008-08-11 05:12:15
Since everyone is out in Lack of Rants, guess I'll do it:
Bandwagon 1:
Silvanus, Shayle, Xenthos, Myrkr, requiem, Daganev, Archer, Revan
Bandwagon 2:
Shou, Silferras, Nejii, Xenthos, requiem, Daganev, Lorick, Revan
Requiem claimed "no double-vote," I certainly don't have it, Revan's claimed vanilla-townie (with night-talk to Lorick), which leaves... Daganev. (Does a double-vote make sense for Crumkane?)
Bandwagon 1:
Silvanus, Shayle, Xenthos, Myrkr, requiem, Daganev, Archer, Revan
Bandwagon 2:
Shou, Silferras, Nejii, Xenthos, requiem, Daganev, Lorick, Revan
Requiem claimed "no double-vote," I certainly don't have it, Revan's claimed vanilla-townie (with night-talk to Lorick), which leaves... Daganev. (Does a double-vote make sense for Crumkane?)
Shiri2008-08-11 05:13:48
A double-vote doesn't make sense for Crumkane, but I won't rule it out anyway.
Unknown2008-08-11 05:45:05
bahu... eaten by a Soulless... nice.
Unknown2008-08-11 05:50:02
QUOTE(Xenthos @ Aug 11 2008, 01:12 AM) 543858
Since everyone is out in Lack of Rants, guess I'll do it:
Bandwagon 1:
Silvanus, Shayle, Xenthos, Myrkr, requiem, Daganev, Archer, Revan
Bandwagon 2:
Shou, Silferras, Nejii, Xenthos, requiem, Daganev, Lorick, Revan
Requiem claimed "no double-vote," I certainly don't have it, Revan's claimed vanilla-townie (with night-talk to Lorick), which leaves... Daganev. (Does a double-vote make sense for Crumkane?)
Bandwagon 1:
Silvanus, Shayle, Xenthos, Myrkr, requiem, Daganev, Archer, Revan
Bandwagon 2:
Shou, Silferras, Nejii, Xenthos, requiem, Daganev, Lorick, Revan
Requiem claimed "no double-vote," I certainly don't have it, Revan's claimed vanilla-townie (with night-talk to Lorick), which leaves... Daganev. (Does a double-vote make sense for Crumkane?)
If Revan was the last to vote on both, then I'm thinking he may be the double-voter.
Unknown2008-08-11 05:54:21
Btw, I'm thinking Lorick's claim (and as such Revan's) is sound for one reason:
Lorick very early stated something about "being united in the fight against the Soulless and the Twelve". I just read back and Saaga's role as Illith said nothing about the Twelve. Likewise, Fain's / Morgfyre's didn't mention the Soulless. And the Fates role has no mention of either.
Summary: I don't see it how he could have made that up, when he said it before we killed any of them and as such did not know we were up against them back then.
Lorick very early stated something about "being united in the fight against the Soulless and the Twelve". I just read back and Saaga's role as Illith said nothing about the Twelve. Likewise, Fain's / Morgfyre's didn't mention the Soulless. And the Fates role has no mention of either.
Summary: I don't see it how he could have made that up, when he said it before we killed any of them and as such did not know we were up against them back then.
Unknown2008-08-11 05:59:05
Hmn. I think we still have too many Elder-claims...
Shiri2008-08-11 05:59:18
While I wait for req/silferras to get up,
Vote: Revan.
I think he and Lorick are the remaining Fates. The ambiguity (which they later narrowed down to 2) over the size of their "mason group" is telling. The fact Lorick keeps asking me to investigate him smells of A), a bluff, relying on innocence, or C) both.
I could be wrong though, and depending on what Silferras and Requiem tell me I may change my target to someone else entirely.
Vote: Revan.
I think he and Lorick are the remaining Fates. The ambiguity (which they later narrowed down to 2) over the size of their "mason group" is telling. The fact Lorick keeps asking me to investigate him smells of A), a bluff, relying on innocence, or C) both.
I could be wrong though, and depending on what Silferras and Requiem tell me I may change my target to someone else entirely.
Unknown2008-08-11 06:01:07
As I pointed out before, I think it's possible they are the missing fates, which Shiri has just echoed. So, I'm also going to go ahead and Vote: Revan.
Besides, if Revan turns up clear, so does Lorick, right?
Besides, if Revan turns up clear, so does Lorick, right?
Xenthos2008-08-11 06:09:36
QUOTE(Shiri @ Aug 11 2008, 01:59 AM) 543876
While I wait for req/silferras to get up,
Vote: Revan.
I think he and Lorick are the remaining Fates. The ambiguity (which they later narrowed down to 2) over the size of their "mason group" is telling. The fact Lorick keeps asking me to investigate him smells of A), a bluff, relying on innocence, or C) both.
I could be wrong though, and depending on what Silferras and Requiem tell me I may change my target to someone else entirely.
Vote: Revan.
I think he and Lorick are the remaining Fates. The ambiguity (which they later narrowed down to 2) over the size of their "mason group" is telling. The fact Lorick keeps asking me to investigate him smells of A), a bluff, relying on innocence, or C) both.
I could be wrong though, and depending on what Silferras and Requiem tell me I may change my target to someone else entirely.
So we're to take it that your investigation whiffed? I know you said you didn't want to reveal it, but the way you're not even hinting that you're voting due to whatever you found out does seem somewhat telling...
Shiri2008-08-11 06:12:47
My investigation didn't whiff.
Shiri2008-08-11 06:13:50
And if it had, that would be a retarded thing to point out! (Although it's correct that I'm not voting Revan because of my investigation, because I need a couple things from those two people to complete a theory.)
Unknown2008-08-11 06:14:08
.. Shiri, you say I should post and then you ignore my posts? GTFO
Shiri2008-08-11 06:16:30
QUOTE(shadow @ Aug 11 2008, 07:14 AM) 543886
.. Shiri, you say I should post and then you ignore my posts? GTFO
I wasn't ignoring you, I just happen to disagree! And if you don't like me voting Revan, vote someone else!
Xenthos2008-08-11 06:20:26
QUOTE(Shiri @ Aug 11 2008, 02:13 AM) 543884
And if it had, that would be a retarded thing to point out! (Although it's correct that I'm not voting Revan because of my investigation, because I need a couple things from those two people to complete a theory.)
It's not exactly like it's a stretch, given what you'd posted up until the "it didn't whiff," to come to that conclusion. Why would you call it retarded to point out something that seems pretty obvious? Hmph.