Super Smash Bros Brawl Mafia

by Kiradawea

Back to The Real World.

Harkux2009-02-19 01:14:34
I fail to see how I was 'excessive'. Dag asked me why I didn't vote, and at the time, I said I didn't know what to vote. As the stuff was coming up and Dai was bring shady, that's why I voted what I did.

And i haven't been on the forum that much tonight, I've been kicked off my computer every time I've really had the chance to do something for more than 5 seconds tongue.gif

UNVOTE

-shrug-
kiriwe2009-02-19 01:16:14
She already posted saying you were, if I'm not mistaken
Tekora2009-02-19 01:17:18
Oh, then I must have missed it amongst the 15 pages of posts made in 16 hours.
Fania2009-02-19 01:24:42
QUOTE (Kiriwe y'Kaliath @ Feb 18 2009, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
right. forgot about that. unvote

There are still a lot of people who haven't said anything yet!



Yeah but there was a lot that happened between when I left after the night actions happened, and when I started again. There is still a lot of people who might speak up, and others who are keeping their traps shut so they don't get exposed. I think talking is the best action for some, though.

QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 18 2009, 04:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Harkux posts so far: (thats all 4 of them)


Yeah I think he's against the Loyalists, because he probably saw that Dai claimed to win with the loyalists, which is now confirmed.
Fania2009-02-19 01:27:04
Sorry I take a while posting and don't always see the current events when I do get a chance to post.
kiriwe2009-02-19 01:31:41
QUOTE (Fania @ Feb 18 2009, 08:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah I think he's against the Loyalists, because he probably saw that Dai claimed to win with the loyalists, which is now confirmed.


What? That makes no sense to me.
A couple people have claimed Loyalists, with more interesting roles than his non-claimed one.

F.O.S.
kiriwe2009-02-19 01:33:09
when I say non-claimed, I mean Harkux voted before Dai claimed
Fania2009-02-19 01:41:07
QUOTE (Dai @ Feb 18 2009, 01:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Incorrect. I don't really want to claim at the moment, since I'm assuming that my rival has an ability similar to mine, and will want to knock me off. I win with the Loyalists, by the way.



QUOTE (Kiriwe y'Kaliath @ Feb 18 2009, 01:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
alright! We finally have something to work with.
Vote: Dai to get this train a-rollin.

Lets not make this a repeat of the last game, though, kay? We don't need to have five million roleclaims in one Day, let's leave a little mystery biggrin.gif



QUOTE (Harkux @ Feb 18 2009, 01:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Vote: Dai

confused.gif
Sorry, there's just a whole lot at risk if your rival DOES get benefitted by your death...


So yeah, you all voted after Dai said he'd win with the loyalists, but I don't know if it matters, because a lot of people were confused at that time.
Unknown2009-02-19 01:44:25
Really, the problem with mafia here isn't that people demand lots of claims, it's that everyone seems to have a role to claim in every single claim--no one here plays with vanilla townies and unnamed roles, which is the usual, and which allows for the waves of claiming to not work so well.

In normal games, you pressure someone to claim, they claim vanilla, no one believes them, and they get lynched. In games like this forum hosts, everyone has names and powers that people recognize, so someone claims and you have to just move on and push the next person. It's more the fault of the mods, not the players. People here play mostly the same as everywhere else, but the mods try and make it "interesting" and thus flood the game with powers and themes that make the mechanics go a bit wonky.

Anyway, Archer, can I ask what's making me seem scummy?

Aaand I'm glad the Furien bandwagon is over--whether he's rebel or loyalist, he's still on our team so long as the Big 4 remain standing. So let's just focus on working together that a great big happy family.

As for anything I can add beyond that, I'm not sure what we have to go on in terms of who we can lynch. We've pretty much run the course on most of the people we had fact-based reasons to train.
Daganev2009-02-19 01:50:25
You may notice that both Llandros and Kiri voted for Dai just to keep things moving and to get more info. Harkux however clinched onto my specious reasoning of him being a threat if he doesn't get lynched. Thats why my vote is on Harkux and not the other two.
Daganev2009-02-19 01:51:10
QUOTE (S.A.W. @ Feb 18 2009, 05:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As for anything I can add beyond that, I'm not sure what we have to go on in terms of who we can lynch. We've pretty much run the course on most of the people we had fact-based reasons to train.


I think soon we might just have to go after lurkers, but that normally backfires
Dai2009-02-19 01:52:24
QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 19 2009, 01:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You may notice that both Llandros and Kiri voted for Dai just to keep things moving and to get more info. Harkux however clinched onto my specious reasoning of him being a threat if he doesn't get lynched. Thats why my vote is on Harkux and not the other two.

So you voted for someone for agreeing with your reasoning, which you admitted was flawed? Doesn't that put you in a negative light, too? Or were you doing it deliberately? wtf.gif
Unknown2009-02-19 01:54:00
QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 18 2009, 08:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think soon we might just have to go after lurkers, but that normally backfires


Agreed, unless we just go for a no lynch and wait for our whole slew of investigators to turn something up. But no one ever agrees to that approach, so yeah, lurkers it'll be.
Unknown2009-02-19 01:54:43
QUOTE (Dai @ Feb 18 2009, 08:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So you voted for someone for agreeing with your reasoning, which you admitted was flawed? Doesn't that put you in a negative light, too? Or were you doing it deliberately? wtf.gif


He called it a trap, hence, deliberate.
Fania2009-02-19 01:56:20
QUOTE (daganev @ Feb 18 2009, 05:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think soon we might just have to go after lurkers, but that normally backfires


I don't blame them for lurking...this is a lot of information to get caught up on.

Also I can't prove anything about SAW, but he has been nice thus far so I'm thinking he's leaning towards the "good" side. Or that's what he'd have you think. dum dum DUUUMMMM!
Dai2009-02-19 01:57:02
A trap with me as the bait, then. I revealed my role due to his pressuring. That kinda makes me suspicious of Dag's motives.
Fania2009-02-19 02:04:57
I say no lynch, myself. There isn't enough information to go on, yet.....at least no one I want to vote out at this time.
Fania2009-02-19 02:08:25
I might as well as tell what my team healer does. It just allows me and all of you to see if I'm on a team with someone. I think I'll hold on to it for now, though. I wonder...is there anything against item trading?
kiriwe2009-02-19 02:09:05
Yeah, I think we'll find out more after another night. Voting no lynch sounds good, as I don't want to force anybody into another roleclaim. Doctor, protect Dai tonight, so Wolf doesn't get him?

I think I'm just going to vote instead of pointing fingers, for the rest of the game. I think more will get done that way.

Vote: no lynch
Fania2009-02-19 02:10:18
Vote: No Lynch