Okay, I just checked up on who has and hasn't been posting. Silvanus, who has been in the game since the beginning, has only made 6 posts. Six. While Arix, who is newly joined in the past 12-ish hours, has made more. I can't say if he's been on the forums or not (probably not, he has to work, correct?) but he really hasn't offered anything here. Salvation needs to chat a bit more as well, he's still pretty low and has flimsy reasons for voting for people.
Silvanus was around 3 and a half hours ago, when I made the 'I also don't like Silvanus' lurking' post. I thought he would have taken the hint and posted something.
Rika2008-10-11 00:01:44
WTF? Even with 6/7 people voting nay for the deadline?
Unknown2008-10-11 00:03:25
QUOTE(rika @ Oct 10 2008, 08:01 PM) 569247
WTF? Even with 6/7 people voting nay for the deadline?
You're one person off.
Rika2008-10-11 00:09:19
Seriously, no offence or anything, but you're rushing things. 6/7 voters is a majority for those who will be voting.
Unknown2008-10-11 00:51:34
If you're in this mafia game, on the forums, and haven't even voted for the deadline, I suggest you do soon.
Daganev2008-10-11 01:01:58
Sorry, I'm just not trusting something about Xavius Vote Xavius
I hope I'm not wrong about this...
Xavius2008-10-11 01:22:50
You are wrong. Perpetually, Dag. Your wrongness extends well beyond the reaches of any one thread.
Anyways, Deadline nay Unvote Rika Vote Silvanus
Deadline for good sense Rika because the deadline is coming up and even smilies can't convey sarcasm to some of you Silvanus because the deadling is coming up and, if someone has to die, it might as well be a lurker.
Rika2008-10-11 01:24:30
Yay no deadline anymore.
Silvanus2008-10-11 01:26:24
Rika fails at life, my lurkiness was making one post and leaving the forums. I was not around when you made that post, Rika, and I'm keeping my vote on you.
And I've put up a lot more on these boards in my six posts then most people have to begin with (considering I did give half my role and saying my only power).
And, because it's been beaten at so many times, I'm going to go ahead and give my alignment.
I am pro-town. I am not town. My win condition is not the town win condition. My win condition does not prevent the town from winning. My win condition requires the town to not lose.
Thank you.
Unknown2008-10-11 05:34:54
This is your crazy mod speaking!
It is currently about 1:35 AM EST.
In about 11 hours, I will be heading out to go see Miracle at St. Anna. That means you'll need to do your own vote counts all on your own!
I'll tell you how it is when I get back!
Diamondais2008-10-11 14:43:59
We're still going?
Unknown2008-10-11 14:51:44
I have no problem with lynching someone claiming to be a neutral rather than risking A - pulling another claim out of someone who may possibly be town and in turn giving scum more of a chance to hit an important town target tonight or B - Lynching someone who may be in fact town on weak reasoning. Unless someone comes up with better reasoning than 'Rika is always scum' or 'So and so hasn't posted enough.', my vote is staying where it is. I don't really see anyone as lurking so much as I see busy people who are posting when they can.
Too many claims for day one. If we continue as we have, we might as well mass-claim. And I think mass-claiming on day 1 is laaaaame.
Again, weekends are busy for me as I have only enough time to work and sleep. I'll post when I can.
Unknown2008-10-11 16:20:29
QUOTE(diamondais @ Oct 11 2008, 10:43 AM) 569375
We're still going?
My thoughts exactly...
Noola2008-10-11 16:33:03
QUOTE(Myrkr @ Oct 11 2008, 11:20 AM) 569381
My thoughts exactly...
Pfft, so it's gonna be a long game. Doesn't make it unfun.
Xavius2008-10-11 17:15:03
QUOTE(rhayni @ Oct 11 2008, 09:51 AM) 569376
I have no problem with lynching someone claiming to be a neutral rather than risking A - pulling another claim out of someone who may possibly be town and in turn giving scum more of a chance to hit an important town target tonight or B - Lynching someone who may be in fact town on weak reasoning.
Not neutral. Pro-town. Just not town. It's "not town" because my win condition is not the town's win condition. It's a freakishly impossible win condition that the mod tagged me with. If there's going to be any chance of me pulling it off, I need scum to die pretty close to every day, doctors and roleblockers to succeed in saving lives about half the time, and offer animal sacrifices to the RNG gods. If the town loses, I lose. Really, I can lose before you lose if the mafia converter doesn't die soon enough.
Noola2008-10-11 17:35:14
Alright, well, that makes sense. I suppose it explains the fervor to have Shaddus lynched too. Unvote.
I suppose I'll make my vote a lurker vote too. It's the only thing I can do, cause I don't see where anyone else is being suspicious yet.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Seriously, no offence or anything, but you're rushing things. 6/7 voters is a majority for those who will be voting.
Doesn't make it unfun. 
