Marvel Superheroes/Supervillians Mafia!

by Rika

Back to The Real World.

Shiri2008-10-28 00:58:37
Which turned out to be the correct move.

OH. Unless he meant we shouldn't start talking as if canonically dead superheroes etc. don't count. I could buy that since that one isn't clear at all.
Shiri2008-10-28 00:59:38
QUOTE(diamondais @ Oct 28 2008, 12:57 AM) 576315
I think you're correct too, because it turned out to be unreliable and inaccurate.

I mean sure, some information was, but some.. Just wasn't. confused.gif

Wait, what? No it wasn't. Celina was mortal, Ilyarin/Shuyin/Desitrus were ascendants, Nejii was an ascendant who was a demigod previously, everyone else was a demigod and Acrune was a titan. Was anything about that -not- accurate?
Diamondais2008-10-28 01:03:23
QUOTE(Shiri @ Oct 27 2008, 08:59 PM) 576317
Wait, what? No it wasn't. Celina was mortal, Ilyarin/Shuyin/Desitrus were ascendants, Nejii was an ascendant who was a demigod previously, everyone else was a demigod and Acrune was a titan. Was anything about that -not- accurate?

Rika's UN one?

Rika didn't run the last one.
Rika2008-10-28 01:05:50
Vote count. As indecisive as ever. rolleyes.gif

Noola 1 Diamondais
Shiri 1 Daganev
Doman 1 Silferras
Dugan 2 Doman Celina
Krin 1 Myrkr
Furien 1 Dugan
Silferras 1 Noola
Ilyarin 1 Casilu
Diamondais 2 Shaddus Shiri
Myrkr 1 Furien
Daganev 1 Arix
Shiri2008-10-28 01:05:53
QUOTE(diamondais @ Oct 28 2008, 01:03 AM) 576319
Rika's UN one?

Rika didn't run the last one.


...oh. Right.

Unvote: Diamondais.
Diamondais2008-10-28 01:06:36
QUOTE(Shiri @ Oct 27 2008, 09:05 PM) 576323
...oh. Right.

Unvote: Diamondais.

I'm glad that's all cleared up, that was a tad confusing on both sides it seems. unsure.gif
Shaddus2008-10-28 01:48:29
QUOTE(diamondais @ Oct 27 2008, 08:06 PM) 576325
I'm glad that's all cleared up, that was a tad confusing on both sides it seems. unsure.gif

Know what's not confusing? Shiri is grasping at straws. He wants to hurry and lynch someone, so he's jumping on typing mistakes. Yet, last game he was telling people to slow down, and think before they vote. Maybe this will get the ball rolling.
UNVOTE, VOTE:SHIRI.
Shiri2008-10-28 01:55:55
QUOTE(Shaddus Mes @ Oct 28 2008, 01:48 AM) 576354
Know what's not confusing? Shiri is grasping at straws. He wants to hurry and lynch someone, so he's jumping on typing mistakes. Yet, last game he was telling people to slow down, and think before they vote. Maybe this will get the ball rolling.
UNVOTE, VOTE:SHIRI.

Vote: Shaddus for voting me when I try to stir up discussion and then unvote when what they meant becomes clearer. Trying to suppress discussion? Check. Dubious claim about grasping at straws when I clearly explained the reasoning and obviously wasn't pushing for a lynch? Check. Blatant incorrect claim about jumping on typing mistakes when I in fact interpreted the "should" as "shouldn't" and made no comment on it to start with? Check. Poor and counterproductive reasoning even if you're not scum.
Diamondais2008-10-28 02:02:59
Yeah, I was the only one who called out the spelling mistake. I see them immediately after I've completed a post.

I don't think Shiri is worth voting for at the moment, I understand where he misunderstood mine and Daganev's previous conversation.

Shaddus isn't looking too hot right now, but.. It could just be nothing.
Casilu2008-10-28 02:03:01
QUOTE(Shiri @ Oct 27 2008, 06:55 PM) 576360
Vote: Shaddus for voting me when I try to stir up discussion and then unvote when what they meant becomes clearer. Trying to suppress discussion? Check. Dubious claim about grasping at straws when I clearly explained the reasoning and obviously wasn't pushing for a lynch? Check. Blatant incorrect claim about jumping on typing mistakes when I in fact interpreted the "should" as "shouldn't" and made no comment on it to start with? Check. Poor and counterproductive reasoning even if you're not scum.


Was that an OMGUS vote?
Shiri2008-10-28 02:06:38
QUOTE(casilu @ Oct 28 2008, 02:03 AM) 576370
Was that an OMGUS vote?

Sort of? It wasn't the kind of OMGUS vote it would have been if I voted Daganev for voting for me. It was because Shaddus was using some bad rhetoric to vote for me, which may or may not be a sign of him playing scum badly, and is a sign of being counterproductive to town if it isn't!
Noola2008-10-28 02:07:24
I dunno. Shaddus did kinda jump on Shiri even though Shiri unvoted when it all got straightened out. Might be an OMGUS vote, but maybe a warranted one?
Shaddus2008-10-28 02:18:24
QUOTE(casilu @ Oct 27 2008, 09:03 PM) 576370
Was that an OMGUS vote?

Yes. Yes it was.
Arix2008-10-28 02:20:28
Unvote

VOTE SHADDUS


You seem to be trying to stir things up.

Also, I'm getting off the computer for awhile
Unknown2008-10-28 02:23:08
I'm scared Shaddus is actually mafia, but, consider his last two mafia games. Didn't get modkilled both times, I think?

He might not know just yet the right attitude to take for Mafia games.

But I'm still hesitant to go with this, because he might be Mafia and duping us all.

I guess I'll UNVOTE and VOTE: SHADDUS.

Shaddus, I really really really hope you're not mafia and can prove it... sad.gif
Diamondais2008-10-28 02:26:29
What's the majority vote in this again?
Shaddus2008-10-28 02:27:31
QUOTE(Myrkr @ Oct 27 2008, 09:23 PM) 576391
I'm scared Shaddus is actually mafia, but, consider his last two mafia games. Didn't get modkilled both times, I think?

He might not know just yet the right attitude to take for Mafia games.

But I'm still hesitant to go with this, because he might be Mafia and duping us all.

I guess I'll UNVOTE and VOTE: SHADDUS.

Shaddus, I really really really hope you're not mafia and can prove it... sad.gif

:facepalm:

Why is it in any mafia game, I end up getting lynched any time I take a leap and pick someone for something I find suspecious? Isn't that sor of the idea, especially the first day, when nobody has really done anything?

Fine, screw it.

UNVOTE: SHIRI.

Don't expect a vote from me the first day. If I get lynched, oh well. And no, I can't prove I'm not Mafia. I have two abilities, more or less, and neither of them would prove anything. Someone has that truth verifying thing, use it on this post.

I am not Mafia.

Unknown2008-10-28 02:31:13
You forgot to bold. doh.gif
Dugan2008-10-28 02:37:13
Goodness people, wth.

I do not think it is worthwhile to have any type of lynch on day 1, we have no clue as to whom anyone is. Can y'all just slow it down with the unvote and vote for junk. We have three different people who have each claimed to be a townie ... let someone (anyone) with the ability to investigate to find out ...

jm2c.
Shiri2008-10-28 03:03:09
QUOTE(Shaddus Mes @ Oct 28 2008, 02:27 AM) 576397
:facepalm:

Why is it in any mafia game, I end up getting lynched any time I take a leap and pick someone for something I find suspecious? Isn't that sor of the idea, especially the first day, when nobody has really done anything?

Fine, screw it.

UNVOTE: SHIRI.

Don't expect a vote from me the first day. If I get lynched, oh well. And no, I can't prove I'm not Mafia. I have two abilities, more or less, and neither of them would prove anything. Someone has that truth verifying thing, use it on this post.

I am not Mafia.

This is an overreaction. You get voted for if you use bad reasoning. -That- is the point. There's no giant conspiracy out to get you.

Dugan: it's almost always better to give the town a chance at lynching a scum day 1 than to let them go. Additionally you get more information that way, otherwise you're in the same situation day 2 but with a couple townies down (there's usually an SK.)
Also the investigator can only check one person at a time, and -everyone- will claim to be townie, so we have to take it on ourselves to do the work.