Kiradawea2009-06-25 13:25:52
If it's a lurker you want, Konton has only posted once.
Personally, I've yet to find anyone I'd want to focus on. Maybe Xavius for voting no-lynch, or thisismydisplayname (gonna shorten that to something eventually) as it seems that he wants to just jump on a simple lynch bandwagon. Sure, day one is sloooooooooooow, but it hasn't got to the point where we should make stupid decisions.
Personally, I've yet to find anyone I'd want to focus on. Maybe Xavius for voting no-lynch, or thisismydisplayname (gonna shorten that to something eventually) as it seems that he wants to just jump on a simple lynch bandwagon. Sure, day one is sloooooooooooow, but it hasn't got to the point where we should make stupid decisions.
Siam2009-06-25 13:43:58
t.i.m.d.
Also, it's my first forum Mafia Game and prior to playing I had in mind a fast paced game. Alas, I was wrong, and having thus attracted Kira's suspicion, I now
UNVOTE
Also, it's my first forum Mafia Game and prior to playing I had in mind a fast paced game. Alas, I was wrong, and having thus attracted Kira's suspicion, I now
UNVOTE
Unknown2009-06-25 13:45:15
To be fair, I've only posted once as well - twice now, I suppose. Reason being is that I'm new to this whole thing, and no one has offered compelling evidence for me to change my vote... but on the other hand, I'm not experienced enough to look through the veil and see the mafia beneath. Maybe he's in the same boat.
Zynna2009-06-25 13:59:36
Re quote below. I don't recall Solanis being this quiet in past games. He's normally quite talkative as I recall and throwing theories out there...even when he's not confirmed someone as scum.
Hmm.
Hmm.
QUOTE (Shiri @ Jun 25 2009, 08:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How lurky would you guys say Solanis is normally? My main problem with him is. usually that he posts too much random nonsensical crap, rather than that he posts too little actual content. But that might just be my memory being fuzzy.
Dugan2009-06-25 15:51:45
I am really starting to have a problem with all of these people saying we need to go after lurkers. It is day 1, we barely have 13 pages. I feel it is way to early to start going after the lurkers and sorry, thats just giving me some suspicion on you. I don't have anything to contribute, but so and so has only made one post, they are lurking lets get them. We had the whole Myrkr thing, the insane Bali comments and his whole thing of 'I just want to use my ability' and all of that and yet, we had three or four people who want to focus on the lurkers. I don't get it.
Daganev2009-06-25 17:16:21
QUOTE (Dugan Diluculo @ Jun 25 2009, 08:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I am really starting to have a problem with all of these people saying we need to go after lurkers. It is day 1, we barely have 13 pages. I feel it is way to early to start going after the lurkers and sorry, thats just giving me some suspicion on you. I don't have anything to contribute, but so and so has only made one post, they are lurking lets get them. We had the whole Myrkr thing, the insane Bali comments and his whole thing of 'I just want to use my ability' and all of that and yet, we had three or four people who want to focus on the lurkers. I don't get it.
So far, nothing, in my mind atleast, has given us info on scum.
Since, we are getting all pouncy on people who are most likely scum, I think it is safe to assume that the scum are "sitting back and laughing" thus making them lurkers.
However, at this point, I don't think we are looking for lurkers such as Konton, or Allergic to Sabre. Rather we are looking for lurkers who are "watching" (I.e. we have evidence of them looking at the thread, but not contributing)
Btw. If someone doesn't post, because they never look at the thread, that isn't lurking.
Unknown2009-06-25 17:52:47
Xavius or Myrkr
Get to voting.
Get to voting.
Unknown2009-06-25 17:55:05
QUOTE (B_a_L_i @ Jun 25 2009, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Xavius or Myrkr
Get to voting.
Get to voting.
Why Xavius? I have an idea of why people want to vote for me, but why Xavius?
Unknown2009-06-25 18:02:09
I don't think we should look at lynching actual lurkers on Day 1 on general principles, especially since it usually drags on for a while and our current bunch includes a few people who are playing this round for the first time.
What I don't get on a second read-through is why people are so quick to dismiss Myrkr and the inconsistencies in her posts. After all the pressure, she responds with this post, which is just a reiteration of what she already said beforehand. She didn't address any of the accusations and questions at all, and once again ends with 'if you don't believe me, lynch me, go ahead.'
The lack of response to Zynna's post here so far doesn't do anything to alleviate my personal suspicions, either. Keeping my vote where it is for now.
I do FoS Solanis for posting more claims that he has nothing to contribute than anything else, though, as well as for defending Myrkr here in a way that sounds way too much like a nudgenudgehint for my liking.
What I don't get on a second read-through is why people are so quick to dismiss Myrkr and the inconsistencies in her posts. After all the pressure, she responds with this post, which is just a reiteration of what she already said beforehand. She didn't address any of the accusations and questions at all, and once again ends with 'if you don't believe me, lynch me, go ahead.'
The lack of response to Zynna's post here so far doesn't do anything to alleviate my personal suspicions, either. Keeping my vote where it is for now.
I do FoS Solanis for posting more claims that he has nothing to contribute than anything else, though, as well as for defending Myrkr here in a way that sounds way too much like a nudgenudgehint for my liking.
Diamondais2009-06-25 18:02:50
It probably had to do with the arguments before, his decision to originally vote no lynch and stuff along that line.
Daganev2009-06-25 18:17:38
QUOTE (Silferras @ Jun 25 2009, 11:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't think we should look at lynching actual lurkers on Day 1 on general principles, especially since it usually drags on for a while and our current bunch includes a few people who are playing this round for the first time.
What I don't get on a second read-through is why people are so quick to dismiss Myrkr and the inconsistencies in her posts. After all the pressure, she responds with this post, which is just a reiteration of what she already said beforehand. She didn't address any of the accusations and questions at all, and once again ends with 'if you don't believe me, lynch me, go ahead.'
The lack of response to Zynna's post here so far doesn't do anything to alleviate my personal suspicions, either. Keeping my vote where it is for now.
I do FoS Solanis for posting more claims that he has nothing to contribute than anything else, though, as well as for defending Myrkr here in a way that sounds way too much like a nudgenudgehint for my liking.
What I don't get on a second read-through is why people are so quick to dismiss Myrkr and the inconsistencies in her posts. After all the pressure, she responds with this post, which is just a reiteration of what she already said beforehand. She didn't address any of the accusations and questions at all, and once again ends with 'if you don't believe me, lynch me, go ahead.'
The lack of response to Zynna's post here so far doesn't do anything to alleviate my personal suspicions, either. Keeping my vote where it is for now.
I do FoS Solanis for posting more claims that he has nothing to contribute than anything else, though, as well as for defending Myrkr here in a way that sounds way too much like a nudgenudgehint for my liking.
Has there ever been a scum with daykill abilities?
Unknown2009-06-25 18:21:18
Would that mean that there could never be one, especially given the mod?
Ayisdra2009-06-25 18:24:44
There is also the fact of our passive survival percent, I wouldn't rule out of at least one scum having a daykill power.
Unknown2009-06-25 18:25:03
Actually, after remembering the blanket 25% nightkill resist, I'm starting to think it's a distinct possibility if you take into consideration the fact that Myrkr doesn't know which abilities kill and which not.
Noola2009-06-25 18:34:36
Unvote.
I'm not entirely sure who to put my vote to though. There's a few kinda suspicious folks, and Myrkr.
I'm not entirely sure who to put my vote to though. There's a few kinda suspicious folks, and Myrkr.
Unknown2009-06-25 18:34:53
Guessing the mod does not get far with Casilu at the helm.
While others seem suspicious to me, they are relatively newer players. I do not believe we will get any more information out of Myrkr, so I move to Vote: Xavius. In his own words,
While others seem suspicious to me, they are relatively newer players. I do not believe we will get any more information out of Myrkr, so I move to Vote: Xavius. In his own words,
QUOTE (Xavius @ Jun 24 2009, 02:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Generally, fearlessness is a town tell, and caution is a scum tell.
Yet his first move was to Vote: No Lynch.Noola2009-06-25 18:35:46
QUOTE (Xikue @ Jun 25 2009, 01:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Guessing the mod does not get far with Casilu at the helm.
While others seem suspicious to me, they are relatively newer players. I do not believe we will get any more information out of Myrkr, so I move to Vote: Xavius. In his own words,
Yet his first move was to Vote: No Lynch.
While others seem suspicious to me, they are relatively newer players. I do not believe we will get any more information out of Myrkr, so I move to Vote: Xavius. In his own words,
Yet his first move was to Vote: No Lynch.
Mmm... good point!
Shaddus2009-06-25 18:38:39
QUOTE (Xikue @ Jun 25 2009, 01:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
-Xavius' post-
That does seem rather convoluted.
UNVOTE, VOTE:XAVIUS
Unknown2009-06-25 18:40:26
QUOTE (Xikue @ Jun 25 2009, 02:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Guessing the mod does not get far with Casilu at the helm.
While others seem suspicious to me, they are relatively newer players. I do not believe we will get any more information out of Myrkr, so I move to Vote: Xavius. In his own words,
Yet his first move was to Vote: No Lynch.
While others seem suspicious to me, they are relatively newer players. I do not believe we will get any more information out of Myrkr, so I move to Vote: Xavius. In his own words,
Yet his first move was to Vote: No Lynch.
You've raised a great point, and I support it.
Vote: Xavius.
How many votes does he have?
Dugan2009-06-25 18:41:50
I can go with this.
UNVOTE
VOTE Xavius
UNVOTE
VOTE Xavius