Rika2009-07-23 05:32:47
Why Shaddus and not Llandros though..?
Shiri2009-07-23 05:42:10
Because ...ok good question, I guess I was carrying over my mistrust of Shaddus over Llandros from yesterday (Mello might be a danger role even if Llandros is town) but if the claim is Llandros or Rika I guess that isn't necessarily optimal...
Llandros, before we get any further, do you know anything specific about Rika's rolename? Like, do you think she's lying about being Mannfred, or is she Mannfred but has scum powers, or what/
Llandros, before we get any further, do you know anything specific about Rika's rolename? Like, do you think she's lying about being Mannfred, or is she Mannfred but has scum powers, or what/
Jack2009-07-23 05:42:45
Huhu. Mannfred.
Shaddus2009-07-23 05:43:54
QUOTE (rika @ Jul 23 2009, 12:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why Shaddus and not Llandros though..?
Because Shiri has an AUTOVOTE SHADDUS setting on his mafia screen >.<.
It never fails, in Shiri's mind I'm always scum.
Shiri2009-07-23 05:45:43
It helps if you don't kill proven townies just because they're voting for you...but in any case I changed my mind, just waiting on Llandros for plan update
Shaddus2009-07-23 05:47:38
QUOTE (Shiri @ Jul 23 2009, 12:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It helps if you don't kill proven townies just because they're voting for you...but in any case I changed my mind, just waiting on Llandros for plan update
I did that seven mafia games ago. When are you going to let it drop?
Shiri2009-07-23 05:51:06
Have I been in any with you when you weren't scum or acting ridiculously scummy since? That's just the one that stands out most.
Shaddus2009-07-23 05:55:15
QUOTE (Shiri @ Jul 23 2009, 12:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Have I been in any with you when you weren't scum or acting ridiculously scummy since? That's just the one that stands out most.
Yes, and 95% of the time I'm not scum but you say I have a "scummy vibe". Either way, vote for me or don't, but I haven't caused anyone to be killed.
Kiradawea2009-07-23 12:45:52
Shaddus has this unique ability to appear as scum in pretty much any game he plays, poor guy.
Llandros2009-07-23 13:10:32
This time i only got an alignment. Granted there is a 5% chance she is town but I still don't belive she is town.
Shiri2009-07-23 14:21:26
Hypothetically she could be a scum with those powers, but it would be pretty weird for an SK to have ones like those and our current hypothesis is the latter, so how convinced are you that she's lying?
Siam2009-07-23 14:22:08
okay, unvote vote:shaddus
Siam2009-07-23 14:25:13
QUOTE (Llandros @ Jul 23 2009, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This time i only got an alignment. Granted there is a 5% chance she is town but I still don't belive she is town.
Okay, I just saw this.
UNVOTE
Why is there a 5% chance that she is town,Llandros?
Shiri2009-07-23 14:26:34
I'm gonna unvote too since it seems like Llandros or Rika are just better choices.
Unknown2009-07-23 14:46:43
Llandros, please explain where the 5% came from.
Llandros2009-07-23 15:03:54
I don't make the rules, ask Casilu. I can just tell you what i know.
She's still very unlikely to be town, is an evil character and has the power to ninja lynch.
She's still very unlikely to be town, is an evil character and has the power to ninja lynch.
Shiri2009-07-23 15:16:50
I'm gonna Vote: Llandros. Rika has been kind of lurky this game, and Llandros has been kind of scummy. There's a few main scenarios here:
1. Llandros is scum, Rika is telling the truth: Rika kills a scum for us, yay
2. Llandros is telling the truth, Rika has that power and is scum: we find out as much and kill Rika tomorrow.
3. Llandros is telling the truth, Rika doesn't have that power: having wasted a bunch of our time, we kill Rika and don't lose Llandros
4. Llandros is telling the truth and is wrong - 5% chance of this so we can't really bet on it?
Killing Llandros also helps us get a bead on Shaddus, which will be important if it turns out we're missing a (really survivable) mafia instead of another SK. We also have an already semi-proven investigator around, AND a still-living doctor (and probably a still-living townie roleblocker, though that's not certain.) Plus he didn't turn up anything even though he investigated Rika last night, so that casts more doubt on Llandros' claim. I think this is a fairly safe and worthwhile play.
1. Llandros is scum, Rika is telling the truth: Rika kills a scum for us, yay
2. Llandros is telling the truth, Rika has that power and is scum: we find out as much and kill Rika tomorrow.
3. Llandros is telling the truth, Rika doesn't have that power: having wasted a bunch of our time, we kill Rika and don't lose Llandros
4. Llandros is telling the truth and is wrong - 5% chance of this so we can't really bet on it?
Killing Llandros also helps us get a bead on Shaddus, which will be important if it turns out we're missing a (really survivable) mafia instead of another SK. We also have an already semi-proven investigator around, AND a still-living doctor (and probably a still-living townie roleblocker, though that's not certain.) Plus he didn't turn up anything even though he investigated Rika last night, so that casts more doubt on Llandros' claim. I think this is a fairly safe and worthwhile play.
Siam2009-07-23 15:24:15
QUOTE (Shiri @ Jul 23 2009, 11:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm gonna Vote: Llandros. Rika has been kind of lurky this game, and Llandros has been kind of scummy. There's a few main scenarios here:
1. Llandros is scum, Rika is telling the truth: Rika kills a scum for us, yay
2. Llandros is telling the truth, Rika has that power and is scum: we find out as much and kill Rika tomorrow.
3. Llandros is telling the truth, Rika doesn't have that power: having wasted a bunch of our time, we kill Rika and don't lose Llandros
4. Llandros is telling the truth and is wrong - 5% chance of this so we can't really bet on it?
Killing Llandros also helps us get a bead on Shaddus, which will be important if it turns out we're missing a (really survivable) mafia instead of another SK. We also have an already semi-proven investigator around, AND a still-living doctor (and probably a still-living townie roleblocker, though that's not certain.) Plus he didn't turn up anything even though he investigated Rika last night, so that casts more doubt on Llandros' claim. I think this is a fairly safe and worthwhile play.
1. Llandros is scum, Rika is telling the truth: Rika kills a scum for us, yay
2. Llandros is telling the truth, Rika has that power and is scum: we find out as much and kill Rika tomorrow.
3. Llandros is telling the truth, Rika doesn't have that power: having wasted a bunch of our time, we kill Rika and don't lose Llandros
4. Llandros is telling the truth and is wrong - 5% chance of this so we can't really bet on it?
Killing Llandros also helps us get a bead on Shaddus, which will be important if it turns out we're missing a (really survivable) mafia instead of another SK. We also have an already semi-proven investigator around, AND a still-living doctor (and probably a still-living townie roleblocker, though that's not certain.) Plus he didn't turn up anything even though he investigated Rika last night, so that casts more doubt on Llandros' claim. I think this is a fairly safe and worthwhile play.
He did say that there's a 5% chance that Rika is town. What he hasn't elaborate is why it's a '5%' chance - is it something based on Rika's win condition? Or something else? I'm inclined to believe Llandros is town, but it'd really help a lot if he explained what he's posted recently about Rika.
Shiri2009-07-23 15:28:40
I kind of thought he was trying to claim there was a chance of error so he had a (minimally) plausible excuse if he was wrong, but without violating this "I can't roleclaim" restriction he is desperate to be seen as having (if Shamarah's idea is correct, anyway.)
Oh yeah, Llandros dying if Rika is telling the truth also clears up about Siam's alignment some, so there's another plus to that plan.
Oh yeah, Llandros dying if Rika is telling the truth also clears up about Siam's alignment some, so there's another plus to that plan.
Siam2009-07-23 15:33:02
gah, forgive my idiotic grammar and my stone-age internet