Daganev2008-10-30 00:17:25
QUOTE(Doman @ Oct 29 2008, 05:16 PM) 577297
I won't be here much tonight, but I'll leave my vote off for now.
Who votes we bandwagon Doman?
Diamondais2008-10-30 00:18:52
QUOTE(daganev @ Oct 29 2008, 08:07 PM) 577289
What I mean is, the reason you stated that you voted for Shaddus was because of the fact that he claimed invisible woman with silver surfer. You thought that pairing was odd, because it didn't seem much inline with what we known from cannon.
However, earlier you were just explaining to shiri, why it would be a bad idea to go off of such knowlege because of how information was wierd in the UN game. Yet you voted for shaddus (possibly lynching him) anyways.
(ofcourse a simple internet search would have shown that infact, they were paired in the movies, but for some reason everyone else was too anxious to lynch him to bother to go check).
However, earlier you were just explaining to shiri, why it would be a bad idea to go off of such knowlege because of how information was wierd in the UN game. Yet you voted for shaddus (possibly lynching him) anyways.
(ofcourse a simple internet search would have shown that infact, they were paired in the movies, but for some reason everyone else was too anxious to lynch him to bother to go check).
Yes, I did have trouble believing it but I did add in I was uncertain.
"That's a weird role pairing even if it isn't true, you guys have to realize just how unbelievable that is. (Of course, it does fall into do we believe it because of precedent like Cuba owning Nukes and not being Communist? unsure.gif )
It seems safer to vote for him right now; Unvote, Vote: Shaddus.
Hopefully this is safe. "
It could have easily have been him attempting to throw us off, or a bad defence.
Casilu2008-10-30 00:19:31
QUOTE(Arix @ Oct 29 2008, 05:10 PM) 577291
I say Magneto because he's the only villain that springs to mind as being almost exclusively tied in with the X-men.
Apocalypse.
Diamondais2008-10-30 00:20:38
You people posted while I was posting. 
I wasn't in long.
I wasn't in long.Casilu2008-10-30 00:21:51
QUOTE(casilu @ Oct 29 2008, 05:19 PM) 577303
Apocalypse.
Also, let's hope we don't have Onslaught, but I really doubt we would.
Daganev2008-10-30 00:22:10
QUOTE(diamondais @ Oct 29 2008, 05:18 PM) 577302
Yes, I did have trouble believing it but I did add in I was uncertain.
"That's a weird role pairing even if it isn't true, you guys have to realize just how unbelievable that is. (Of course, it does fall into do we believe it because of precedent like Cuba owning Nukes and not being Communist? unsure.gif )
It seems safer to vote for him right now; Unvote, Vote: Shaddus.
Hopefully this is safe. "
It could have easily have been him attempting to throw us off, or a bad defence.
"That's a weird role pairing even if it isn't true, you guys have to realize just how unbelievable that is. (Of course, it does fall into do we believe it because of precedent like Cuba owning Nukes and not being Communist? unsure.gif )
It seems safer to vote for him right now; Unvote, Vote: Shaddus.
Hopefully this is safe. "
It could have easily have been him attempting to throw us off, or a bad defence.
It could have been, but I had a very strong feeling that it wasn't. But the fact that you joined in with me, in warning people about such claims, but voted anyways based on that type of claim, makes me think that you only joined in with me in the first place, because you thought it would help you come up with a fake claim yourself.
Hope that wasn't too convoluted.
In short, I think the reason why you voted for Shaddus, is because you didn't really believe the argument, that we shouldn't use outside knowledge to evaluate claims.
I think the only reason why you argued with Shiri, in support of that argument, was so that you could use it yourself, in case your fake claim wasn't so good.
Diamondais2008-10-30 00:22:28
QUOTE(casilu @ Oct 29 2008, 08:21 PM) 577305
Also, let's hope we don't have Onslaught, but I really doubt we would.
What/who was Onslaught?
Casilu2008-10-30 00:23:44
QUOTE(diamondais @ Oct 29 2008, 05:22 PM) 577307
What/who was Onslaught?
Magneto's mind + Xavier's power= Onslaught.
Daganev2008-10-30 00:24:20
Arix2008-10-30 00:27:27
Also, why are we bandwagoning Doman?
Daganev2008-10-30 00:28:01
Arix2008-10-30 00:29:07
Like I said, dime a dozen
Rika2008-10-30 00:42:11
QUOTE(daganev @ Oct 30 2008, 01:28 PM) 577311
I'll give you guys a clue. All the villians in this game are there.
Diamondais2008-10-30 00:55:35
QUOTE(Arix @ Oct 29 2008, 08:27 PM) 577310
Also, why are we bandwagoning Doman?
I think that was Daganev having a joke on Doman.
Diamondais2008-10-30 00:57:15
And oh boy at that list. They do like their evil people in Marval.
Furien2008-10-30 01:33:23
Lost our rezzer -and- roleblocker...
I couldn't tell if you were all being serious or not, but if Shiri's a Vig, I'm pretty sure he's smart enough to hold off kills on the first night. That's generally a bad move for any Vigilante- he avoided it last game, just as I did in the Pokemon game as Absol.
Unless, of course, he's SK, but we have..nothing to base that assumption on, really. While I do find his voting for Shaddus slightly suspicious, it isn't much.
I couldn't tell if you were all being serious or not, but if Shiri's a Vig, I'm pretty sure he's smart enough to hold off kills on the first night. That's generally a bad move for any Vigilante- he avoided it last game, just as I did in the Pokemon game as Absol.
Unless, of course, he's SK, but we have..nothing to base that assumption on, really. While I do find his voting for Shaddus slightly suspicious, it isn't much.
Shiri2008-10-30 01:50:57
I'm not a vig and I didn't kill Krin. As far as I was concerned Krin was proven innocent after our lynch whiffed on Shaddus, so killing him would have been dumb. I don't think my reasoning during the day was bad though.
I am not quite understanding this bandwagon on Dylara. It seems like I misunderstood Daganev's original point about not using comics canon...which neither Dylara nor I did, mind, we REFRAINED from using comics canon (which was the problem.) Now it turns out Daganev was correct, although bringing that up before the lynch would've been nice - I assume he was out at the time though so I'll let that one go. But since we made a different mistake to the one stated, fuelled largely by Krin's dubious claim and Shaddus' poor reasoning and then getting (or faking being) angry when called it, it doesn't seem like a good reason to target her.
I am not quite understanding this bandwagon on Dylara. It seems like I misunderstood Daganev's original point about not using comics canon...which neither Dylara nor I did, mind, we REFRAINED from using comics canon (which was the problem.) Now it turns out Daganev was correct, although bringing that up before the lynch would've been nice - I assume he was out at the time though so I'll let that one go. But since we made a different mistake to the one stated, fuelled largely by Krin's dubious claim and Shaddus' poor reasoning and then getting (or faking being) angry when called it, it doesn't seem like a good reason to target her.
Shaddus2008-10-30 02:06:42
Great, I'm screwed.
You gave me something to read, I'll be gone for about a week
You gave me something to read, I'll be gone for about a week
Celina2008-10-30 04:06:27
Wtf, the Silver Surger turned good? That's just confusing.
Shiri2008-10-30 04:10:50
QUOTE(Celina @ Oct 30 2008, 04:06 AM) 577385
Wtf, the Silver Surger turned good? That's just confusing.
Well...I do remember him having his own comic for a longass time (and a saturday morning TV show?) So unless he was a villain protagonist, which I doubt, he was definitely good at some point. It could easily have gone either way with the galactus thing though. Krin really should have told us about that: since he already gave his name out, it's not like naming the ability would have made a difference to Galactus targetting him (if that was what happened.)
