Um, that's the point he's been trying to get across throughout the whole thread........

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-world...Al.Qaida.Obama/

Is this enough to convince naysayers that Obama does not have the backing of terrorist organizations?

Both Al Qaida and the Weatherman were terrorist organizations. Neither would back eachother.

I'm not sure why people think that Al Qaida is the only terrorist organization in the world that we should be concerned about.

(not that I think Obama was associated with the weatherman, just pointing out that the argument is different)


edit: I mean with a news article like this:

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=75663...ionid=351020101

Do you think that now, we shouldn't worry about Iran having Nukes, or that perhaps we should lay off Al Qaida? Does that news article, now make you think that maybe Iran doesn't support terrorism now? (p.s. that would be a very silly conclusion)

For the record, I am well aware of the existance of the many and opposed terrorist organizations. I was specifically referring to a comment (that I think I read here) mentioning that Obama being elected would be the best thing for Al Quaida and Bin Laden.

Ahh,
From what you orginally said, I thought you were talking about Obama "palling around with terrorist", which is a different argument than saying that with Obama as president, things will be better for Al Qaida and Bin Laden.

Looks like he was actually a terrorist, who else would put Hillary in the White House anyway.

And I used to think he was my frieeeeeeeeend.

I was actually hoping he'd have her as his VP before he announced Biden.

he finally made her SoS after all this drama?

That appointment didn't surprise me one bit.

Ew, yuck.

That's creepy.

That scared the out of me. Thank you.

That one is actually very well done.

Here's another morph I found on another website.