Furien2009-02-18 23:03:10
QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 18 2009, 03:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I undertsand that excuse but you JUST SAID that you never made such a post.
I 'JUST SAID'- no, excuse me, JUST ASKED 'Where did I make this post?' because I honestly don't remember making it.
And once again, if you bother to look at the timeline instead of seizing on a small slip-up with an almost scummy bloodthirst, you'll see why the error is understandable. Miss Ike's post, see Ganondorf's death, add in current role knowledge. Result: Rebel/Scum/Big 4/Femme. SAW points out Loyalist addition, I continue with misconception up to now until someone starts becoming very obnoxious.
Daganev2009-02-18 23:05:03
QUOTE (Furien @ Feb 18 2009, 02:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And that statement, by itself, is...using the flavour text.
FoS right back at ya, buddy. (daganev)
FoS right back at ya, buddy. (daganev)
yes, I think it was obvious that I was using the flavor text. I was just making reference to the fact that flavor text is not really all that reliable (as I said earlier). It was just too much a coincidence to not make mention of it.
@shaddus: correct, I don't know who can be trusted and who can not. But I can see the scum signs that Furien is clearly projecting. (i.e. forgetting what he wrote, making a slip and declaring himself scum, making sure nobody gets lynched without his approval first)
Fania2009-02-18 23:06:05
Wow, I really didn't expect so many people to reveal so much on Day 1. It makes things easier and harder in some ways. Is anyone closer to voting?
Shamarah2009-02-18 23:07:33
Dai comes across as more newbie than scummy. Furien acting overly defensive and generally suspicious, what with the whole "oh hai gaiz I ttly misread my role but i'm not scum".
With nothing better to go on at the moment, I will Vote: Furien.
With nothing better to go on at the moment, I will Vote: Furien.
Furien2009-02-18 23:08:01
QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 18 2009, 03:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
yes, I think it was obvious that I was using the flavor text. I was just making reference to the fact that flavor text is not really all that reliable (as I said earlier). It was just too much a coincidence to not make mention of it.
@shaddus: correct, I don't know who can be trusted and who can not. But I can see the scum signs that Furien is clearly projecting. (i.e. forgetting what he wrote, making a slip and declaring himself scum, making sure nobody gets lynched without his approval first)
@shaddus: correct, I don't know who can be trusted and who can not. But I can see the scum signs that Furien is clearly projecting. (i.e. forgetting what he wrote, making a slip and declaring himself scum, making sure nobody gets lynched without his approval first)
Wow. Really? You don't want me to protect the Big 4 member I found? As soon as they get 60% of the votes I'd speak up, this isn't a 'Let's get to 7/8 and let me cast the final vote to confirm' scheme.
Shamarah2009-02-18 23:08:33
PS. What is it with people on these forums having a fetish for day one roleclaims, I remember this happening in past games too and it's so retarded. I'm looking at you in particular, Shiri.
Casilu2009-02-18 23:09:29
QUOTE (Shamarah @ Feb 18 2009, 03:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
PS. What is it with people on these forums having a fetish for day one roleclaims, I remember this happening in past games too and it's so retarded. I'm looking at you in particular, Shiri.
Think of how I feel. I got outed.
Daganev2009-02-18 23:09:31
QUOTE (Furien @ Feb 18 2009, 03:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I 'JUST SAID'- no, excuse me, JUST ASKED 'Where did I make this post?' because I honestly don't remember making it.
And once again, if you bother to look at the timeline instead of seizing on a small slip-up with an almost scummy bloodthirst, you'll see why the error is understandable. Miss Ike's post, see Ganondorf's death, add in current role knowledge. Result: Rebel/Scum/Big 4/Femme. SAW points out Loyalist addition, I continue with misconception up to now until someone starts becoming very obnoxious.
And once again, if you bother to look at the timeline instead of seizing on a small slip-up with an almost scummy bloodthirst, you'll see why the error is understandable. Miss Ike's post, see Ganondorf's death, add in current role knowledge. Result: Rebel/Scum/Big 4/Femme. SAW points out Loyalist addition, I continue with misconception up to now until someone starts becoming very obnoxious.
So is it your argument that you didn't read the bolded line in the following quote?
QUOTE
Lucas was Arix
QUOTE
Give light to the small one who, walks his path alone. You're Lucas.
A young shy boy with incredible psychic powers. You're the hero from Nowhere isles who saved the world from Pokey's selfish desire to destroy everything. With your friends Kumatora, Duster and Boney, you had an amazing adventure during which you learned courage and the value of not fleeing from difficult situations. But at the terrible cost of losing half your family. Now Lucas, fight to protect your new friends. Show them that you're no longer the crybaby of your youth, but a fine young man, worthy of wielding the awesome power that is PK Love.
You win with the Big Four. If they collapse, ou can win with the Loyalists or the Kids.
Your power is:
Psi Defence up α: Once a day, you may post in the forums “PSI Defence up α: (person)†to make it harder to lynch that person. You may use it on yourself.
QUOTE
Give light to the small one who, walks his path alone. You're Lucas.
A young shy boy with incredible psychic powers. You're the hero from Nowhere isles who saved the world from Pokey's selfish desire to destroy everything. With your friends Kumatora, Duster and Boney, you had an amazing adventure during which you learned courage and the value of not fleeing from difficult situations. But at the terrible cost of losing half your family. Now Lucas, fight to protect your new friends. Show them that you're no longer the crybaby of your youth, but a fine young man, worthy of wielding the awesome power that is PK Love.
You win with the Big Four. If they collapse, ou can win with the Loyalists or the Kids.
Your power is:
Psi Defence up α: Once a day, you may post in the forums “PSI Defence up α: (person)†to make it harder to lynch that person. You may use it on yourself.
Daganev2009-02-18 23:11:02
gah!, the bolded line was "You can win with the Loyalists or the Kids."
We learned about the loyalists before we learned about the rebels.
I'm sticking with Furien. He isn't new enough to be making so many mistakes /lies without hiding something.
We learned about the loyalists before we learned about the rebels.
I'm sticking with Furien. He isn't new enough to be making so many mistakes /lies without hiding something.
Narsrim2009-02-18 23:11:24
To be fair, it is difficult to read the bolded text in your quote when you don't bold it correctly 
Kiradawea2009-02-18 23:11:29
A notice that the moderator is going to bed, and that any questions and death-threaths should be PMed to me. I'll get back to you as soon as I can.
Furien2009-02-18 23:12:19
QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 18 2009, 03:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So is it your argument that you didn't read the bolded line in the following quote?
Yes. I know who Lucas is (played Mother 3), looked down, 'You win with the Big 4.' K, normal. Looked down again, power. Continue to the rest of the thread, having woken up ten minutes beforehand.
Why did I say Ike, earlier? I meant Lucas. Must have been thinking of Olimar's buddy in Pikmin 2.
Daganev2009-02-18 23:12:40
QUOTE (Narsrim @ Feb 18 2009, 03:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
To be fair, it is difficult to read the bolded text in your quote when you don't bold it correctly
yeah yeah, I
you! Narsrim2009-02-18 23:13:22
Bah, epic fail on my behalf 
Dai2009-02-18 23:13:30
QUOTE (Shamarah @ Feb 18 2009, 11:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Dai comes across as more newbie than scummy.
Furien2009-02-18 23:21:41
Lastly, I'll just make two appeals to logic:
1. Zelda on the same side as Ganondorf. Really? Even someone who hasn't played the games would find something wrong with this.
2. I accidentally said my role was aligned with the Rebels, leading to the mod asking if there had been a typo. I could have said 'yes, there was a typo' and have been mod-confirmed Loyalist. I instead admitted it was my own error.
1. Zelda on the same side as Ganondorf. Really? Even someone who hasn't played the games would find something wrong with this.
2. I accidentally said my role was aligned with the Rebels, leading to the mod asking if there had been a typo. I could have said 'yes, there was a typo' and have been mod-confirmed Loyalist. I instead admitted it was my own error.
Daganev2009-02-18 23:27:52
QUOTE (Furien @ Feb 18 2009, 03:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Lastly, I'll just make two appeals to logic:
1. Zelda on the same side as Ganondorf. Really? Even someone who hasn't played the games would find something wrong with this.
2. I accidentally said my role was aligned with the Rebels, leading to the mod asking if there had been a typo. I could have said 'yes, there was a typo' and have been mod-confirmed Loyalist. I instead admitted it was my own error.
1. Zelda on the same side as Ganondorf. Really? Even someone who hasn't played the games would find something wrong with this.
2. I accidentally said my role was aligned with the Rebels, leading to the mod asking if there had been a typo. I could have said 'yes, there was a typo' and have been mod-confirmed Loyalist. I instead admitted it was my own error.
1. Ganondorf is also on the same side as Bowser, and you arn't Zelda anymore you are Shiek.
2. S.A.W is not the moderator, so there was mod-confirmed anything possible. S.A.W is another player just like us who noticed your inconsistancy.
QUOTE (S.A.W. @ Feb 18 2009, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wait.. you're a Rebel and not a Loyalist?
Furien2009-02-18 23:29:20
QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 18 2009, 03:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
1. Ganondorf is also on the same side as Bowser, and you arn't Zelda anymore you are Shiek.
2. S.A.W is not the moderator, so there was mod-confirmed anything possible. S.A.W is another player just like us who noticed your inconsistancy.
2. S.A.W is not the moderator, so there was mod-confirmed anything possible. S.A.W is another player just like us who noticed your inconsistancy.
1. I'm both. You know, the whole TRANSFORM deal? It does not change my role. Zelda and Sheik are the same exact person. A look at the game lore will tell you this. Zelda became Sheik in the Ocarina of Time to secretly teach Link several songs and give him items. Once again, not scummy.
2. Not what I meant, you're having reading comprehension difficulties, but I'm double checking whether I should even talk about it now.
Fania2009-02-18 23:36:08
QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 18 2009, 03:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
2. S.A.W is not the moderator, so there was mod-confirmed anything possible. S.A.W is another player just like us who noticed your inconsistancy.
Saw just seems like the Moderator because he keeps arranging all of the information for us. Wonder if that's part of his role? Might just be something he does.
Daganev2009-02-18 23:37:57
"2. I accidentally said my role was aligned with the Rebels, leading to the mod asking if there had been a typo. I could have said 'yes, there was a typo' and have been mod-confirmed Loyalist. I instead admitted it was my own error."
This is what you wrote.
I don't care what you say about my reading comprehension abilities, but The mod never asked you anything on the forums. And in less than 1 minute, you resonded to S.A.W, saying you misread your role. After S.A.W asked you about it.
Are you suggesting we lynch Casilu because he is Bowser and bowser is always evil? If not , why do you think saying that "zelda is good" is a valid defense?
This is what you wrote.
I don't care what you say about my reading comprehension abilities, but The mod never asked you anything on the forums. And in less than 1 minute, you resonded to S.A.W, saying you misread your role. After S.A.W asked you about it.
Are you suggesting we lynch Casilu because he is Bowser and bowser is always evil? If not , why do you think saying that "zelda is good" is a valid defense?
