Rika2008-10-01 05:36:16
I'm going to hold on my voting until people give more information. And if they don't soon, they get my vote.
Casilu2008-10-01 05:40:40
QUOTE(rika @ Sep 30 2008, 10:36 PM) 565167
I'm going to hold on my voting until people give more information. And if they don't soon, they get my vote.
We have all the information in the world! FOS: Rika.
Shiri2008-10-01 05:43:10
Actually, let's have Silferras target Casilu tonight. Or Celina.
Unknown2008-10-01 05:44:23
Alright, I've done a quick read-through. Since I don't need to hide my role, I don't see any reason to withhold information. Doing so only helps the scumbags since they're the informed minority.
I targetted Rika last night, who was not targetted by anyone else to my knowledge. I only say this because if Shaddus targetted me, my target may have been changed without my knowledge. Since Shaddus is dead, there's no way to clearly verify my information.
Reason: Double-voters can be very scary to scumbags if left alive.
As for voting, I agree that we should have more to go on than in a typical game and therefore random voting is a bit silly. However, I want to re-read more carefully for scummy behavior before I vote. Right now Casilu is sticking out to me, but the quick to start bandwagon on him concerns me.
I targetted Rika last night, who was not targetted by anyone else to my knowledge. I only say this because if Shaddus targetted me, my target may have been changed without my knowledge. Since Shaddus is dead, there's no way to clearly verify my information.
Reason: Double-voters can be very scary to scumbags if left alive.
As for voting, I agree that we should have more to go on than in a typical game and therefore random voting is a bit silly. However, I want to re-read more carefully for scummy behavior before I vote. Right now Casilu is sticking out to me, but the quick to start bandwagon on him concerns me.
Casilu2008-10-01 05:46:25
QUOTE(rhayni @ Sep 30 2008, 10:44 PM) 565171
but the quick to start bandwagon on him concerns me.
Unknown2008-10-01 05:48:08
Sorry, unfortunately there's no indicator on these forums for male or female and I don't know most of you.
Casilu2008-10-01 05:48:32
Actually, now that I think about it, this seems like the only game where voting no lynch might actually be beneficial, so...
Unvote, Vote: No lynch
Unvote, Vote: No lynch
Casilu2008-10-01 05:49:11
QUOTE(rhayni @ Sep 30 2008, 10:48 PM) 565174
Sorry, unfortunately there's no indicator on these forums for male or female and I don't know most of you.
I figured the fairy avatar would give it away.
Shiri2008-10-01 05:49:53
QUOTE(rhayni @ Oct 1 2008, 06:44 AM) 565171
Alright, I've done a quick read-through. Since I don't need to hide my role, I don't see any reason to withhold information. Doing so only helps the scumbags since they're the informed minority.
I targetted Rika last night, who was not targetted by anyone else to my knowledge. I only say this because if Shaddus targetted me, my target may have been changed without my knowledge. Since Shaddus is dead, there's no way to clearly verify my information.
Reason: Double-voters can be very scary to scumbags if left alive.
As for voting, I agree that we should have more to go on than in a typical game and therefore random voting is a bit silly. However, I want to re-read more carefully for scummy behavior before I vote. Right now Casilu is sticking out to me, but the quick to start bandwagon on him concerns me.
I targetted Rika last night, who was not targetted by anyone else to my knowledge. I only say this because if Shaddus targetted me, my target may have been changed without my knowledge. Since Shaddus is dead, there's no way to clearly verify my information.
Reason: Double-voters can be very scary to scumbags if left alive.
As for voting, I agree that we should have more to go on than in a typical game and therefore random voting is a bit silly. However, I want to re-read more carefully for scummy behavior before I vote. Right now Casilu is sticking out to me, but the quick to start bandwagon on him concerns me.
It's not "a bandwagon", it's me and Simon voting her for trying to suppress information. I'm torn between thinking her play is generally this dubious after her spam splashing made us all highly suspicious last game, and thinking she's the canadian trying to be subtle. Fortunately we have ways of dealing with the latter scenario this game.
Doman2008-10-01 05:50:05
Casilu is acting like she wants lynched -eye- -EEEEYYYEEE-
Rika2008-10-01 05:50:09
I actually chose the double-vote because that would make me one of the lowest priority targets by the scum! (Just watch. I'll die tonight). 
Shiri2008-10-01 05:50:13
QUOTE(casilu @ Oct 1 2008, 06:48 AM) 565175
Actually, now that I think about it, this seems like the only game where voting no lynch might actually be beneficial, so...
Unvote, Vote: No lynch
Unvote, Vote: No lynch
...why would it be beneficial?
Unknown2008-10-01 05:53:03
Casilu, please explain why you think no-lynching is beneficial to the town. Generally speaking, no-lynching is detrimental to the town because it's the best way for us to find and eliminate scum. Voting no-lynch is a scum move.
And Shiri, I thought Casilu had three votes, which constitutes a bandwagon to me.
And Shiri, I thought Casilu had three votes, which constitutes a bandwagon to me.
Unknown2008-10-01 05:53:45
Rika, I suppose I look at it differently. But then, I've played a lot of mafia. 
Casilu2008-10-01 05:54:42
QUOTE(Shiri @ Sep 30 2008, 10:50 PM) 565180
...why would it be beneficial?
You can outpace scum killing with the daykill and the nightkill every other night.
Unknown2008-10-01 05:55:03
QUOTE(rhayni @ Oct 1 2008, 01:53 AM) 565182
And Shiri, I thought Casilu had three votes, which constitutes a bandwagon to me.
No, it's two votes. She just claimed there were three... I'm a little bewildered at that, because it's not like there have been a lot of votes to get confused about so far.
Casilu2008-10-01 05:56:12
QUOTE(Simon the Conquerer @ Sep 30 2008, 10:55 PM) 565185
No, it's two votes. She just claimed there were three... I'm a little bewildered at that, because it's not like there have been a lot of votes to get confused about so far.
Three votes so far, mine and the two of yours.
Also, I assume that our vigilante and our day-killer aren't mafia.
Unknown2008-10-01 05:57:47
It's -not- about kill numbers, Casilu. Information about people can be gathered by their voting records. Also, we don't know if our daykiller/nightkiller people are town or not. .... But you might.
vote: Casilu
vote: Casilu
Shiri2008-10-01 05:58:17
QUOTE(casilu @ Oct 1 2008, 06:56 AM) 565186
Three votes so far, mine and the two of yours.
Also, I assume that our vigilante and our day-killer aren't mafia.
Also, I assume that our vigilante and our day-killer aren't mafia.
Which is NOT a good assumption to make as it's easily possible for either or both to be.
Unknown2008-10-01 05:59:33
QUOTE(casilu @ Oct 1 2008, 01:56 AM) 565186
Three votes so far, mine and the two of yours.
Also, I assume that our vigilante and our day-killer aren't mafia.
Also, I assume that our vigilante and our day-killer aren't mafia.
Oh, I read you as saying that there were three votes on YOU.
And why would you assume that?
