Duel-fight-thing

by Lekius

Back to Combat Logs.

Gregori2009-11-26 01:21:11
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Nov 25 2009, 07:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You're right, it happened. Nor is anyone denying it did. I'm trying to figure out what the heck the point of this log is. And, none of these comments are addressing that at all, they're just all "defending the right to post it." Which, of course, he has-- but I do also have the right to question it as a combat log.



He also said repeatedly what his reason for posting it was. You can dislike that reason, but it doesn't invalidate the reason just because you don't like.
Lekius2009-11-26 01:21:25
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Nov 25 2009, 05:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You're right, it happened. Nor is anyone denying it did. I'm trying to figure out what the heck the point of this log is. And, none of these comments are addressing that at all, they're just all "defending the right to post it." Which, of course, he has-- but I do also have the right to question it as a combat log.


Okay so I'm not being clear; the point of the log is that Sarrasri wanted to see it. I think because the whateveryouwanttocallit started in the same room as her and then dispersed to like 5 different places. Of course, something will be said about "She wanted to see the entire log" and then I'll come back with...what I've said 4-5 times now. She's agree that "Hey, alright this is all you have. Cool." and that, like I said, if Nienla wants to post the rest of the log that I don't have, she's more than welcome to. And again, she's encouraged to.
Gregori2009-11-26 01:22:32
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Nov 25 2009, 07:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
"I'm sure they'll be brought up, but I don't have them, so there's no point in requesting them" is how it reads, Gregori. Which is, essentially, "Don't bother asking about it because I don't have it."

Which, once more, leads me to "What is the point?".



Thank you for exactly proving my point. You don't read what is there. You read what you choose to be there.
Evomire2009-11-26 01:24:03
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Nov 26 2009, 01:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You're right, it happened. Nor is anyone denying it did. I'm trying to figure out what the heck the point of this log is. And, none of these comments are addressing that at all, they're just all "defending the right to post it." Which, of course, he has-- but I do also have the right to question it as a combat log.


No, it's been pointed out many times. Earlier, Lekius said that Nienla told him she'd post the rest. Sarrasri wanted to see the log. It's okay to object, but the fact that you know the full story and are still objecting says you're not being truthful. Maybe you take personal offense to it, maybe it's IC stuff bleeding over into OOC, maybe you just don't like Lekius. Regardless you're not really being reasonable.

So, I ask you. What is the reason that you continue to do this even though your original impression was clearly incorrect due to a lack of understanding on the subject?
Evomire2009-11-26 01:25:31
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Nov 26 2009, 01:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
"I'm sure they'll be brought up, but I don't have them, so there's no point in requesting them" is how it reads, Gregori. Which is, essentially, "Don't bother asking about it because I don't have it."

Which, once more, leads me to "What is the point?".


Goddamn man, do you have a brain tumor? I'm trying to be nice, but wow. You misquoted him, then paraphrased your misquote to try and twist it to what you want it to be. At this point you're just blatantly trolling.

Edit: Crap. Two posts in a row. This thread moves too fast.
Gregori2009-11-26 01:28:47
This reminds me of the time that Xenthos accused Shuyin of some vast conspiracy on the Bellator clan over something completely harmless involving Shuyin wanting to update his map (could be wrong on the exact circumstance of the 'conspiracy'). Went on for a couple hours with Xenthos despite being told the reason Shuyin did what he did still accusing of some ulterior motive. It must really suck to live in a world that is filled with paranoia as great as Xenthos displays.
Xenthos2009-11-26 01:30:02
QUOTE (Lekius @ Nov 25 2009, 08:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Okay so I'm not being clear; the point of the log is that Sarrasri wanted to see it. I think because the whateveryouwanttocallit started in the same room as her and then dispersed to like 5 different places. Of course, something will be said about "She wanted to see the entire log" and then I'll come back with...what I've said 4-5 times now. She's agree that "Hey, alright this is all you have. Cool." and that, like I said, if Nienla wants to post the rest of the log that I don't have, she's more than welcome to. And again, she's encouraged to.


And what I'm saying is, I'm not really seeing what the log shows. Nor the point.

QUOTE (Gregori @ Nov 25 2009, 08:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thank you for exactly proving my point. You don't read what is there. You read what you choose to be there.


That is exactly what is there. tongue.gif

QUOTE (EVOmire @ Nov 25 2009, 08:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No, it's been pointed out many times. Earlier, Lekius said that Nienla told him she'd post the rest. Sarrasri wanted to see the log. It's okay to object, but the fact that you know the full story and are still objecting says you're not being truthful. Maybe you take personal offense to it, maybe it's IC stuff bleeding over into OOC, maybe you just don't like Lekius. Regardless you're not really being reasonable.

So, I ask you. What is the reason that you continue to do this even though your original impression was clearly incorrect due to a lack of understanding on the subject?


Earlier, Lekius stated that Nienla "threatened" to post a log of him running, which is a far cry from an assurance that she would. It also was stated after I asked what this log demonstrates, and that hasn't been answered. Sarrasri requested the full log, yes. That's not what we have here. We have a snippet that shows... nothing, and he knows that, heh. Hence the disclaimers and such at the beginning. But then he called it the "nitty-gritty".
Gregori2009-11-26 01:34:00
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Nov 25 2009, 07:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That is exactly what is there. tongue.gif


Earlier, Lekius stated that Nienla "threatened" to post a log of him running, which is a far cry from an assurance that she would.


Ok, Xenthos... here I will help you... Go find your mommy. Ask her to read this thread to you. If need be ask her to explain big words. Because you obviously cannot read what is written, yet you still argue that what you say was written as what is so.
Xiel2009-11-26 01:34:11
/snippet

See, now, I just find it funny that posting up the log which was intended to elicit some sort of reaction from the other party...caused a bigger reaction from the initial poster rather than the intended target. Giggle.

/toddles off
Lekius2009-11-26 01:35:58
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Nov 25 2009, 05:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Earlier, Lekius stated that Nienla "threatened" to post a log of him running, which is a far cry from an assurance that she would. It also was stated after I asked what this log demonstrates, and that hasn't been answered. Sarrasri requested the full log, yes. That's not what we have here. We have a snippet that shows... nothing, and he knows that, heh. Hence the disclaimers and such at the beginning. But then he called it the "nitty-gritty".


Point A) never once did I say "Nienla threatened" I said she'll probably end up posting it. I said she should post it (to appease you) and I said she's welcome to post it. Never did I say "Nienla threatened to post."

Point cool.gif I called it the "nitty-gritty" solely because I've always understood that to mean there's an inkling of action within it. Regardless of how out of context it is, or regardless of how much of the other stuff I left out - which I said I don't have, again, gotta put that point in - and at this point I think you're just posting...to post.

So yeah, if a moderator could close/delete this thread I'd be thankful! It's obviously going nowhere. Thanks!

@Xiel That's the thing, I never intended to get a reaction out of Nienla, if I did get a reaction out of Nienla...I don't want to call it a bonus but whatever that's probably what it came out to be. I posted it because Sarrasri. Wanted. To. See. It. And if Nienla wants to post the parts I left out, she sure can and give Sarrasri a whole log.

But I would really recommend just closing/deleting the thread.
Evomire2009-11-26 01:38:03
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Nov 26 2009, 02:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And what I'm saying is, I'm not really seeing what the log shows. Nor the point.



That is exactly what is there. tongue.gif



Earlier, Lekius stated that Nienla "threatened" to post a log of him running, which is a far cry from an assurance that she would. It also was stated after I asked what this log demonstrates, and that hasn't been answered. Sarrasri requested the full log, yes. That's not what we have here. We have a snippet that shows... nothing, and he knows that, heh. Hence the disclaimers and such at the beginning. But then he called it the "nitty-gritty".





QUOTE
But I would really recommend just closing/deleting the thread.


Yeah, I'd agree. Some people are getting way too bent out of shape because Lekius wasn't as eloquent or detailed as he should have been initially. It's just a game, folks.
Desitrus2009-11-26 01:40:05
You people all make my brain hurt. Had she followed my instructions you would have lost or become bored and quit. Dumb of her to chase you. I'm sure there's more to the log than movement, I've even heard she used hexes once or twice.

Regardless, the epic quality of this thread has nothing to do with the log.
Diamondais2009-11-26 01:52:54
Sigh, this makes me wish I logged HoS some days but I don't honestly want to save the snarkiness present on all sides. It's just tiring.
Urazial2009-11-26 01:58:11
Even though that combat log is as thrilling as Mister Toad's Wild Ride, I'm not sure why it wasn't just messaged to whomever wanted to see it. Silly people.
Unknown2009-11-26 02:55:15
It is a good point that if you just wanted Sarrasri to see it, you could have just PMed or hosted it on nogfx or anywhere else.

There are only two reasons to post in combat logs:

1.) Peen stroking

2.) An actual fight

Since it is obviously not #2, then you can see why people think it's the other.

P.S. Reading Gregori and Xenthos argue back and forth tires my brain out.
Unknown2009-11-26 04:02:18
I didn't even read the log. I came into the thread, looked at the size of log in quotes, and then the fact that the thread was already three pages. This caused me to go right into the ultimate thread of the day straight off. Thanks guys. Lusternia forums == new 4chan. laugh.gif
Nienla2009-11-26 04:46:21
I'm not entirely sure what this is supposed to accomplish. I've openly admitted that I made a mistake by choking you right after you started deathsong. Mostly because I was getting agitated from chasing after you for a full fifteen minutes and I got lured into using it to try to pin you down, but it backfired. Ah well.
Veyrzhul2009-11-26 17:16:48
How disappointing, I was hoping for a nice fight sad.gif
Jack2010-01-11 14:41:30
Okay I know this log is a couple months old but hot damn my brain just ate itself.

What the hell.
Shiri2010-01-11 15:24:23
Ok, I missed this thread the first time somehow, so thank you for that Jack. doh.gif