Kiradawea2009-07-17 19:11:26
Oooh. Good thing I got my popcorn. This looks fun.
Llandros2009-07-17 19:23:56
QUOTE (Xavius @ Jul 17 2009, 03:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You better hope it does! Why're you continuing to evade providing reasoning for your votes? It doesn't work so well when you know how the game is set up and who is who, eh? You saw a couple people vote, so you and your scum buddies bandwagoned on?
I've stated twice, just today why i think you are scum, which is more than most of the people who voted for you.
http://forums.lusternia.com/index.php?show...46&st=1502#
http://forums.lusternia.com/index.php?show...46&st=1518#
Also, let’s not forget that you made the lynch vote on Diamondais mid discussion of her role claim.
Too bad you can’t rewrite history in these games or you might have made a point.
Xavius2009-07-17 19:26:48
You linked to...
and
Do you expect people not to read links?
QUOTE (Llandros @ Jul 16 2009, 11:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
by my count that's 5 votes for xavius
and
QUOTE (Llandros @ Jul 16 2009, 08:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hey Myrkr, i think Xavius just volunteered for you to test your next phrase on him
Do you expect people not to read links?
Llandros2009-07-17 19:41:39
Well, i guess i did the links wrong but they are posts 1502 and 1518.
Xavius2009-07-17 19:49:08
Here, I'll do it for you.
The no lynch thing has been covered by multiple people multiple times. I did not push a no lynch. I was expressing "fail town is fail." And you're right, I'm fully aware that people take no lynch = scum around here as gospel truth, which is...bizarre, since mathematical models have frequently shown no lynch to be a winning choice (but admittedly risky because it deprives the town of its primary weapon). You should consider that I know what perceptions are when you go flailing around and let that knowledge inform your decision making. It's the basis of being a responsible individual when you're not on the forums, you know.
As for the second post...you want me to claim because a handful of now-confirmed non-scum roles pushed the train off me?
QUOTE (Llandros @ Jul 16 2009, 11:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Xavius voting no lynch on day one still confounds me. Even if he was joking it's still bizare and a scum red flag that he should know about.
vote xavius
vote xavius
QUOTE (Llandros @ Jul 16 2009, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It goes back to the first day when he was all scummy and on everyone's list. After a while though people moved on to other people and we really never got back to him.
The no lynch thing has been covered by multiple people multiple times. I did not push a no lynch. I was expressing "fail town is fail." And you're right, I'm fully aware that people take no lynch = scum around here as gospel truth, which is...bizarre, since mathematical models have frequently shown no lynch to be a winning choice (but admittedly risky because it deprives the town of its primary weapon). You should consider that I know what perceptions are when you go flailing around and let that knowledge inform your decision making. It's the basis of being a responsible individual when you're not on the forums, you know.
As for the second post...you want me to claim because a handful of now-confirmed non-scum roles pushed the train off me?
Xavius2009-07-17 19:49:45
Fake edit: I use non-scum loosely there, since Furien helped, but Furien obviously wasn't on anybody's team.
Llandros2009-07-17 19:51:42
QUOTE (Xavius @ Jul 17 2009, 03:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As for the second post...you want me to claim because a handful of now-confirmed non-scum roles pushed the train off me?
Who do you consider confirmed?
Xavius2009-07-17 19:52:50
QUOTE (Llandros @ Jul 17 2009, 02:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Who do you consider confirmed?
Shamarah and Furien are both on the list. Shamarah is power-confirmed, Furien is mod-confirmed.
Llandros2009-07-17 19:56:14
QUOTE (Xavius @ Jul 17 2009, 03:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Shamarah and Furien are both on the list. Shamarah is power-confirmed, Furien is mod-confirmed.
err, Furien is a confirmed SK, and Shamarah roleclaimed survivor.....
Xavius2009-07-17 19:57:16
QUOTE (Llandros @ Jul 17 2009, 02:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
err, Furien is a confirmed SK, and Shamarah roleclaimed survivor.....
And neither are mafia.
Shamarah2009-07-17 21:35:44
Yeah, I'm not buying the Xavius lynch, there doesn't seem to be a good reason for it.
Rika2009-07-17 21:47:35
I'm going to vote: Llandros. His reason for voting seems flimsy to me and his defensive aggressiveness isn't really helping.
Rika2009-07-17 21:50:07
Oops. Vote: Llandros
Llandros2009-07-17 21:58:55
QUOTE (rika @ Jul 17 2009, 05:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm going to vote: Llandros. His reason for voting seems flimsy to me and his defensive aggressiveness isn't really helping.
He started it
Llandros2009-07-17 22:00:54
QUOTE (rika @ Jul 17 2009, 05:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm going to vote: Llandros. His reason for voting seems flimsy to me and his defensive aggressiveness isn't really helping.
Also, at least i gave a reason, and i'm not going to appologize for challenging him on his evasiveness.
Xavius2009-07-18 03:42:08
QUOTE (Llandros @ Jul 17 2009, 05:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Also, at least i gave a reason, and i'm not going to appologize for challenging him on his evasiveness.
There is no evasiveness except where you thought you could will something to happen without any legitimate reason. Still waiting on a reason that bears some resemblance to good sense.
Also, why've you "used" your power to only confirm things after the fact? Really and truly, that's a traditional sign of a fake claim. It's a psychic's parlor trick.
Shaddus2009-07-18 03:43:52
Oh, and I am in no way attached to Llandros, whether he's scum, town, or whatever. He can vouch for me, but my role doesn't mention anyone else.
Llandros2009-07-18 04:05:19
QUOTE (Xavius @ Jul 17 2009, 11:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There is no evasiveness except where you thought you could will something to happen without any legitimate reason. Still waiting on a reason that bears some resemblance to good sense.
Also, why've you "used" your power to only confirm things after the fact? Really and truly, that's a traditional sign of a fake claim. It's a psychic's parlor trick.
Also, why've you "used" your power to only confirm things after the fact? Really and truly, that's a traditional sign of a fake claim. It's a psychic's parlor trick.
There's no reason to lynch, pressure or convince you of anything. When Casilu comes back any info you have will be recovered from your body.
This is all just a painfully obvious OMGUS from somone who's butt hurt about getting day killed. He's trying to cast doubt on me in a last ditch effort to get back at me for suggesting that Myrkr might want to test a phrase on him due to him being uncooperative. Sadly, i fell for it and got a little aggro.
I have not made any claims of any kind. You have no idea what i can or can't do. Also, you are wrong. I stated Shaddus' name as being Mello and Siam as Near. Neither of them have refuited this information.
Llandros2009-07-18 04:06:10
QUOTE (Shaddus Mes'ard @ Jul 17 2009, 11:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Oh, and I am in no way attached to Llandros, whether he's scum, town, or whatever. He can vouch for me, but my role doesn't mention anyone else.
Are you saying that your name is not Mello?
Llandros2009-07-18 04:08:02
Also, I don't vouch for Shaddus. I know he is Mello and was led to believe that he is town.