Gregori vs Thoros, Romero, Esano

by Gregori

Back to Combat Logs.

Shiri2009-02-19 01:42:28
Thoros raises the interesting point that crucify still makes this setup OP because if you can hinder them long enough for even one eq, you can trample/sac.

Meanwhile, Malarious demonstrates that fear is "obscenely stupid", crunch is a "long term win" (but not hunger), ninjakari is "alot more tame", and perfectfifth should stop tumble in progress. Hmmm.
Dai2009-02-19 01:54:56
Wouldn't the obvious fix to make trample not affect crucified people? It doesn't make a lot of sense to begin with. Is the horse punching them with its hooves? I mean, obviously a crucified person is flagged as prone, but it's not like they're lying on the ground, they're nailed to a freaking cross.
Malarious2009-02-19 02:25:34
QUOTE (Dai @ Feb 18 2009, 08:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wouldn't the obvious fix to make trample not affect crucified people? It doesn't make a lot of sense to begin with. Is the horse punching them with its hooves? I mean, obviously a crucified person is flagged as prone, but it's not like they're lying on the ground, they're nailed to a freaking cross.


Shhh this is forums, you arent allowed to use logic.

@Shiri: Yep we will go with that. Also you can actually 'cure' hunger. Then again I killed revan and romero while starving so you be the judge of that. Pfifth stops it, then a change occurs and it stops, you bug it and it changes back till the next tweak. 3p should stop A tumble, pinleg which is far more doable should not. Ninja are alot more tame, I didnt say perfect, but thats what the report is supposed to handle I imagine.

EDIT: Removed note on a similar tactic used now was removed from another guild.
Xenthos2009-02-19 02:27:15
QUOTE (Dai @ Feb 18 2009, 08:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wouldn't the obvious fix to make trample not affect crucified people? It doesn't make a lot of sense to begin with. Is the horse punching them with its hooves? I mean, obviously a crucified person is flagged as prone, but it's not like they're lying on the ground, they're nailed to a freaking cross.

But when you look at it that way, when you're stunned/paralyzed/webbed you're also not prone. You just have a P in the prompt.

How does Trample break your bones when you're standing up that way?

Making it only work when the target is actually prone didn't seem to be liked, though.
Malarious2009-02-19 02:30:15
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Feb 18 2009, 09:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But when you look at it that way, when you're stunned/paralyzed/webbed you're also not prone. You just have a P in the prompt.

How does Trample break your bones when you're standing up that way?

Making it only work when the target is actually prone didn't seem to be liked, though.


Only cause most people cant actually prone easily enough to make this worthwhile.

Heck you can be entangled and not on the ground.
Xenthos2009-02-19 02:32:01
QUOTE (Malarious @ Feb 18 2009, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Only cause most people cant actually prone easily enough to make this worthwhile.

Heck you can be entangled and not on the ground.

Yes.

But it is the exact same logic as not being able to be trampled while crucified.
Malarious2009-02-19 02:38:50
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Feb 18 2009, 09:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes.

But it is the exact same logic as not being able to be trampled while crucified.


I was agreeing with you as to why it just checks for prone and not real prone
Dai2009-02-19 02:50:37
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Feb 19 2009, 02:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But when you look at it that way, when you're stunned/paralyzed/webbed you're also not prone. You just have a P in the prompt.

How does Trample break your bones when you're standing up that way?

Making it only work when the target is actually prone didn't seem to be liked, though.

That's true, I suppose. But can't we judge each instance on a case-by-case basis, and in this case, flag crucify as a "seperate" type of prone, where trample doesn't affect it? It seems that would solve the problem while retaining the usefulness of trample.
Malarious2009-02-19 03:03:12
QUOTE (Dai @ Feb 18 2009, 09:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's true, I suppose. But can't we judge each instance on a case-by-case basis, and in this case, flag crucify as a "seperate" type of prone, where trample doesn't affect it? It seems that would solve the problem while retaining the usefulness of trample.


Outside of trample whoring, the only applicable uses for trample tend to be sap locks and sacrifice. It is almost made for sacrifice, and it can be used in solo sacrifices I assure you, even before the beast balance thing.
Casilu2009-02-19 03:31:12
QUOTE (Shiri @ Feb 18 2009, 05:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Meanwhile, Malarious demonstrates that fear is "obscenely stupid", crunch is a "long term win" (but not hunger), ninjakari is "alot more tame", and perfectfifth should stop tumble in progress. Hmmm.




I'm very disappointed in you. You neglected to bring up the random momentum loss from bullrage, which makes it the most annoying skill (to me) I can use right now.
Shiri2009-02-19 03:34:10
Oh yeah, I knew there was something else I wanted to add into that post...I doubt Malarious has ever even seen bullrage or knows what it does. I was gonna comment on that originally but the forums were lagged to crap and something weird happened and deleted the second half of my post so it didn't get through.
Casilu2009-02-19 03:35:04
QUOTE (Shiri @ Feb 18 2009, 07:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Oh yeah, I knew there was something else I wanted to add into that post...I doubt Malarious has ever even seen bullrage or knows what it does. I was gonna comment on that originally but the forums were lagged to crap and something weird happened and deleted the second half of my post so it didn't get through.


Excuses. Some AI program you are.
Shiri2009-02-19 03:35:47
losewings.gif
Casilu2009-02-19 03:37:25
QUOTE (Shiri @ Feb 18 2009, 07:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
losewings.gif


You have the A, but not the I. Haha!
Celina2009-02-19 04:35:54
QUOTE (Shiri @ Feb 18 2009, 07:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thoros raises the interesting point that crucify still makes this setup OP because if you can hinder them long enough for even one eq, you can trample/sac.

Meanwhile, Malarious demonstrates that fear is "obscenely stupid", crunch is a "long term win" (but not hunger), ninjakari is "alot more tame", and perfectfifth should stop tumble in progress. Hmmm.


Hunger is not a long term win. Hunger sucks.

I've lost to Romero in a spar because of hunger, that was entirely preventable and 100% my fault.

I wish pfifth stopped tumble, but for purely selfish reasons. sad.gif
Unknown2009-02-19 04:36:42
QUOTE (Charune @ Feb 19 2009, 03:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Just noticed this thread.

Fyi, trample's being changed along with the envoy reports, so once I finish coding those (should be soon), this will be fixed.

I liked how everyone ignored you.
Ronny2009-02-19 05:06:13
QUOTE (Malarious @ Feb 19 2009, 08:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
To a limited extent, pinleg is a knight skill so it can be done twice every 2-3s. Crucify for Desitrus' info does at least cost 7p. Which reminds me, can pfifth begin stopping tumble again yet?


Pinleg has a wound requirement that you can keep up with decently 1v1 with splendours. 2 lunges on one leg assuming you have heavy wounds on said leg means it takes one writhe/contort to get out of them both. 2p for lunge means it can only be done 5 times in a row before you're reduced to strikes (Not taking anything in beastmastery into account since its under review and -should- be nerfed!) which hit parry and stance. If you let a warrior get enough wounds to let him pin both legs in one combo with strikes, it was bad parrying/stancing.

What you are really ranting about is probably multiple warriors building 3k wounds in a gankfest which is hardly different from knockdown stun + amissio + amissio + amissio + absolve or whatever else.

EDIT: Sorry, correction from Vathael. The max number of times you can writhe from pinlegs/impales to clear them is 2 even if 2 warriors hit you for 4 pins.
Charune2009-02-19 05:17:30
QUOTE (Caerulo @ Feb 18 2009, 11:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I liked how everyone ignored you.


Four-legged discrimination? confused.gif
Casilu2009-02-19 05:18:55
QUOTE (Charune @ Feb 18 2009, 09:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Four-legged discrimination? confused.gif


Melville's an Axelord, we can cure you!
Dai2009-02-19 05:30:52
QUOTE (Charune @ Feb 19 2009, 05:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Four-legged discrimination? confused.gif

Four legs good, two legs better! Four legs good, two legs better!