To reiterate - are we going to get a replacement for Serella yet? If not, I'm going to go ahead and vote for her.

Also, grahh to people who need to post but haven't popped in.

I came up with Serella, and I cannot understand why people are voting Shou. It all adds up to me.

Shou: claims he can't roleclaim. Myrkr: claims he knows more about Fain than he can tell. Daganev: points out this link and the CORRECT conclusion to draw from it when no one else noticed it. These three can't ALL be scum because that would make 5, for a total 9/20 scum in the whole game.

And I still want req to freakin' wake up.

You should vote Serella anyway: inactive or not I think her roleclaim doesn't fit.

... I meant the results of the scry. Since you say you found something, I'd really like to be able to analyze it (today, not after another night-phase), which means not voting for anybody until it's actually out there. Especially since we appear to have absolutely no ability to actually stop two short of the lynch.

We only have me and Dags on Serella. What do we need to lynch again, 7?

It's both her inactivity and general suspicious roleclaim together that's firing off scum-signals, but it's annoying to build up a case against someone, muster up the people to lynch them, then have them replaced by someone who would probably go 'I'm innocent, I'm innocent, this is why!' and losing the entire train.

Not to mention that we haven't taken Shiri's information into account yet, like Xenthos mentioned. Could you furnish us with some explanation or speculation, at least, as to why this hinges so completely on a roleclaim from requiem? We might not even get anything from him.

I'm inclined to not vote on Serella because:

1) She'll probably get replaced
1a) If she gets replaced, we'll all taking our votes off of her.
1a1) If that happens, this day will be longer.

No we won't all be taking all our votes off her, I keep saying this. If she's replaced we should -still- keep our votes on her because her roleclaim is scummy and possibly inconsistent with what we know.

I can't remember if I voted but just to be sure. Vote: Serrella

That's 3. Let's go up to 5, then 7 if she hasn't been replaced in, say, 8 hours from this post. (if she has, let the replacement speak up I guess but DO NOT REMOVE VOTES IMMEDIATELY)

Alright, since Shiri thinks that this won't contradict the results of his investigation (which we still don't know.. ), I see no reason why I should hold my vote for the moment. We'll cross the bridge when we come to it, if Serella is replaced.

Vote: Serella

Fine, fine, Shiri... I'll hop on your wagon.

Unvote.

Vote: Serella.

Ok, that's 5. We can probably wait a while, then finish her off later if she doesn't get replaced AND have a really good excuse or something, otherwise we can finish her off.

Or our super-dee-duper double voter can pop up and ninja lynch her, which's happened twice now.

Yeah, but this time anyone voting has had plenty of warning to know that THE NEXT PERSON TO VOTE WILL PROBABLY LYNCH OUT SERELLA so we can lynch them the day after!

Oho, nice plan.

Unless we get a ninja-lyncher vote and then a regular vote right after so that it's a lynch but too quick for Rika to intercede.

Which would... suck.

how long are we waiting for the silent lurking scum?

also, I'm going to unvote Serella Just to prove I don't have the double vote

Gah, fine, someone revote in his place.

It's kind of interesting how the scum so far are all lurky-quiet, or just plain unable/unwilling to defend themselves when called out.

Depressing too.